(I would like to make a special note of thanks to Dean Gotcher of www.AuthorityResearch.com for the tireless research and effort and diligence in expounding many deep things. No one man stands tall unless they stand on the shoulders of giants.)
(A special note to teachers: This in no way questions your dedication and great efforts in your field. Most of these things are unknown to most teachers, and many are also frustrated but not sure by what. I hope you will take this as assistance in restoring good education rather than a slander on yourselves, though some soul searching will be necessary.)
The Concept of the Generation Gap is one which is a phenomenon of the 20th and now 21st Century. A distinct separation in supposed “understanding” of behaviour, thinking and culture differentiation (change / innovation) between parents and children.
Though admittedly the Gap in the 21st Century seems to be narrowing. Other sources declare that it is widening.
Why is this?
When we cast our minds back to what we can remember or what we remember hearing, there is virtually no person alive that can not remember the issue of the Generation Gap.
It then naturally falls to “our” limited and bias reason to accept that since this is all we have seen, and all those we know also being all they have seen, (materialistic worldview: ie Socratic Critical Theory – if you don’t see it, it does not exist), means and makes it the “norm” or our internalised “psycho-socialised history”.
To virtually all peoples, the “generation gap” is a societal norm where children go off the rails, do a little “experimenting” with sex drugs and rock n roll and hating their parents (facilitated by the entertainment industries) and thus assists in justifying what was originally defined as “sin” and “youthful lusts”.
It is this very phrase “sex drugs and rock n roll” which brings us to the greatest gulf or gap in history between parents and children.
This gap being the mid 20th Century.
“Marxist professors and bureaucrats, who began swelling the ranks of the [education]profession, made it their mission to set in place policies that would create a “Lord of the Flies” subculture. By the mid-60’s, it would be dubbed a “generation gap.” This subculture was endowed with power-and money-and by 1968 when I started to teach, cultural Marxism was trumping any serious effort to transmit knowledge to America’s youth.” pg 36 Walking Targets by BK Eakman
It is from this generation that we have engendered the term “generation gap” and it has been repeated over and over again by psychologists, social commentators and commentators on modern history and music history. Repeated in the very self same way as Josef Goebbels (Hitler’s propaganda Minister) who stated
“Repeat something often enough and it becomes the truth.”
Adolf Hitler himself stated
“By the skilful and sustained use of propaganda, one can make a people see even heaven as hell or an extremely wretched life as paradise.”
Propaganda though is only one method and a very crude one at that.
A number of very great protagonists of this “phenomenon” we find derives from a hegemony of psychology and education.
Names abound in the quest for experimental data in new methods of education and the redefining of education through scientific experiential methods that treat the human being as mere material, like an animal or a resource like minerals and rocks, (aka the use of the term Human Resources).
“As schooling encroaches further and further into family and personal life, monopolizing the development of mind and character, children must become human resources at the disposal of whatever form of governance is dominant at the moment. That in turn confers a huge advantage on the leadership of the moment, allowing it to successfully reproduce itself and foreclose the strength of its competitors.” pg 407 An Underground History of American Education by John Gatto
It is then we find that higher order thinking skills are applied to the development of children as opposed to the naturally defamed name, “lower” order thinking skills (right, wrong, morals and ethics).
This is the same psycho-linguistic depreciation used in Biblical criticism aka “Higher” Criticism and “Lower” Criticism which intimates that the higher is better than the lower.
“…a student attains ‘higher order thinking’ when he no longer believes in right or wrong” Benjamin Bloom, psychologist and educational theorist, in “Major Categories in the Taxonomy of Educational Objectives”, p. 185, 1956
Providing a non exhaustive list of names involved in this process of developing the engineered social changes over the last last 200 years and more we could examine:
B.F Skinner, Carl Rogers, Benjamin Bloom, Warren Bennis, Edward Lee Thorndike, Johann Heinrich Pestalozzi (1746-1827),
Maria Montessori (1870 – 1952), Edward Bernays, Sigmund Freud, Karl Marx, Georg Hegel, Theodor Adorno, Max Horkhiemer
Herbert Marcuse, Walter Benjamin, Paul Larsafeld, George Lukacs, and Karl Korsch (founders of the Institute of Social Research ie: Frankfurt School), Antonio Gramsci
Wilhelm Reich, Rudolph Steiner, Erich Fromm Rudolph Pinter (unpictured) on and on the list goes.
It rapidly becomes stark that we are facing an unnatural, socially manipulated and a generated “gap” when we read from Warren Bennis who was greatly influenced by the National Training Labs research into education curriculum and how to change the minds of children and teachers, founded by Kurt Lewin (Kurt Lewin was greatly influenced by Karl Korsch), (NTL still operational today)
“In order to effect rapid change, . . . [one] must mount a vigorous attack on the family lest the traditions of present generations be preserved. It is necessary, in other words, to artificially create an experiential chasm between parents and children to insulate the children in order that they may be indoctrinated with new ideas―One must teach them not to respect their tradition-bound elders, who are tied to the past and know only what is irrelevant.” “. . . any intervention between parent and child tend to produce familial democracy regardless of its intent.” “The consequence of family democratization take a long time to make themselves felt―but it would be difficult to reverse the process once begun.” “Once the parent can in any way imagine his own orientation to be a possible liability to the child in the world approaching, the authoritarian family is moribund, regardless of whatever countermeasures may be taken.” Warren Bennis, The Temporary Society
Create is the optimal word in that statement. It has been created, it is not natural. Yet contrary to their own philosophy of being “scientific” thus “natural”. (Creativity is a word which possesses multilayer meanings to these movers and shakers.)
Warren Bennis (the above author) and Edgar Schein studied how the Chinese and Koreans brainwashed US soldiers in the Korean War. First by torture and when that didn’t work, the Koreans brought them into groups. Bennis et al did this to find out how to do it more humanely in the classroom.
“The manner in which the prisoner came to be influenced to accept the Communist’s definition of his guilt can best be described by distinguishing two broad phases—(1) a process of “unfreezing” in which the prisoner’s physical resistance, social and emotional supports, self-image and sense of integrity, and basic values and personality were undermined, thereby creating a state of “readiness” to be influenced; and (2) a process of “change” in which the prisoner discovered how the adoption of “the people’s standpoint” and a re-evaluation of himself from this perspective would provide him with a solution to the problems created by the prison pressure. Most were put into a cell containing several who were further along in reforming themselves and who saw it as their primary duty to “help” their most backward member to see the truth about himself in order that the whole cell might advance. Each such cell had a leader who was in close contact with the authorities for purposes of reporting on the cell’s progress and getting advice on how to handle the Western member . . . the environment undermined the (clients) self-image. . . . Once this process of self re-evaluation began, the (client) received all kinds of help and support from the cell mates and once again was able to enter into meaningful emotional relationships with others.” (Warren G. Bennis, Edgar H. Schein, David E. Berlew, and Fred I. Steele, Interpersonal Dynamics: Essays in Readings on Human Interaction)
This is why the culture today has a strong glorification of criminal activity in shows such as the Underbelly series, the celebrity criminal here in Australia like Chopper Reed, glorified Historical figures like Ned Kelly, the explosion of tattoos on the population including women, the general clothing style, and the general criminal attitude and behaviour of so many today. The culture is being framed as per a prison to generate “prison pressure” in the social environment.
Prison is not where someone is sent, prison is where someone is born.
The super structure has long been standing for this “change” of culture and the cultural mind set through “political correctness” also called cultural Marxism via Kulturkampf meaning Culture and kampf likely from the Latin for field likened to the field of battle thus a war on culture1 .
It is thus this pressure to conform for the sake of the child’s future that Bennis calls the authoritarian family “moribund” ie: dead.
It is forced to silence it’s voice of authority, for a “reasonable” “democratic” voice of “equality” where that which is equal rarely possesses the same qualities, thus an oxymoron.
Of course we then see televised examples of this “democratisation” of the family very early on in shows like “The Brady Bunch” and numerous sitcoms for example.
It was the Frankfurt School and the Social Psychologists of the 1930’s who found great use in combining both Karl Marx with Sigmund Freud to establish a new school of Marxist thought called “Transformational Marxism” which was greatly opposed by “Traditional Marxists” who are pretty much gone by the wayside.
As Martin Jay stated
“As the Frankfurt school wrestled with how to “reinvigorate Marx” they “found the missing link in Freud.” The Dialectical Imagination by Martin Jay
In the USA there were also a number of social research institutes established.
1. Sociometric Institute (Now Moreno Institute), formally established in 1942, which grew out of small committees since 1934 [J.L. Moreno & Associates]
2. Research Center for Group Dynamics at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, formally established in 1945 [Kurt Lewin & NTL’s]
3. Department of Social Relations at Harvard University in 1946
4. Tavistock Institute of Human Relations in 1947 [Eric Trist & Bion] (Aldous Huxley was also involved in this. Introducing the drug culture into universities.)
5. Laboratoire d’Experimentation Sociometrique et Psycho-Sociologique at the Sorbonne. http://www.authorityresearch.com/ARTICLES_Other/J%20L%20Moreno%20and%20Role-Playing.htm
It is mostly through mass media and education (schooling, music, tv, movies, novels, comics) that this “gap” has been generated artificially as a thought form or meme, since the thought existed prior to it’s reality. Thus the common title “theory and practice.” The practice came shortly after.
In Hinduism they have symbols that represent sounds which represent vibrations called Biji’s. Aum written, for example is a Biji.
It is this Anglicised thought form that has been created for us named “Generation Gap”. It was an empty term filled with whatever meaning they could generate in it.
It is more than a slogan, more than a cliché, as a thought form we impose the expectation, almost a psychic “invoking” of our children rising up against us in teenage years, almost to the point if not unconsciously provoking, and inspiring our youngsters to perform that very act of self fulfilling prophecy, destructive witchcraft, the inverse of positive thinking(constructive witchcraft which is actually just as wicked, but is the solution being posed for the artificially generated crisis).
Yet we have gone well beyond the dream as we now clearly see the form.
The United States Education system has been so greatly influenced by this way of thinking that they have specific bias against didactic teaching methods, discriminating against it by bringing financial pressure to adopt the new destructive methods
“[R]ather than using rote and didactic methods…new models for
remediation of basic academic skills…shall incorporate appropriate
instructional methods. [Conditions necessary for Federal Grant funds.]”
U.S. Federal Bill S.143 RS, p.187, lines 21-24.
Appropriate is what ever is deemed “appropriate” except what has worked for mankind for thousands of years. Didactic.
What they deem appropriate is the opposite of didactic, instead utilising dialectical methods.
We see the same coercive method from Abraham Maslow in the way Government is to behave towards business and citizens.
“In our democratic society, any enterprise―any individual―has its obligations to the whole.”, “Tax credits would be given to the company that helps to improve the whole society, and helps to improve the democracy by helping to create democratic individuals.” (Abraham Maslow, Maslow on Management)
Definitions are important. Maslow uses the word “improve” but just like the US Federal Grants Bill used the word “appropriate” that is dependant upon what “improve” and “appropriate” mean. The implication of both terms is do they contribute “socially”.
Democracy is also a deceptive term since America is not a democracy but a Republic and Australia is not a democracy but a Constitutional Monarchy. Whenever democracy is used it is used in terms of a socialist system of government. Eg: Peoples Republic of China, Democratic Republic of … etc
I seriously doubt any great invention of the past would have had any Government financial incentive as they all originated from individuals pursuing their “self interests”. Only later, when fully developed, did they have any “social” impact.
Social betterment comes through self development, self interests, and pursuits.
“God and Democracy… stand opposed to each other.” Canadian Justice David M Brown
Whilst we are on the issue of definitions let us continue in that same vein by noting the definition of Education was changed early in the 20th Century. (We will discuss this later).
Explaining some of the prior terms:
Dialectic means 2 or more ie: the group mind in actuality. (The Hive Mind. Social conscience.)
Didactic was one teacher giving you one answer. One truth (Personal conscience).
Dialectic leads to consensus with the group and thus the abandonment of established parental values, absolutes, facts. (AKA Values clarification curriculum. Group Truth.)
Consider James Coleman, who greatly influenced the US Supreme Court decisions on education in the US and in turn has influenced education systems world wide including Australia, writing
“Mass media, and an ever-increasing range of personal experiences, gives an adolescent social sophistication at an early age, making him unfit for the obedient role of the child in the family.” The Adolescent Society by James Coleman
This is why today in education much focus is upon the students learning “experience”, as a mechanism of change not facts.
One of the greatest factors in this process is the entertainment industry. A number of the Frankfurt School went to Hollywood and worked with the industry doing the process through that medium, whilst some others of the Frankfurt school worked with the music industry to also do the process through that medium.
Thus movies, music, gaming, comics and novels not only produce a separation most of the life of a child from the present, creating a virtual world away from parental authority for numerous hours of the day. (Their body is present but the heart and mind are not.)
If you examine the messages, plots, themes, quotes, behaviour of characters, lyrics, lewd dancing, video clips, the intentional chaos of music and the lifestyle of the “stars”, the violence, the imbedded pagan symbolism, let alone the neurological changes that actually take place by the very medium of these media. (I have spent 3+ years dedicated to researching and reading studies into the effects of these devices on the human body, not that anyone cares. That is because knowledge is irrelevant. It’s about feelings, “experience”.)
It is a certain that any family who does not reject these things will continually depart from any “good” and “godly” values they may wish to perpetuate (let alone accentuate) in their young and their own lives. There will be constant conflict in the home between any godliness brought in and the “worldly mind” which is reinforced via media.
“For equality of opportunity to exist, the family as a unit must be weakened.” The Adolescent Society by James Coleman
Equality is an oxymoron as it is made up of two words “equal” and “quality”.
Things and especially people are very unlikely to be equal and do not necessarily have the same quality either. (This is where we can see ISO standards in education. I have noticed this at my kids school where those who are capable students are pulled back to the level of the slow and incapable student. What am I talking about, I saw it happen when I was at school. Gotta have equality, even if it means discriminating against those who have.
In a socialist setting those who have certain qualities must be assisted or penalised to level the playing field to allow “equality of opportunity”.See Goal 3 at http://www.defence.gov.au/code/strategy/strategic-goals.asp
The ADF make Equality of Opportunity very clear in practice. as it says
“Defence recognises and understands that true inclusiveness does not mean treating everyone exactly the same way, all the time.”
Another words selective discrimination all in the name of “equality”, but it discriminates in only one direction.
A recent ad I saw at Central Station platform 25 in August 2015 for the University of Sydney has former Australian Prime Minister Gough Whitlam quoted as saying
“I will champion equal opportunities for all Australians”
Such a philosophy resulted in the removal of one ADF Major Bernard Gaynor who brought to light some clear breaches of ADF policy by ADF personnel involvement in the Gay and Lesbian Mardi Gras while in uniform.
He is now in court facing a $100,000 fine and possible jail time whilst the person who organised the event got a commendation.
(This is occurring in an every expanding and encompassing manner in numerous countries and a simple search will easily make it clear there is a pogrom taking place upon those who hold to absolute beliefs and values. Even this blog could be taken down simply by linking or referencing a site or work considered a violation of antidiscrimination laws.)
Such behaviour in turn removes the incentive to excel from those who have ability and better quality, yet promotes those with no or little ability or quality, and in reality is discrimination or as some term it “reverse discrimination” ( a most strange term indeed.)
(Of course there is no such thing because we almost have a perfect society. Hmm?)
Once again we are dealing with the redefining of terms. We are living with an upside down language. Language creates culture, thus culture is also turned upside down.
It is a form of checks and balances to ensure any children who do happen to chance upon a good upbringing with good parental authority over them, can be put in restraints be it financially, socially, legally, intellectually, emotionally, psychologically, and if possible spiritually. (This is clearly not an exhaustive listing.) This also certainly does not include the elite families of the world.
Take the legal system as an unjust balance in applying “equality of opportunity”. Take a defendant from a good background before a Judge and a defendant with a bad childhood, economically or educationally “disadvantaged” the harsher sentence will be on the defendant with the good background.
This form of “justified” discrimination is called levelling the playing field.
Scripture calls this an “unjust balance”. Exodus 23:2-3; Proverbs 11:1; 20:23.
These same principles apply in the education arena. The mediocritisation of the masses.
Understand though that James Coleman was not the first to embark on such a line of thinking regarding families. He comes from a long line through history. Consider Karl Marx and Sigmund Freud for one moment,
“Once the earthly family [Father, Mother, Child] is discovered to be the secret of the heavenly family [Father, Son and Holy Spirit] , the former must be destroyed in theory and in practice.” (Karl Marx, Feuerbach Thesis # 4) [My comment]
Thus as per Warren Bennis, if the Authoritarian Family is “Moribund” then the father must also be “Moribund”, which is what Sigmund Freud taught
“‘It is not really a decisive matter whether one has killed one’s father or abstained from the deed,’ if the function of the conflict and its consequences are the same.” (Sigmund Freud in Herbert Marcuse, Eros and Civilization)
The power and pressure to compromise affectively and effectively kills the father in a literal cultural sense in a figurative manner most times (literal manner sometimes).
As Freud states “… the consequences are the same” as actually murdering the father. His voice and directive is silenced, in himself and if not certainly within his family.
And yet these are not the first to be proposing such an horrific objective since we find even an earlier call for the undermining of the family in a Masonic letter in 1822
“To propagate light, it is both fit and useful to set everything which aspires to move in motion. The essential thing is to isolate men from their families, to make them lose their morals.” Piccolo Tigre, Letter of January 18, 1822; quoted by Cretineau-Joly, L’eglise romaine en face de la Revolution, XI, 104. Piccolo Tigre is a pseudonym of a Alta Vendita agent. Alta Vendita was high level masonry in the early 1800’s which dominated in the that century. http://www.angelusonline.org/index.php?section=articles&subsection=print_article&article_id=2514
This desired attack on the family is not limited to extremists but the very people and institutions you trust, like Mental Health Professionals,
“The family is now one of the major obstacles to improved mental health, and hence should be weakened, if possible, so as to free individuals and especially children from the coercion of family life.” International Congress on Mental Health, London, 1948
It is far closer to us than we may think.
The Ecology, environmental movement also endorses this mindset,
“No longer is it enough to speak of new techniques for conserving and fostering the natural environment. We must deal with the earth communally, as a human collectively, without the trammels of self-interest, profit, competition and property that have distorted humanity’s vision of life and nature since the break up of tribal society. We must eliminate not only the hierarchy produced by our market-oriented society, but hierarchy as such; not only the patriarchal family, but all modes of gender and parental domination; not only the classes produced by our corporate society but all the social classes and elites.” Murray Bookchin, Ecology and Revolutionary Thought, Youth Greens – Left Green Network, Sept 1990 – Ecology, Anarchism and Green Politics.
That last emboldened section is where we are at now.
You can keep tracing it back further and further and in our current society deeper and deeper. So who is directing whom?
This all should not be surprising then that we find symmetry among the social psychologists.
James S. Coleman, author of the “Adolescent society” was taught under Paul Lazarsfeld born in Austria and a member of the Frankfurt School. Lazarfeld worked with Theodor Adorno on “The Authoritarian Personality”.
(Adolescence is another artificial invention of the social psychologists to obtain access to children whose biological chemicals are starting to change them slowly into adults which requires direction by parents and God, not freedom to experiment! By allowing it’s freedom to run wild you produce a slave class who not only cannot control their passions and impulses, but cannot understand why you should. (Recall the Morlocks and the Eloi in H. G. Wells “The Time machine” Wells was a Fabian Socialist.) Thus John Dewey stated understanding this that
“Impulse, the primary fact, back of which, psychically we cannot go.” (John Dewey, “Social Psychology,” Psychological Review, I, July, 1894.
Other terms used for Impulse are intuition, feeling, need, pleasure and enjoyment which Hegel used the German word for lust.)
We see here that John Dewey (inventor of the Dewey decimal system used in library’s) understood that conscience was the wall through which they must break to obtain a humanistic socialist world order.
That is why it is written in Blooms Taxonomy
“The superego is conceived in psychoanalysis as functioning substantially in the same way as the conscience. Superego development is conceived as the incorporation of the moral standards of society. Therefore the levels of the Taxonomy should describe successive levels of goal setting appropriate to superego development.” (David Krathwohl, Benjamin Bloom et al, Taxonomy of Educational Objectives Book 2: Affective Domain)
The Conscience is opposed to the Superego and they want to develop the Superego in the children.
Another mover and shaker in this field was Canadian psychiatrist G Brock Chisholm whose attitude is displayed in the following statement
“To achieve world government, it is necessary to remove from the minds of men their individualism, loyalty to family traditions, national patriotism and religious dogmas…” G. Brock Chisholm, psychiatrist and co-founder of the World Federation of Mental Health
Mental Health became an issue through which their objective of gaining access to children and the beliefs and values of the people. The US as with other countries law makers passed Mental Health Bills which entered into law
“Few legislators who passed these mental health laws realized that . . . Chisholm and his associates defined mental illness as a sense of loyalty to a particular nation, a sense of loyalty to a moral code, and strict adherence to concepts of right and wrong. Chisholm has been obsessed for years with the idea that instilling concepts of right and wrong, love of country and morality in children by their parents is the paramount evil.” John A. Stormer, None Dare Call it Treason, Chapter IX, Mental Health
G Brock Chisholm’s associate, Dr John Rawlings Rees a British Brigadier General, with whom he was co-founder of the World Federation of Mental Health, was also head of the British Tavistock Clinic.
Rees developed “encounter style strategies” which applied high levels of stress, spirit breaking and psychological conditioning. Field tested techniques for generating“mass neurosis” as developed by Kurt Lewin, and Soviet Psychologist Alexander R Luria who created the “artificial disruption of behaviour” and praised Kurt Lewin for being one of the first to cause “acute disruption of the psyche.” (Kurt Lewin and Lewin’s Institute developed the document and research “Human Relations in Curriculum Change.”)
So successful was Rees that Rockefeller Foundation Medical Director Alan Gregg came to him after WW2 to find whether “anyone would be willing to apply the Army’s enemy-analysis research in social psychiatry to civilian populations. http://www.thenewamerican.com/culture/family/item/495-psychiatry-goes-back-to-the-future
Rees was willing as was Tavistock, receiving a grant from Rockerfeller Foundation and changing the the name to Tavistock Institute of Human Relations in 1948.
Rees stated in 1940 in a speech to the National Council on Mental Hygiene making clear the objective, and the means with which their would achieve it
“… the three main branches of psychiatric work – for the defectives, the psychotics, and the neurotics – the third is probably the most important from the national point of view and certainly here prophylaxis is far more important than treatment.. of this … medico-sociological problem. We must make it permeate every educational activity in our national life: primary, secondary, university and technical education are all concerned with varying stages in the development of the child and the adolescent. Those who provide education, the principles upon which they work, and the people upon whom they work, must all be objects of our interest… Public life, politics and industry should all… be within our sphere of influence… since the last world war we have done much to infiltrate the various social organizations throughout the country… Similarly we have made a useful attack upon a number of professions. The two easiest of them naturally are the teaching profession and the Church: the two most difficult are law and medicine. If we are to infiltrate the professional and social activities of other people I think we must imitate the Totalitarians and organize some kind of fifth column activity! Let us all, therefore, very secretly be “fifth columnists”. We have often been too spasmodic in our work and I feel we need a long term plan of propaganda… we had probably better be secretive and not mention this Council or any other body, but simply write or speak as individuals. Don’t let us mention Mental Hygiene … though we can safely write in terms of mental health and commonsense… attention must not be confined to the Daily Press for there are innumerable weekly and monthly journals and special professional and trade papers… go beyond these more obvious points and… get certain points and ideas… stressed well by well-known novelists in their books… not suggesting… that they should write propaganda novels… but in an ordinary human story it should… give emphasis on a point a view, and the gradual building up of a series of such emphases over a period of years would be the soundest kind of propaganda. This Council has recently been co-operating in some experiments with films, and there the same idea has been emphasized that just one point can be got across to the public through this medium. Many people don’t like to be “saved”, “changed” or made healthy… however… “efficiency and economy” would make rather good appeal because there are few people who would not welcome these two suggestions. “ Mental Health October 1940 Vol 1 No 4 pg 103 – 106, Strategic planning for mental health by Col J R Rees
Let me clarify a few things we just read. Firstly notice that the term Mental Hygiene is a term they wish to steer away from. Why?
Mental Hygiene is merely the internalisation of Adolph Hitler’s removal of the “impure”, instead of physical impurities and ethnic cleansing, the aim is to clean the mind, or brainwash the people, value cleansing or belief cleansing.
Prophylaxis is merely meaning prevention rather than cure. He is saying it is better to raise someone in an environment to prevent conscience, beliefs, morals than have to change someone who has been taught from childhood to have morals and Christian values.
The use of the term “neurotic” is of vast importance and he makes it clear that this is of primary importance. Why?
Sigmund Freud made it clear that a neurotic person is one who has the fathers voice inside them (authoritative voice not opinion), aka has a conscience telling them what is right and wrong and causing evil “guilt” (aka the “neurosis” in the eyes of psychology).
Thus the aim is to focus specially upon the neurotic. Those with a conscience.
As G Brock Chisholm says again
“The re-interpretation and eventually (sic) eradication of the concept of right and wrong which has been the basis of child training, the substitution of intelligent and rational thinking for faith… are the belated objectives of practically all effective psychotherapy. The fact is, that most psychiatrists and psychologists and other respectable people have escaped from these moral chains and are able to observe and think freely.”
Dr. G. Brock Chisholm, 1945
He repeated this same statement again the following year
“…the pretense is made, as it has been made in relation to the finding of any extension of truth, that to do away with right and wrong would produce uncivilized people, immorality, lawlessness and social chaos. The fact is that most psychiatrists and psychologists and other respected people have escaped from moral chains and are able to think freely.” Dr. G. Brock Chisholm Psychiatry: Journal of Biology and Pathology of Interpersonal Relations 9, no. 1, February 1946
We are going to see more of this elimination of right and wrong, morality and conscience as we move on. No argument is required to refute his statement.
We hear this parroted at the 2003 MTV Music Awards when Madonna, Britney Spears and Christina Aguilera have a 3 way lesbian wedding and sing
“We are bored of the concept of right and wrong.” Like A Virgin / Hollywood Medley (2003 MTV VMA Performance) (feat. Christina Aguilera, Britney Spears & Missy Elliott)
The media pushing the plan as a 5th Column.
Merely examine politicians, the medical establishment, the mental health industry and other “respected people” and how the unanimous cry of disgust comes from every quarters of society concerning those “respected” yet clearly operate with now qualms or restraint
One example of how scientific socialism was used to change both the medical and legal establishment in one foul swoop was with Alfred Kinsey and his Institute for Sex Research now called the Kinsey Institute for Research in Sex, Gender and Reproduction (now with UN Consultative status).
A 2004 report was put out by 2400 US lawmakers called
“Restoring Legal Protections for Women and Children: A Historical Analysis of The States’ Criminal Codes,” these lawmakers detailed how Kinsey, whom they called, “a pornography-addicted, sadomasochistic, bi/homosexual pedophile propagandist,” was able to launch the sexual revolution, reduce sex crime penalties and sabotage American sex law. The report reveals that “Since World War II Kinsey‘s fraudulent data informed and directed the American Law Institute‘s (ALI) Model Penal Code in eliminating and weakening 52 U.S. sex-related laws that once protected marriage.” http://www.stopthekinseyinstitute.org/kinsey-brief/
Scary times are upon us.
In 1933 around 21 men left the Institute of Social Research at Frankfurt, Germany (The Frankfurt School) when Adolf Hitler became Chancellor. Most of them went to America and took up positions in US Universities and taught the disciples of the next generation of Transformational Marxists / Social Psychologists. (Transformational Marxist being a fusing of Karl Marx with Sigmund Freud aka Mikhail Gorbachev and Al Gore.)
Thus we see where James S. Coleman obtained his ideology.
We can see clearly then the results were rapidly implemented as the intellectual elite had cornered academia in both psychology and education, and implementation took place as our system of governance moved towards “scientific socialism” (rulership by experts), the mid stage before Communism (Community ism – Common – Unity). As Fromm called it “communitarian socialism”.
Kurt Lewin published a book “Frustration and Regression: An Experiment with young children”. In this book published 1941 we read
“… change in organization can be derived from the overlapping between play and barrier behavior . To be governed by two strong goals is equivalent to the existence of two conflicting controlling heads within the organism. This should lead to a decrease in degree of hierarchical organization. Also, a certain disorganization should result from the fact that the cognitive-motor system loses to some degree its character of a good medium because of these conflicting heads . It ceases to be in a state of near equilibrium; the forces under the control of one head have to counteract the forces of the other before they are effective.” (Barker, Dembo, & Lewin, “frustration and regression: an experiment with young children” found in Child Behavior and Development, p. 457.)
The two conflicting heads referred to is the authoritarian head of the family, the parent, a father and or God to which the will (ego) is in bondage (thus according to Freud causes neurosis, aka the neurotic), and the other head is the loosing and elevation of the inner desires (Id) to the same level of authority termed “equilibrium” so the child can be equipped with tools (self justification) to “counteract” their parents / Gods voice inside (aka: the conscience) and become self-actualised.
Fancy words to bore the common man and confuse unlearned.
The Apostle Paul spoke about this in his letter to the Romans
“For I know that in me (that is, in my flesh,) dwelleth no good thing: for to will is present with me; but how to perform that which is good I find not. For the good that I would I do not: but the evil which I would not, that I do. Now if I do that I would not, it is no more I that do it, but sin that dwelleth in me. I find then a law, that, when I would do good, evil is present with me. For I delight in the law of God after the inward man: But I see another law in my members, warring against the law of my mind, and bringing me into captivity to the law of sin which is in my members. O wretched man that I am! who shall deliver me from the body of this death? I thank God through Jesus Christ our Lord. So then with the mind I myself serve the law of God; but with the flesh the law of sin.”
The “no good thing” within is what the Social Psychologists want out as the Super ego, and getting this out is what becoming Self-Actualised means the Ego and the Id unite.
Notice there are two heads, the Flesh and Spirit warring against one another.
Notice too there is a war present here on earth which you will see we are sending ill equipped children right into the heat of battle, their classrooms.
In 1956 Benjamin Bloom completed and edited The Taxonomy of Educational Objectives Book 1 Cognitive Domain and completed Book 2 Affective Domain in 1964. These works drew from the experimental work done in the education training labs.
We are told in Book 2
“… the Taxonomy will provide a bridge for further communication among teachers and between teachers and evaluators, curriculum research workers, psychologists, and other behavioral scientists (aka a soviet)… As this communication process develops it is likely that the ‘fulklure’… can be replaced by a somewhat more precise understanding of how affective behaviors develop, how and when they can be modified, and what the school can and cannot do to develop them in particular forms.”, “we need to provide the range of emotion from neutrality through mild to strong emotion, probably of a positive, but also of a negative kind.” “… organized into value systems and philosophies of life.” David Krathwohl, Benjamin Bloom et al. Taxonomy of Educational Objectives Book 2: Affective Domain
Another words how to elicit an emotional response in the student for the purpose of constructing a value and philosophical belief system.
These books were a reworking of Kenneth Benee’s “Human Relations In Curriculum Change” and were based upon numerous works including the work of Theodor Adorno’s “The Authoritarian Personality” which claimed regarding educational curricula
““Social environmental forces must be used to change the parents behavior toward the child.” “The scientific study of ideology can only be made on the basis of theory [upon the children’s opinions rather than upon the parent’s beliefs].” “. . . as the present study has shown, we are dealing with a structure within the person it seems that we should consider, first, psychological techniques for changing personality.” “The problem is one which requires the efforts of all social scientists . . . the councils or round tables . . . psychologists should have a voice.” “A natural step in the present study, therefore, was to conceive of a continuum extending from extreme conservatism to extreme liberalism and to construct a scale [construct a socio-psychological “taxonomy”] which would place individuals along this continuum.” (Theodor Adorno The Authoritarian Personality) from Dean Gotcher A precis of Blooms taxonomy. http://www.authorityresearch.com/2010-01%20A%20precis%20of%20Blooms%20Taxonomy.htm”
Thus this means to classify students psychologically into a graph that places them ideologically on a scale of “authoritarian” to a thinker or feeler aka group mind.
This is why Abraham Maslow states
“The first thing I do with authoritarians is break their backs and treat them like the bastards they are”.
If we look more closely at one of the most globally influential texts on curriculum formation since the 1950’s, Benjamin Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives Book 1 and 2, we see it is strongly based upon Theodor Adorno’s “Authoritarian Personality”. Bloom himself admits as much in Book 2 page 166 when he uses the German word “Weltanschaaung”, meaning “world view” and claims the Taxonomies obtain this world view from Theodor Adorno and Eric Fromm.
So it is important to remember that when reading Fromm or Adorno’s quotes, you are reading the two men who formed Benjamin Bloom’s “world view” or “paradigm” for his Taxonomy of Educational Objectives.
Thus we find this same philosophy as expressed by Adorno above, not just permeating but lying blatantly on the surface of the Taxonomies for anyone to see.
“Meyers in his study emphasizing group think, Higher Horizons 1961, stated that ‘to develop attitudes and values toward learning which are not shaped by the parents and guardians or by the peer group in the neighborhood’ produces ‘conflict and tension between parents and children, between students, and peer groups who are not participating in the special opportunities.” David Krathwohl, Benjamin Bloom et al. Taxonomy of Educational Objectives Book 2: Affective Domain
This is setting the world on fire, setting everyone in a home and neighbourhood (different to community) against each other including individual kids and “gangs” pitted against each other (aka bullying as a means to change the individual, crime as a means to change the community). This system is divisive.
This explains the current situation I have noticed at my children’s school, who have a “no tolerance” policy for bullying and yet the clear message sent to the kids in the playground is that the bullies are the ones who get away with their behaviour and anyone who physically or verbally stands up to them gets punished as though they were the bully.
That is Prison Pressure!
The problem with bullying is not to be solved but like in all matters, rather used as the catalyst to get other kids and families to participate in the “process” of change, using our tax money to perform their ongoing social experiment. Just like how the issue of eliminating crime is no longer the issue, but rather how to use crime to change the “community”.
This also explains why there is a significant divide in the older kids years, between the “group” and a handful of “individuals”, or as Bloom says causes“conflict and tension between… students and peer groups”. The group has been “changed” into the One “peer group” the Justifying Mind, whilst the individual “students” Weltanschaaung still hold to a right wrong, Dad said paradigm.
We should blame ourselves for not paying enough interest in these matters and instead loving our entertainment, so don’t blame the teachers (leave them to blame themselves) since they are only taught part of Book 2 on how to do the process and not Book 1 which explains the objectives which
“… is a taxonomy of psychology. ”pg 6 Taxonomy of Educational Objectives Book 1 Cognitive Domain 1956 by Benjamin Bloom
Another words this major book that is used as a primary foundation for establishing the curricula world wide (including Communist China where 1,000,000 of Bloom’s Taxonomy were printed for Communist China in 1971 and used in their education system.) is a taxonomy of your child’s mind, feelings and attitude’s and inner thoughts. (The thought police in reality.)
As Theodor Ardono says
“The individual may have ‘secret’ thoughts which he will under no circumstances reveal to anyone else if he can help it. To gain access is particularly important, for here may lie the individual’s potential.” Theodor Adorno, The Authoritarian Personality
The psychological methods used in this book are the methods developed by the sociology institutes set up by J L Moreno and Kurt Lewin. This is principally Role Play, Group Dynamics respectively and applies the principles of Unfreeze, Move (Change), Refreeze. (Role play is not acting or imitating as it involves emotions (affective domain). It is these methods that participants at the institute of Bethel Maine had to sign a declaimer that they would not sue in the event of mental breakdown (some were committing suicide after these group encounters). This is because every person who goes through this process has to go through “the suicide zone” when dislocated from the Father’s authority and moved toward group think aka consensus. It places the issue of suicide in the western nations in a new light. Particularly with kids.)
So what is it to taxonomise?
Taxonomising is what you do to things, stuff, resources, rocks etc. You classify them for the purpose of being able to manipulate them and change the resource into what ever usable form desired. Resources that are not changeable (subject to innovations) are classified as junk.
“It has been pointed out that we are attempting to classify phenomena which could not be observed or manipulated in the same concrete form as the phenomena of such fields as the physical and biological sciences.” pg 5, Taxonomy of Educational Objectives Book 1 Cognitive Domain 1956 by Benjamin Bloom
Thus in this dehumanising application of applying higher order thinking skills to human beings who are considered a Human Resource today, it classifies the psychological aspects of children to alert the teacher to what values and beliefs children need to “change” or manipulate, to become part of the group or “community” (aka Fromm’s “communitarian socialism) and be self-actualised.
As explained previously self-actualising is eliminating guilt by getting rid of negation which is getting rid of the fathers / Fathers voice so self and group justification can take place and consensus can be reached.
As Bloom states
“What we are classifying is the intended behavior of students—the ways in which individuals are to act, think, or feel as the result of participating in some unit of instruction.” Taxonomy of Educational Objectives Book 1 Cognitive Domain 1956 by Benjamin Bloom
This is important because the more information you have on a person and the powers that psychology has brought to marketing, we can see how easy it is to move an innocent child still developing abilities to think and naturally trust and hold faith in their teacher.
(I use the term move in the concept later discussed as Unfreeze, Move, Refreeze.)
So it places in a new light “homework” that is called “All About Me” for example where the child has to write about who are in their family, what they do, etc. Personal details that assuredly assist in “taxonomising” the child for a program of change.
Jesus said in Matthew 18:2-5
“And Jesus called a little child unto him, and set him in the midst of them, And said, Verily I say unto you, Except ye be converted, and become as little children, ye shall not enter into the kingdom of heaven. Whosoever therefore shall humble himself as this little child, the same is greatest in the kingdom of heaven. And whoso shall receive one such little child in my name receiveth me.”
Why? Because children naturally gravitate toward faith in the “authoritarian personality” the father, the parents, the policeman, the teacher, God etc.
We are a society of rock spiders who allow and prey upon the trusting nature and innocence of children. This attitude and motivation is no different to sexual predators but we pretend we are so much better when the very attitudes that justify the actions of a paedophile are the same attitudes that justify what we all do to them emotionally and mentally in the culture and the classroom so we can have our pleasure in our society.
There is very little difference between what we have been doing the last 70 years and what a Lucifarian or Satanist family does to traumatise their children so they can go beyond and get in touch with their “gifts”, possess alternate personalities with different skill sets and abilities and possess considerable controls over the individual.
In Twenty Two Faces: Inside the Extraordinary Life of Jenny Hill and Her Twenty Two Multiple Personalities by Judy Byington, it speaks about this
She was a guardian constantly fighting for dominance while acting as a big sister, plus a mother to an alter family. Though, she had the mindset of a child who was often troubled at her inability to manage situations. That position would be further challenged as the identity grew up: more acts of violence occurred, subsequent personalities came from her, plus new head alters and their own families were born–each with their own unique verbal skills and performance abilities depending upon the specific situation from which they were formed. pg 11
If you dare to examine Satanic Ritual Abuse you will find that all that has been taking place is as Dean Gotcher calls it “Secularised Satanism” or “Scientific Witchcraft”. The techniques have been sanitised with the objective to to make your child reach full potential and bloom (no pun intended).
Bloom’s Taxonomy then is an instruction manual in psychological predation.
Jesus made it clear in verse 6
“But whoso shall offend one of these little ones which believe in me, it were better for him that a millstone were hanged about his neck, and that he were drowned in the depth of the sea.”
This is nothing short of criminal (for what is the purpose of education but to teach facts and how to find facts – didactic teaching) and yet there it is on page 6 of Book 1 and we have been doing it for over 60 years. Who gave teachers or the state the right to classify, challenge and change / manipulate the beliefs and values of children and turn them against their parents?
This is a clear act of aggression and war against the people and generations of children by their governments. Psychological warfare is still warfare.
This same viewpoint is echoed in a more in your face form Dr Chester M Pierce speaking about Americans stating
“…every child in America entering school at the age of five is insane because he comes to school with certain allegiances toward our Founding Fathers, toward his parents, toward a belief in a supernatural being, toward the sovereignty of this nation as a separate entity…It’s up to you [Psychologists and Psychiatrists] to make all these sick children well….” Dr. Chester M. Pierce, Harvard Univ. keynote address to Assoc. for Childhood Education International Colorado. 1972
This is clearly emphasised again but in a more intellectual manner by Theodor Adorno writing
“God is conceived more directly after a parental image and thus as a source of support and as a guiding and sometimes punishing authority.” “The conception of the ideal family situation for the child: 1) uncritical obedience to the father and elders, 2) pressures directed unilaterally from above to below, 3) inhibition of spontaneity, and 4) emphasis on conformity to externally imposed values.” “The power-relationship between the parents, the domination of the subject’s family by the father or by the mother, and their relative dominance in specific areas of life also seemed of importance for our problem.” “The prototypic ‘liberal’ is . . . an individual who actively seeks progressive social change, who can be militantly critical (though not necessarily totally rejective) of the present status quo,” “One of the primary functions of these [matter-of-fact] questions was to encourage the subject to talk freely. This was attempted by indicating, for example, that critical remarks about parents were perfectly in place, thus reducing defences as well as feelings of guilt and anxiety.” The Authoritarian Personality by Theodor Adorno.
As Bloom stated, the ways individuals are to act, think or feel. That is the role of God and the parent not the school, teachers and Government. (In fact you will see that for a bunch of godless “scientists” they all seem very interested in God, the Bible, Jesus Christ, the Serpent and the Garden, the Tree of Knowledge, Morals and Values, etc etc as you will see.)
“I see the revolutionary destruction of society as the one and only solution. A worldwide overturning of values can not take place without the annihilation of the old values and a creation of the new ones by the Revolution.” – Georg Luckacs (co-founder with Karl Korsch of the Social Research Institute aka Frankfurt School)
How is it that very few have noticed this in the classroom?
Well this has happened because very few even realise this, especially the teachers.
The concept is called “Hidden in Plain Sight”.
In fact Benjamin Bloom and his associates were quite concerned about being careful who reads the Taxonomy else it be exposed. Thus the material is not to be studied only to be applied.
Yet the fact they are not sure it really is scientific is even admitted in Book 2 of the Taxonomy
“Whether or not the classification scheme presented in Handbook I: Cognitive Domain is a true taxonomy is still far from clear.” Affective Domain: Book 2 p. 11, Taxonomy of Educational Objectives Book 2 Affective Domain 1964 by Benjamin Bloom
This is eight years after Book 1.
Bloom even admits forty years on that
“… the Taxonomy was unproved at the time it was developed and may well be ‘unprovable.'” (Benjamin Bloom, Forty Year Evaluation)
This means my wife and I and now our kids are involved in a life long social experiment to which my wife and I nor our parents were ever asked to participate. How about you and your kids?
This violates Appendix 6 of the Nuremberg Code which states
“The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential.”
Kenneth Benne writes the same as Bloom stating
“No hypothesis in this body of writings has been fully tested. Nor will it be tested fully until it has been used widely in thoughtful experimentation with actual social changes. The school offers an important potential laboratory for the development of a truly experimental social science. Experimentally minded school workers can develop and improve the hypotheses suggested in these readings as they put them to the test in planning and evaluating changes in the school program.” pg IX Kenneth Benne, Human Relations in Curriculum Change.
Why was it ever implemented without being fully tested? And why test it if you do not know the outcome till you obtain “actual social changes.”
That is insanity unless the worldview is that any outcome is better than the one we have, aka a Judeo Christian foundation of morals and behaviour. We find that is in fact the case.
The “Human Relations in Curriculum Change” also acknowledges some important names and techniques
“The work of the National Training Laboratory in Group Development, sponsored by the National Education Association and the Research Centre for Group Dynamics, University of Michigan, has helped to advance our understanding of group development in the interrelated contexts of training, research and social action. This latter work has built in some large part upon the frontier theorizing of Kurt Lewin and his associates.
The editors make special acknowledgment to Dr. J. L. Moreno, who has pioneered in the areas currently referred to as psychodrama, sociodrama, role-playing, action dynamics, warming-up technique, group psychotherapy and sociometry, and who first introduced these terms into the literature…”
This work ended up requiring those undergoing the “training” in these laboratory’s, be they teachers or children to sign a disclaimer that they would not sue in the event of suicide, as participants were going back to their hotel rooms after participation committing suicide and having mental breakdowns. It is admitted what they were doing regarding changing values for,
“… the approach to human engineering which has guided the editors in compiling this volume is not a “valuefree” approach. No attempt to engineer changes in people and social systems is without some value system, whether explicit or implicit.” pg IX Kenneth Benne, Human Relations in Curriculum Change.
Thus we should be aware that no curriculum is “value free”. So we should have always been asking, what values and beliefs is it teaching?
We find Socialist and Zionist founder Moses Hess in his Communist Credo,
“34. How does one guarantee people’s freedom and their true property or
This happens primarily through education.
35. What is understood by education?
First of all, bodily development, which is the foundation for any further
development: it begins in the mother’s womb. Secondly, the general
human education in public institutions, where the seeds are sown and
taken care of for any human virtue and faculty. From these institutions
pupils graduate and are introduced to those fields of activity for which
they possess the greatest inclination and the best talents. Here human
social education is being perfected.” pg 121 The Holy History of Mankind and other writings by Moses Hess edited by Sholomo Avineri.
Hess is clearly specifying “social education”. He again on pg 123 emphasises social education for educating the youth to abandon private property
We will understand what is meant by guaranteeing freedom when we read B.F. Skinner.
Mark their words, a school is a laboratory, in every class taken with every student involved which comes into contact with influences to change their values from the ones that we as parents gave them or are giving them.
Lord Bertrand Russell wrote about this very thing in “The Future of Science”,
“I think the subject that will be of the most importance politically is mass psychology…. The social psychologists of the future will have a number of classes of school children on whom they will try different methods of producing an unshakable conviction that snow is black. Various results will soon be arrived at: first, that influences of the home are obstructive. Second, that not much can be done unless indoctrination begins before the age of ten….It is for the future scientist to make these maxims precise and discover exactly how much it costs per head to make children believe that snow is black. When the technique has been perfected, every government that has been in charge of education for more than one generation will be able to control its subjects securely without the need of armies of policemen.” http://www.angelusonline.org/index.php?section=articles&subsection=print_article&article_id=2514
We have already seen Adolf Hitler mirror that exact same sentiment as “snow is black”
“… see even heaven as hell or an extremely wretched life as paradise.”
A Jesuit motto also has the similar belief supposedly coming from St Francis Xavier stating
“Give me a child until he is seven and I will give you the man.”
This certainly explains why something as simple as teaching maths and reading and writing is ludicrously expensive, requiring huge budgets. It is not about the cost of education but the costs associated with changing values and beliefs. As Bertrand Russell said “costs per head to believe snow is black.”
Yet it’s too late. they’ve done it, obtained the results and have implemented the process generations ago, if you refer to the list I provided at the beginning regarding social research institutes, and those are only some in the US.
We saw the “actual social changes” in the 1960’s, and this has persisted ever since.
One great aspect of this “change” is the Generation Gap. And as we can already see it has been manufactured.
The current culture of “change” or “innovation” is seen in the persistent culture of change, go down the road and you find things changed over night, company logos and billboards, public phones removed, go to an aisle in your supermarket and everything has been relocated, go to buy your favourite brand or product to find it has been taken off the market or no longer stocked etc.
The picture below is an example of this being done in plain sight.
Innovation as a synonym for change.
Community is a social psychological term compounded from common and unity. The community is a nebulas term akin to society. These are words of the dialectic.
Let’s just take a moment to look at these words.
Sustainability is code for those who are worthy to survive into the New Age because they “adapted”, “changed”. Those who change (compromise, abandon values and beliefs) will pass through the coming “revolution” into the New World Order.
We see this from author and New Ager Neale Donald Walsch who claims to talk to God and God talks to him,
“Life will change its form (that is, adapt Itself to become sustainable) before it will allow any Part of Life to render Life Itself dysfunctional. And so you will see individuals who ignore the most important and functional messages of Life changing form. To put this in your own terms, they will die.” pg 96 Tomorrows God Neale Donald Walsch.
(Thus the words “Purpose”, “Driven”, “Life” all find completion of meaning within this “Weltanschaaung”.)
“Now your thought that Hitler was a monster is based on the fact that he ordered the killing of millions of people, correct?… Yet what if I told you that what you call ‘death’ is the greatest thing that could happen to anyone-what then?” Neale Donald Walsch, Conversations with God Book 2 pg 36.
Tell that to the tens of millions killed in WW2.
Clearly Neale Donald Walsch’s “God” is a devil.
He also discusses abandoning values in favour of pragmatism of change, stating
“The first step for us as a society as we evolve is to abandon our values. The people who have their feet in the mud, who are ‘stuck’, are railing against this.
They say that we are building a society without values, that we are abandoning our values. Well, we are abandoning our values. We ought to abandon our values. We ought to have only one value. What is it that’s working? What works? And that assessment is dependent on what your trying to do.”Neale Donald Walsch and Dr Brad Blanton – Honest to God: A Change of Heart That Can Change the World pg 88- 89.
It is interesting that he states “what works”. This is parallel to what Dr John Rawling Rees stated in his 1940’s speech “efficiency and economy would make rather good appeal”. Pragmatism.
You may be wondering why I am quoting from this madman? You will see that in time it will become clear that the process is leading us into a spiritual “Weltanschaaung”. This is the “secret” meaning and outcomes behind these esoteric words.
That book title is incredibly curious too, “A change of Heart that can Change the World” is distinctly like Karl Marx who wrote
“Philosophers have hitherto only interpreted the world in various ways; the point is to change it.” Karl Marx Theses on Feuerbach #11
refuse to change and insist on “separation” (refusing the many becoming one) as stated by her spirit guide in 1980,
“We come to bring death to those who are unable to know God… The riders of the pale horse are about to pass among you. Grim reapers, they will separate the wheat from the chaff. This is the most painful period in the history of humanity.’ pg 321 False Dawn from pg 60-61 Barbara Marx Hubbard Co-Creation: An Evolutionary Interpretation of the New Testament
“All those… maintaining that illusion of separation, will become extinct… Just as Cro-Magnon and Neanderthal humans became extinct…” Barbara Marx Hubbard ‘Happy Birthday Planet Earth pg 17.3
The murderous intent lies waiting behind the patient “change agents” smile since most will
“… accept the new system of values and beliefs by accepting belongingness to the group.” Kurt Lewin in Human Relations in Curriculum Change.
Carl Rogers also claims the same saying
“New facts and values have to be accepted as action ideology [aka practise and theory] involved in that particular frequently non conscious system of values that guides conduct [aka the super ego]”.
A “non conscious system of values” is the superego, the law of the flesh, the law of sin. That which comes naturally to mans nature.
Quoting the Education for Sustainability Toolkit 2006 as another example of this
“Perhaps one of the greatest expenses of implementing ESD will come with providing appropriate basic education. Basic goals, which were established at Jontiem [Thailand] and reaffirmed at Dakar, include educating more children and increasing the universal average minimum of schooling to six years. Meeting these goals will require hiring many more teachers. These new teachers must be trained, and current teachers must be retrained, to reorient their curriculum’s to address sustainability… Reorienting education to address sustainability will require new financial resources. One of the major problems with ESD is that current education must continue while the new curriculum is being designed and developed.” pg 36
No one must escape the process, as Georg Hegel puts it, as does Behavioral Eugenist, Paul Popenoe of the early Mental Health Movement
“The educational system should be a sieve, through which all the children of a country are passed. It is highly desirable that no child escape inspection.”
Paul Popenoe, co-author Sterilization for Humans.
Terms like “retrained”, or “reorientated”, are just other ways of saying “re-educated” which is brainwashing.
Notice that just like Karl Marx who says the “educator must be educated” the toolkit says the same, “current teachers must be re-trained” this is what “life long education” is about.
“… the concept of the world as the totality of facts is connected with a correspondence notion of truth and a semantic conception of justification. The social world, as the totality of legitimately ordered interpersonal relations, is accessible only from the participant’s perspective; in the pragmatic presuppositions of rational discourse or deliberation the normative content of the implicit assumptions of communicative action is generalized, abstracted, and freed from all limits — the practice of deliberation is extended to an inclusive community that does not in principle exclude any subject capable of speech and action who can make relevant contributions. This idea points to a way out of the modern dilemma, since the participants have lost their metaphysical guarantees and must so to speak derive their normative orientations from themselves alone [get them off their foundation, moors, authorities, into self justification and opinions]. As we have seen, the participants can only draw on those features of a common practice they already currently share…. [Common-ism] The bottom line is that the participants have all already entered into the cooperative enterprise of rational discourse. The practice of argumentation sets in motion a cooperative competition for the better argument [the individual has moved from position to opinion, so he who knows how to argue best wins], where the orientation to the goal of a communicatively reached agreement unites the participants from the outset.” Jürgen Habermas 1998 Communicative Ethics The inclusion of the Other. Studies in Political Theory.
So once you have embarked upon this process, you become committed to your opinion and argue against other opinions, where no one is right or wrong (“metaphysical guarantees” are “lost”, religious / spiritual beliefs and values are abandoned). Yet isn’t this supposed to be only a humanistic, materialistic pursuit. Why is the target moralistic / religious beliefs and values?
It is important to see Benjamin Bloom et al, understood this fact,
“One’s beliefs, attitudes, values , and personality characteristics are more likely to be regarded as private matters… ‘My attitudes toward God, home and family are private concerns.’ The public-private status of cognitive vs. affective behaviors is deeply rooted in the Judaeo-Christian religion and is a value highly cherished in the democratic traditions of the Western world.” pg 18 Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: Book 2 Affective Domain, Krathwohl, Bloom.
Thus cognitive is in this instance the Judaeo-Christian religion vs. affective behaviors. Thus Blooms Taxonomy makes it clear it is at war with the Western Culture and religion.
We are seeing today the uniting of private and public into partnerships like the NSW Government’s PPP Train project. http://www.transport.nsw.gov.au/projects-waratah-public-private-partnership.
Another Public Private Partnership taken place is at Melbourne Magistrates Court where the security and building is leased to the Department of Justice and run by a Chinese corporation backed by Rothschild.
It is the final sell off of the peoples assets without their consent. 2 – 3 Generations ago the people were told their taxes would build their own Bank, Utilities, Transportation, Roads etc. Now they are told they need to be sold. Theft by gradualism.
Just type PPP project NSW etc and you will find there are countless projects.
Once that which is Private is linked with that which is Public, All becomes Public and thus subject to the litmus test of the group for now all are effected and that which was private is now everyone’s concern.
Now change can commence.
It then should be seen that as Bloom mentions “private concerns” as “God”, “Home” and “family”, by invoking “public-private status” he effects the transplantation of the private realm of the family into the realm of being everyone’s concern. Thus your child’s beliefs about God, Home and family is now a social concern, not yours.
Thus the growing popularity of the cliché “It takes a village to raise a child”, an African proverb that comes out of the animistic religious beliefs of “socialist” African tribes.
Remember Theodor Adorno spoke about accessing your child’s “secrets thoughts” this is the realm of “private”.
Thus to access the moral and religious beliefs held in private or secret to pit them against the thoughts and feelings of the children in the lab/classroom. What does this have to do with education. What does this have to do with higher thinking skills which is dealing with rocks and “stuff”, not beliefs of individuals. There is a clear bait and switch that has taken place and virtually no one has even noticed.
“Thy word have I hid in mine heart, that I might not sin against thee.”
The objective is to get it out and mock the life out of the child who holds it.
“The civilised world has been thoroughly saturated with Christianity for 2000 years, any country grounded in Christian values cannot be overthrown therefore, until those roots are cut, but to cut the roots, to change culture, a long march through the institutions is necessary. Only then will power fall into our laps like ripened fruit.” – Antonio Gramsci
Why are these people so obsessed with peoples religion? Especially Christianity?
We are slowly swallowing the deadly poison, gradual step by gradual step. I hazard to call it a Trinary agent. (A poison requiring 3 parts, but as long as you have even one part in you, you are at risk of ingesting the other two.)
This process has seen the decline of the church ever more rapidly over the last 60 years, of which Theodor Adorno’s following statement seems most apt
“Few parents can be expected to persist for long in educating their children for a society that does not exist, or even in orienting themselves toward goals which they share only with a minority.” Theodor Adorno, The Authoritarian Personality
He is completely correct. For most to hold to their “old world” values and beliefs, which were merely trappings of social acceptance and not truly personal conviction, and thus suffer being an outsider, socially, financially, politically, religiously, academically, etc, is simply not going to happen. They will “reorient” themselves to “fit in” and move in the path of least resistance.
Simple physics for simple mindless atoms. Simple social physics for simple mindless herds too.
Catch Words are everywhere.
Such “catch words” like “innovation”, “community”, “sustainability”, re-orienting” etc or “words of power” are spoken of by occultist Alice Bailey in her book Esoteric Psychology volume 2,
“Members of the New Group of World Servers learn mostly through the ear
and through that careful attention which comes from an inner attitude of
constant listening. They are unfolding that spiritual perception which is latent
but unused in the average man. They have to catch the new Words of Power as they come forth from the centre of spiritual light and force in the world and, at the same time, they must be attentive to the cry of humanity as it voices its highest hopes, longings and desires. This attitude of listening and of a subsequent prompt readjustment of the inner, received commands, is
characteristic of the New Group of World Servers. The mass of people whom
they will eventually gather around them must be taught, and learn through the eye, through the printed page, and later through a sensing of the vision. These two points must be remembered in planning the work and in finding the workers.” pg 322 – 323 Esoteric Psychology Vol 2 by Alice Bailey.
Back in the late 1980’s I remember a guy called Barry Smith who spoke about the changes coming in society and that as we move forward in time the rate of change would increase to a breakneck speed. This is about creating a era of confusion and abdication, that you cannot participate in the system except through rote gestures and might as well just buckle up, shrug your shoulders, do you job, go home, and live your life, have some pleasure then die.
Who can keep pace with State and Federal bills that fly through with reams of multitudinous pages for example. The pace of change is to over burdening for politicians that it is no wonder that it is so easy to sneak through “changes” say on page 601, just as one example. Who can read a 500 page bill. Who can read several 500 page bills in a week?
I created the Above Diagram to show a number of facets of taking one from their position through the process towards the new position. Hopefully it demonstrates this and simplifies what this article discusses.
The era of confusion is about the transition from the conscience within, to the consensus without (the social conscience) and confusion/chaos is the only way through it.
“The materialist doctrine that men are products of circumstances and upbringing, and that, therefore, changed men are products of changed circumstances and changed upbringing, forgets that it is men who change circumstances and that the educator must himself be educated. Hence this doctrine is bound to divide society into two parts, one of which is superior to society. The coincidence of the changing of circumstances and of human activity or self-change [Selbstveränderung] can be conceived and rationally understood only as revolutionary practice… Philosophers have hitherto only interpreted the world in various ways; the point is to change it.” Karl Marx Theses on Feuerbach
Moses Hess also made a similar statement writing
“Change, the differentiating of life, cannot be taken to be a change of the law of activity, an objective differentiating of life, but can be considered only a differentiating of self-consciousness.” Philosophy of the Act by Moses Hess
It isn’t just about changing how you live it’s about changing why you live.
The educators themselves do not realise they too have been engineered.
The wisdom of the author of Ecclesiastes 1:9 says there is nothing new under the sun and wisely warns us in Proverbs 24:2
“My son, fear thou the LORD and the king: and meddle not with them that are given to change:”
A clear clarion call to all involved, and all who look to overthrow everything.
Notice that Marx mentions those “superior to society”. It is these who are the self justified change agents, the leadership and directors of the “scientific socialism” prior to final stage. There is an us and them. As George Orwell shows us in Animal Farm, some are more equal than others. ie: “Equality of opportunity”.
People have frequently queried the use of the term “them” or “they” by what they mockingly call such users as paranoid schizophrenics.
Well here you can now understand who “they” are whilst it is still used in a nebulous sense for those you have not found out about yet.
This is why each new generation must be changed and made different from the former generation by leaps and bounds and the means to obtain change is found where
“The affective [feeling] domain contains the forces that determine the nature of an individual’s life and ultimately the life of an entire people” Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: Book II Affective Domain
Another words Benjamin Bloom is saying that this won’t just change individuals, it will change the nations. Frederich Engles, wrote about a great change of nations stating
“All the…large and small nationalities are destined to perish…in the revolutionary world storm… [and] wipe out all…nations, down to their very names. The next world war will result in the disappearance from the face of the earth not only reactionary classes…but…reactionary peoples.” (“The Magyar Struggle,” Neue Rheinische Zeitung, Jan. 13, 1849) http://amos37.com/2010/11/15/cultural-marxism-exposed/
Though the outcome did not come to full fruition as Engles had stated, it certainly found it’s beginnings in the creation of the League of Nations after the conclusion of World War 1.
This changing “… the life on an entire people” was a matter “hidden in plain sight”. A typical means used as concealment.
The US Federal Government funded Ronald Havelock’s book “The Change Agents Guide to Innovation in Education” where innovation is another word for change.
“[a] change agent… should know about the process of change, how it takes place and the attitudes, values and behaviors that usually act as barriers…. He should know who in his system are the ‘defenders’ or resisters of innovations.” Ronald Havelock The Change Agents Guide to Innovation in Education
What sort of “innovations” are we talking about, what “changes”?
Discovering what the Taxonomies and Social Psychologists intend we should be most concerned.
“To create effectively a new set of attitudes and values, the individual must undergo great reorganization of his personal beliefs and attitudes and he must be involved in an environment which in many ways is separated from the previous environment [the home / parents] in which he was developed. …many of these changes are produced by association with peers who have less authoritarian points of view, as well as through the impact of a great many courses of study in which the authoritarian pattern is in some ways brought into question while more rational and non-authoritarian behaviors are emphasized.” David Krathwohl, Benjamin Bloom, Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: Book II Affective Domain
They just keep saying it, we’re just not listening.
The “new set of attitudes and values” we find acknowledged previously in Book 1 of the Taxonomies with this clear philosophical system as follows
We recognize the point of view that truth and knowledge are only relative and that there are no hard and fast truths which exist for all time and all places.” (Benjamin Bloom, Taxonomy of Educational Objectives Book 1: Cognitive Domain, pg. 32
Another words all is relative. That is the values and behaviours that they wish to instil.
Benjamin Bloom normally cites all sources yet in this instance does not cite the paraphrased source, and for good reason, since the source is Karl Marx who states
“In the eyes of the dialectical philosophy, nothing is established for all times, nothing is absolute or sacred.”
Marx himself also acquires such an idea from Georg Hegel himself who says
“What truly is always true is that all is in flux, the truth-seeker ought properly to address himself to the study of this life process of truth seeking itself.” Georg W. F. Hegel
So the values and beliefs of children are challenged, and changed to a belief there is “no truth” and “all is relative”. Good bye God, good bye Bible, good bye parents and in all fact good bye civilisation. (Enter the planned Global French Revolution.)
“Our culture, including all that we are taught in schools and universities, is so infused with patriarchal thinking that it must be torn up root and branch if genuine change is to occur. Everything must go – even the allegedly universal disciplines of logic, mathematics, and science, and the intellectual values of objectivity, clarity, and precision on which the former depend.”Daphne Patai and Noretta Koertge, Professing Feminism: Cautionary Tales from the Strange World of Women’s Studies
(New York, Basic Books, 1994), p. 116
Thus as we will see this is a movement from which they intend to unhinge every established door from every frame, even demolish the house of sanity to expose the future to the cruel elements of the open sky.
New values, new math, the new norm. Did you know feminism was concerned about establishing a new math, and new science, new English and comprehension. This basis is as said before, one based upon experience, better put as the development of intuition.
Eve’s religion of tree worship. A statement that will be ever so significant as you read on.
A significant flag was raised recently when my daughter was speaking to me about something that happened at school and begun by stating “It is true fact…”
This is George Orwell’s “1984” language being spoken by the next up and coming generation for in Orwell’s “1984” he uses the term “new speak” where the very terms “Real Fact” and “True Fact” are used. Orwell was a Fabian Socialist also.
Quoting from Orwell’s “1984” regarding the change of language we hear
“We’re getting the language into its final shape,” Syme answered. “By the year 2050 at the very latest not a single human being will be alive who could
understand the conversation we are having now.”
We are not just hearing of a plan of humanist change. That plan was put into action long ago. You and I are it’s fruits to which God is graciously correcting me to believe snow is white and is not black. God’s change is repentance.
Quoting Fabian Aneurin Bevan
“… progress is not the elimination of struggle but rather a change in its terms.”
If you change the language you can change the culture, because you change the way the people think.
In a speech to the Australian Fabians on their 100th Anniversary on 18th May 1984, former Australian Prime Minister, Bob Hawke made more than a few enlightening comments, which I encourage you to read for yourself in full.
Quoting the President of the British Labour Executive from 1923 Bob Hawke states
“Let me insist on what our opponents habitually ignore, and, indeed, what they seem intellectually incapable of understanding, namely the inevitable gradualness of our scheme of change. The very fact that Socialists have both principles and a programme appears to confuse nearly all their critics” “Earlier I dealt at some length with the principle of the inevitability of gradualness. There was another important idea – a method more than a principle – which became closely associated with Fabianism. Sidney Webb called it “permeation”. Today it would be called “consensus“.
Theodor Adorno hit upon the same plan many decades before writing
“b. RESISTANCE TO SOCIAL CHANGE. Another aspect of traditionalism is the tendency to oppose innovations or alterations of existing politic-economic forms. ‘The best ways to solve social problems is to stick close to the middle of the road, to move slowly and to avoid extremes.’” Theodor Adorno The Authoritarian Personality
We see the same language used by “America’s Pastor” Rick Warren who stated before the 46th Annual Islamic Society of North America (ISNA) Convention,
“… we try to walk down this pathway together, in the middle, not on the extremes. You know what I discovered, if you walk down the middle of the road, you get hit coming and going .You get hit on both sides… you actually try to build relationships…” Remarks as Delivered at the 46th Annual ISNA Convention, By Pastor Rick Warren, Saddleback Church, Washington , DC, July 4, 2009, http://blog.beliefnet.com/cityofbrass/2009/07/transcript—pastor-rick-warre.html
The key elements here in all these statements are “the middle road” and “gradually”.
This is vitally important. The middle road is termed better if we called it “synthesis” thus either “extreme” is either the thesis and the antithesis.
Thus the process of change requires not solution but rather chaos, crisis, difficulty, obstacle, dilemma etc. This produces the need to build relationships to work together socially to resolve “the crisis” until the next crisis. It is a slow, process taking numerous generations and will in effect never reach a conclusion for all is in FLUX.
“For the right moment you must wait, as Fabius did, most patiently, when warring against Hannibal, though many censured his delays; but when the time comes you must strike hard, as Fabius did, or your waiting will be in vain and fruitless.”
This is the reason the Fabians changed their logo from a wolf in sheep’s clothing to a tortoise, because a tortoise is slow but when it strikes, it strikes hard.
Former Labor Party leader Kim Beasley expressed the same sentiments stating in “The Australian” 28th August 1997,
“I believe these things are done incrementally. You prepare a public mind, a public attitude; you create an acceptance of the unacceptable…”
I thought an elected representative was employed to represent the WILL of the PEOPLE who elected them, not alter their will “incrementally”.
This though comes down to a distinct hatred for God and any system that has been formed under the auspices of God (especially Jesus Christ and the Bible), our legal system, the constitution, Western Culture, etc.
So we see the very obsession of the psych industry regarding children comes from an religious propensity to undo the very act of the Garden of Eden. Not by my own interpretation but by their own admission. They war against the God who brought the commandment to noteat the fruit of the tree. Only one tree mind you.
Have a listen to the same spirit speaking from the next 3 personalities.
Emerging Church leader Alan Jones speaks like a true dialectician
“The Church’s fixation on the death of Jesus as the universal saving act must end, and the place of the cross must be re imagined in Christian faith. Why? Because of the cult of suffering and the vindictive God behind it.” “”The other thread of just criticism addresses the suggestion implicit in the cross that Jesus’ sacrifice was to appease an angry god. Penal substitution [the Cross] was the name of this vile doctrine.” pg 132 and pg 168 Reimagining Christianity by Alan Jones, endorsed by Brian McLaren.
Re-imagining is no different to re-education, re-orientation, re-training.
This man is no Christian but rather is a Luciferic Gnostic occultist wolf who feels he can shed his sheep’s clothing. The church has always been riddled with them.
Like Alan Jones’ statement, Erick Fromm declares the hero in the story of man, as the serpent stating
“In the process of history man gives birth to himself. He becomes what he potentially is [human potential – 3rd force psychology], and he attains what the serpent―the symbol of wisdom and rebellion―promised, and what the patriarchal, jealous God of Adam did not wish: that man would become like God himself.” You Shall be as gods by Erick Fromm.
Considering Erick Fromm is one of the two who framed Benjamin Bloom’s Taxonomies “Weltanschaaung” one should be asking why is there a religious and spiritual element coming through over and over again in what supposed to be merely “higher order” thinking skills? (You would be excused for thinking they don’t have a word game being played here either. If you have read my other blogs, some of them discuss the occult principle “As Above So Below, So Below As Above”. It it very apparent here that what they call Higher Order thinking Skills is actually from the infernal regions below, so to speak.)
Erick Fromm’s words sound distinctly like Occultist H P Blavatsky in her book “The Secret Doctrine Volume 1”
“The goddess was the personified symbol of the various and successive aspects represented by the moon in each of her three phases; and this interpretation was already that of the Stoics (Cornut. De Nat, D. 34, 1), while the Orpheans explained the epithet by the three kingdoms of nature over which she reigned. jealous, bloodthirsty, revengeful and exacting, Hecate-Luna is a worthy counterpart of the “Jealous God” of the Hebrew prophets.” pg 395 The Secret Doctrine Vol 1 by H P Blavatsky
One would think he may have had some connection or association or had at least been influenced by her works. Many well known individuals have influences that derive from this woman including Thomas Edison, Albert Einstein, and Elvis Presley who died on the toilet with her book “Sound of Scilence” on the floor next to him. The list could go on.
It is quite apt that Blavatsky would write about the Orpheans since Sigmund Freud based his fundamental tenets of his psychology on the story of Orpheus. (Orpheus was a homosexual who had physical relations with young boys.)
Just to make it clear who the hero is to these guys I quote from Saul Alinsky
“Lest we forget at least an over-the-shoulder acknowledgment to the very first radical … The first Radical known to man who rebelled against the establishment and did it so effectively that he at least won his own kingdom — Lucifer.” -Saul Alinsky
Yet Erick Fromm is not alone in the warfare on God and the whole Garden affair.
We hear the same from Norman O Brown
“To experience Freud is to partake a second time of the forbidden fruit;”
Life Against Death: The Psychoanalytical Meaning of History by Norman O Brown.
“Freud did not abandon the illusion that Adam really fell.
We on the other hand cling to the position that Adam never really fell.”
Brown, Norman O. LIFE AGAINST DEATH. Middletown Connecticut: Wesleyan University Press, 1959 p. 270
Equally we hear this from Herbert Marcuse
“If the guilt accumulated in the civilized domination of man by man can ever be redeemed by freedom, then the ‘original sin’ must be committed again: ‘We must again eat from the tree of knowledge in order to fall back into the state of innocence.” Eros and Civilization: A philosophical inquiry into Freud by Herbert Marcuse.
I have wondered since first hearing this from Marcuse if what he is referring to unbeknowest to him is what Revelations called the “second death”, because the second fall is not just a fall from commandment but a fall from grace in Christ, total rejection of redemption by Gods only Son Jesus Christ.
John Dewey (Humanist and developer of the Dewey Decimal System) stated
“God’s work is a source of corruption in individuals.” (John Dewey, Democracy and Education)
The fathers of modern education have a distinct distaste for anything to do with God or conscience or parental authority, especially fathers.
Carl Rogers who worked with Dr William Colson at the Bethel-Maine National Training Labs where aware kids, and teachers were committing suicide after undergoing their experiments in J.L Moreno’s Role Plays. http://www.ntl.org/
Carl Rogers, also with a disdain for authority in a way that reads like a parody of John 1:1 and Genesis writes
“In the beginning I was one person, knowing nothing but my own experience. Then, I was told things and became two people… In the beginning was I, and I was good. Then came an other I. Outside authority.” pg 9 Person to person: The Problem of Being Human, A New trend in psychology, by Carl Rogers and Barry Stevens.
John 1:1 reads
“In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.”
“In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth.”
“… and God saw that it was good.”
There is clear animosity to the Bible and a distinct intent to keep referring to it whilst turning it upside down.
The key point that all the social psychologists gravitate towards is any form of undermining authority
“What we need to learn, it seems, are ways of gaining acceptance for a humanistic person-centered venture in a culture more devoted to rule by authority.” Freedom To Learn for the 80’s by Carl Rogers
Humanism is not a benign philosophy or belief system. It is just as religious as any religion, and possesses just as many extremists as any other religion.
Thus it is not surprising that the US Supreme Court stated that Humanism was a non theistic religion.
The United States Supreme Court 1961 case Torcaso Vs Watkins footnote 11 states
“Among religions in this country that do not teach what is generally believed to be a belief in the existence of God, are Buddhism, Taoism, Secular Humanism,…”
The father of roleplay J. L. Moreno is also another figure who has had great impact on where we are today.
Moreno is given a special mention in a document called “Human relations and curriculum change.” which came out of Bethel Maine labs and states
“The editors make special acknowledgment to Dr. J. L. Moreno, who has pioneered in the areas currently referred to as psychodrama, sociodrama,
role-playing, action dynamics, warming-up technique, group psychotherapy and sociometry, and who first introduced these terms into the literature,
with some of the meanings emphasized in the present volume. To a great extent, the basic impetus for certain new trends in group and action research can be traced to the work of Moreno and his numerous associates, to such books as The Theatre of Spontaneity (German edition, 1923), Who Shall Survive? (1934), Sociodrama (1943), and Psychodrama (1945), and to the journal Sociometry (1936-1951).” pg XI HUMAN RELATIONS IN CURRICULUM CHANGE by KENNETH D. BENNE and BOZIDAR MUNTYAN.
This tool of sociometry is about control of groups. Moreno states
“What gives every sociometrically defined group its momentum is the ‘criterion’, the common motive which draws individuals together spontaneously, for a certain end… Sociometrists have been particularly interested in groups which are built around strong criteria; formal and institutional groups were the first and most rewarding targets, home groups, work groups, school groups, cultural groups.”
You could also add to that in hindsight Church Groups and Youth Groups, Mens groups, Womens Group, etc. I seriously doubt we would have gone down this road as easily as we have without 2 critical factors.
1.Believers in Jesus Christ and Church Ministers put their bible reading habits aside (Personally, to each other, Family time, in the Church, now in society.)
2.Believers in Jesus Christ and Church Ministers took up the habit of TV (and associated media devices) and time wasting.
Humanist John Dewey understood the usefulness of changing habits as explained in a paper presented at American Education Research Association Conference, Denver, CO by Day, M., & Harbour, C. (2010, May)
“When society is populated by a species naturally inclined to habitual ways of thinking and acting it inevitably will be challenged by (a) changing social conditions (urbanization, new immigrants, increased mobility, increases in leisure time, etc.), (b) technological changes (telephone, automobile, airplane, etc.), (c) changes in work (e.g., growth of factories and the mass production of goods), (d) changes in amusements (e.g., movies and radio), and (e) an increased sophistication of opinion makers and abilities to manipulate public opinions.” John Dewey, Everett Dean Martin and the formative years of the American adult education movement http://michael-day.org/adult-education/dewey-martin-and-formative-years/
This idea of changing habits was interestingly hit upon in a expose published by Jesuit Noviate, Abatte Leone in his book “The Secret Plan of the Order” 1848, a book that was about the continuing Counter Reformation by one of their own, and who was horrified by what he overheard. He writes as he overhears a conference between top Jesuits,
“It is highly to us that we should seem to offer large guarantees to every class of society. To the aristocracy of Protestant lands we should thus address ourselves :- “The Roman hierarchy is able to gain you the victory; but this is on condition that she finds an echo in your own souls. It is by your efforts that the people must be collected into their former fold; when safely there, the impetuous torrent will no longer ravage your domains, you will see that submission will be restored, and the bad spirit which threatens to root up and destroy all things, shall itself be rooted up and destroyed. Your fathers turned everything upside down, the remedy must be not less energetic than the evil. Call upon all those over whom you have influence to listen, and address them boldly in some such words as these:- ‘Protestantism is an aberration. It has engendered nothing but miseries and innumerable catastrophes. It is a religion lopped of its members, it is not even a skeleton.’
`Catholicism alone presents a harmonious whole. Where there is no confession, no pope, no attractive form of worship to address itself to the senses, no rallying point, no all-powerful and ever acting control, all must needs be scattered like sand. We offer ourselves to your example, as the first to prostrate ourselves before the guides of our conscience, the first to reject the apostasy of our fathers! Let it be our common task to join together what has been rent. To the great work then! Aid us! follow us!
In this way the mass of the people, fascinated by your words and your example, will feel their souls stirred within them, their habits will be gradually changed, and at last with one impulse they will fall on their knees before our common mother.” pg 160
This last part is very prophetic being written in 1848, (consider what you only just read from the former Australian Prime Minister Bob Hawke) and obviously the plans put into place and enacted upon have brought much evil fruit. We now see almost the entire church and even the entire world hanging on the words of the Pope of Rome.
Rick Warren really showed his true colours on 3rd July 2006 in Sydney, Australia when he said in front of a crowd of more than 10,000
“Lenin said give me one hundred totally committed people and I’ll change the world, Jesus did it with eleven. It obviously worked, we’re all here. And when they walked into Jerusalem, they said they’ve turned the city and the world upside down. It’s time we turned it right side up, will you be that person, what’s it going to take? Well first we have to accept God’s agenda, and what is God’s agenda? Well it’s not yours. God’s agenda is the Kingdom of God. The Kingdom of God is Jesus’ favourite term for His plan in the world.” July 3rd 2006 from a Hillsong conference
See the below video to confirm his words loud and clear. There is no misinterpretation
That statement itself even comes from Acts 17:6
“And when they found them not, they drew Jason and certain brethren unto the rulers of the city, crying, These that have turned the world upside down are come hither also;”
If the disciples and believers in Christ turned the world upside down, what would it then mean to turn it right side up? It would be the same as Abbate Leone’s Jesuits who want to turn the current state of affairs in 1848 “upside down”.
Former President George W Bush’s comments on 22nd March 2001, show how far we have come stating
“The best way to honour John Paul II, truly one of the great men, is to take his teaching seriously; is to listen to his words and put his words and teachings into action here in America. This is a challenge we must accept.”
Give it only 80 years ago, much of the Protestant Church was still teaching the Pope is antichrist. It is interesting to note based upon what we have read what Pope Francis says,
“Here we see a first principle for progress in building a people: time is greater than space.
223. This principle enables us to work slowly but surely, without being obsessed with immediate results. It helps us patiently to endure difficult and adverse situations, or inevitable changes in our plans. It invites us to accept the tension between fullness and limitation, and to give a priority to time. One of the faults which we occasionally observe in sociopolitical activity is that spaces and power are preferred to time and processes. Giving priority to space means madly attempting to keep everything together in the present, trying to possess all the spaces of power and of self-assertion; it is to crystallize processes and presume to hold them back. Giving priority to time means being concerned about initiating processes rather than possessing spaces. Time governs spaces, illumines them and makes them links in a constantly expanding chain, with no possibility of return. What we need, then, is to give priority to actions which generate new processes in society and engage other persons and groups who can develop them to the point where they bear fruit in significant historical events. Without anxiety, but with clear convictions and tenacity.” APOSTOLIC EXHORTATION, EVANGELII GAUDIUM OF THE HOLY FATHER FRANCIS, TO THE BISHOPS, CLERGY, CONSECRATED PERSONS AND THE LAY FAITHFUL ON THE PROCLAMATION OF THE GOSPEL IN TODAY’S WORLD
Sounds like Bob Hawkes speech to the Australian Fabians, the social psychologists and even Neale Donald Walsch’s pragmatism “what works”. It’s all the same thing.
Pope Francis I clearly understands “the process” emphasising time and process over space and power. This then explains the introduction of evolutionary thought and the belief in an old earth 150 – 200 years ago, for it is through uniformitarianism that the idea of time and process becomes workable.
Little though, and without excuse, there is still one higher still than time and process, and that is the eternal and constant.
As the Words of Jesus and the Scriptures state in Mark 13:31 and Hebrews 5:9 respectively
“Heaven and earth shall pass away: but my words shall not pass away.”
“And being made perfect, he became the author of eternal salvation unto all them that obey him…”
What an amazing turn around. Habits have been changed. Prayer habits, Bible reading habits, study habits, converted to TV viewing habits, fun, excitement and entertainment habits, creature comfort habits, workaholic habits, making us “lovers of pleasure more than lovers of God”. (2 Timothy 3:4).
Reading habits are merely confined to novels and biographies and popular histories, comics etc. Educating children in habitualistic behaviours are part of our TV habits, computer games and internet habits (not for good purpose). Families spending most of their time not talking or involved in constructive development encouraging easy separation of children and parents from each other. This issue of habit forming is tantamount to victorious living in Christ and seeing the defeat of these enemies of the spirit, mind, soul and body or otherwise complete defeat body, mind, soul and spirit and not even knowing you are conquered and who you obey.
Yet the array of enemies encompass us even in our slumber, Vladimir Lenin said
“We must learn how to eradicate all bourgeois habits, customs and traditions everywhere.” Vladimir Lenin’s Left-Wing Communism: an Infantile Disorder An Essential Condition of the Bolsheviks’ Success May 12, 1920
Why are all these diverse people and institutions saying the same things?
At work we have a large “compulsory” multicultural recruitment policy. (You know, EQUALITY, where one person might be better qualified for the job but because racial, sex, sexual orientation quota’s must be fulfilled, the less qualified gets the job).
This has provided a great smorgasbord of different cultures, religions and nationalities to which one can discover clearly that many are lamenting the destruction of their own cultures back in their own countries, the respect of their children, and religious traditions in as many place as India, South East Asia, China, and Japan, and numerous other locations. Multiculturalism is not about everyone retaining their own culture but in the final analysis, no one possessing any culture. The Homogenisation of the Globe, into the One.
We are not alone in the attack on habits, customs, and tradition. It is global.
That is because Hegel said the process cannot be successful if even one person escapes.
No one must escape the process, else authority be brought back into the fray, and they organise and overthrow the heresiarchal tyranny (tyranny of children – adults with children’s minds.)
Edward Bernays (cousin of Sigmund Freud) nicknamed the father of public relations also paraded in his books the grand reality that people no longer made up their own minds but that it was made up for them, stating
“Public Relations embraces the engineering of consent based on Jefferson’s principle that in a truly democratic society everything depends on the consent of the public, this fundamental truth is the basis of my life’s work.”
In his book “Propaganda” written in 1928 prior to the official development of television and it’s wide spread release Edward Bernays makes this insightful revelation of
“Television, broadcasting, loud speakers… utilized as propaganda aids. Propaganda assists in marketing new inventions. Propaganda, by repeatedly interpreting new scientific ideas and inventions to the public, has made the public more receptive. Propaganda is accustoming the public to change and progress.” pg 80 Propaganda by Edward Bernays.
Bernays chequered life involved the manufacturing of wars in Central America at the behest of American Fruit Corporations and continues stating
“The conscious and intelligent manipulation of the organised habits and opinions of the masses is an important element in a democratic society, those who manipulate this unseen mechanism of society constitute an invisible government which is the true ruling power of our country. .. no serious sociologist any longer believes the voice of the people expresses any divine or specially wise or lofty ideas, the voice of the people expresses the mind of the people and that mind is made up for it by the group leaders in whom it believes and by those persons who understand the manipulation of public opinion. It is composed of the inherent prejudices and symbols and cliches and verbal formulas supplied to them by the leaders of the media, the government, those who are the movers and shakers of society. “
Note well that democratic society is being used as a road to socialism. The People!
The Democratic Republic of …. is always socialist, comprehend?
Clearly though if you are careful about hearing what all these people are saying, it is though there is some form of organising of ideas as Bernays states
“Propaganda will never die out. Intelligent men must realize that propaganda is the modern instrument by which they can fight for productive ends and help to bring order out of chaos.” pg 84 Propaganda by Edward Bernays.
Thus it is not surprising to hear J.L Moreno state in “Please Touch: A Guided Tour of the Human Potential Movement by Jane Howard”
“… we’re going through a transitional period  of anarchy and chaos. The giants are dead and 200 million midgets are in charge [U.S citizens, aka “democracy”). We have to wait for what we need: a psychiatry and sociatry for all mankind.”
Another words, the 200 million people in the US at that time as a “democracy”, were in charge until better controls were found in the disciplines of psychiatry and sociatry. As Bernays said “The mind of the people has to be made up for it by the group leaders.”
Another way this is done to extract rapid change is through fear mongering under a process called crisis management.
Interestingly the slogan of the Freemasons is “Ordo Ab Chao” Order out of chaos. Thus why facilitators of change are not about finding solutions to problems, but rather are trained to create and use problems to continue “perpetual change”, “perpetual revolution”.
So the cry will be like in Jeremiah 6:14-15
“They have healed also the hurt of the daughter of my people slightly, saying, Peace, peace; when there is no peace. Were they ashamed when they had committed abomination? nay, they were not at all ashamed, neither could they blush: therefore they shall fall among them that fall: at the time that I visit them they shall be cast down, saith the LORD.”
There can be no peace when nothing is certain and all is in flux. There can be no shame when you cannot understand the commandment. This is what is on the other side of the transition / chaos / confusion.
This is what the people and children of the world are learning, that to only hear the thoughts and feelings of their hearts and others in the group rather than the commandment of the fathers on earth and The Father in Heaven. Thus when you change the language to exclude right and wrong and authority, the people are incapable of repenting because they have done nothing wrong (in their own eyes), they cannot blush, they have no conscience. This is the New World Order.
This is just as we are told in Proverbs 30:12
“There is a generation that are pure in their own eyes, and yet is not washed from their filthiness.”
Jesus Christ washes us from all our filthiness, but this is why modern culture does not understand Jesus Christ at all because they do not see their own filthiness and thus is irrelevant.
Little did I understand for all those years why Churches and Christians kept calling for relevance in the Church. Relevance is ethereally defined as being contemporary or like something else (aka the world.)
We see that J.L Moreno calls for a New Order but as already stated only comes through anarchy and chaos in the same way the phoenix rises from the ashes.
“… the origins of my work go back to a primitive religion and my objectives were the setting up and promoting of a new cultural order.”
Adolf Hitler also called for a New World Order, George Bush Snr, Pope John Paul II, Pope Benedict and many others have become more blatant over the last decade.
Note well that Moreno lets the cat out of the bag in that the work goes back to “primitive religion”. How far back is a question well worth considering. As we have seen, it goes back to the garden.
A good question at this point is to ask where does sociometry come from, what are it’s roots? Moreno helps us answer that one.
“Revolutionary socialism gave to Sociometry the idea of planned social action… [just like Pope Francis says] Sociometry differs from revolutionary socialisms in that it must be experimentally devised and controlled, that it must be applied to small groups first and applied to larger groups [aka facebook] as the knowledge derived from small systems increased, as found in sociology.” J. L. Moreno.
So as we have read Moreno wanted and worked toward developing a Sociometry to use in groups, including school groups. Instead of using actual bullets they use words through dialogue to shoot down the “authority” in individuals lives by group pressure and ridicule. Thus they turned the pupils in the classroom into practising soviets.
It was said far back as 1920 that
“No school worthy of the name can exist unless the principle of respect for authority is observed. No school can exist without discipline, without subordination of pupils to reasonable rules and regulations. Anarchy in school means anarchy in the nation later on. . . .” “Has authority been banished in these later days? Is there still such a thing as discipline? Has the world reached a point where it will condone the formation of a pupil soviets?” Will C. Wood, Superintendent of Public Instruction of the State of California, California Blue Bulletin, 1920.
Moreno makes it very clear his views on overthrowing God and installing scientific socialism. In his book titled “Who Shall Survive: Foundations of Sociometry, Group Psychotherapy and Sociodrama” which he calls his “New Testament” he states the following
“As I tried the sociometric system first on the universe and on the concept of God, its first manifesto was a revolutionary religion, a change of the idea of the universe and the idea of God. The god of Jesus was further extended, the son ‘withered away’ until nothing was left except the universal creativity of the Godhead and only one commandment: To each according to what he is .”
“Our epoch will reach a climax with a scientific Christ ending the chain.”
“My God idea, out of which the idea of the sociometric system grew, was therefore ultimately the greatest barrier to my going to Russia, accepting the Soviet doctrine …. I preferred to be the midwife to an incoherent, confused, democratic way of life, than the commissar of a highly organized world. It is my God book which turned me to the United States.”
“Christianity can be looked at as the greatest and most ingenious psycho-therapeutic procedure man has ever invented compared with which medical psycho-therapy has been of practically negligible effect.”
“Parents have no right upon their offspring except a psychological right. Literally the children belong to universality.”
“I could well imagine a world of a reversed order, opposite to ours, in which ethical suicide of people after 30 or 35 as a religious technique or countering overpopulation is just as natural as birth control has become in our culture. In that society the love of life would be carried to its extreme. ‘Make space for the unborn, make space for the newborn, for everyone born, Every time a new baby is born make space for him by taking the life of an old man or an old woman.”
So much talk about God. This is not just about the content of what is taught at school any more, the issue is also, just like television, the method, the medium by what teaches the content, the super structure, curriculum.
Moreno’s statement “To each according to what he is.” is from the Socialist4 formula
“To each according to his contribution…”.
“From each according to his ability, to each according to his need.” Karl Marx in 1875 “Critique of the Gotha program”.
Remember J L Moreno stated that criterion “draws individuals together spontaneously, for a certain end.”
This is what “social action” is about. “Good works” engineered for the purpose of changing us into their likeness.
Makes sense of why we are told in Isaiah 64:6
“But we are all as an unclean thing, and all our righteousnesses are as filthy rags; and we all do fade as a leaf; and our iniquities, like the wind, have taken us away.”
Notice J. L. Moreno also stating “… a world of reversed order…” speaks just like the Jesuits in Leones book which said
“Your fathers turned everything upside down, the remedy must be not less energetic than the evil.”
This smacks distinctly as a counter reformation.
Dean Gotcher of www.authorityresearch.com sees it as opposition to “a system of righteousness” aka “thou shalt” and “thou shalt not” contrasted by Abraham Maslow’s “system of oughtiness” eg “I ought to be able to….” leading to self justification and thus self righteousness.
These are just a few examples to show how obsessed psychology, Marx, Engels and others were about overthrowing the authority of God and how religious this actually is.
Another example of the religious nature is in Irvin Yaloms words contrasted with John 3:3’s
“Jesus answered and said unto him, Verily, verily, I say unto thee, Except a man be born again, he cannot see the kingdom of God.”
Yalloms comparison is as follows:
“One of the most fascinating aspects of group therapy is that everyone is born again, born together in the group.” “Few individuals, as Asch has shown, can maintain their objectivity in the face of apparent group unanimity; …” Irvin D. Yalom Theory and Practice and Group Psychotherapy
Yallom’s “objectivity” is not maintaining their belief in parent and or God, yet we send our children trustingly and foolishly to under go what “few individuals” can resist. Subjected to group therapy in the classroom they capitulate the “rock of their foundation” and are reconciled to the world of sinking sand.
It then becomes obvious to note as stated before that the real focus is upon “the child” either the actual child in this world or bringing out the “inner child” in adults.
What is this “child” and person who has no rules but what we are ourselves. As George Hegel puts it
“… lawlessness which is law”
The Apostle Paul also explains the same which makes perfectly clear what we are talking about here is a spiritual war. The Apostle Paul writes in his letter to the Romans 2:12-15
“For as many as have sinned without law shall also perish without law: and as many as have sinned in the law shall be judged by the law; (For not the hearers of the law are just before God, but the doers of the law shall be justified. For when the Gentiles, which have not the law, do by nature the things contained in the law, these, having not the law, are a law unto themselves: Which shew the work of the law written in their hearts, their conscience also bearing witness, and their thoughts the mean while accusing or else excusing one another;)”
Hegel, Marx, Freud, and the social psychologists knew against what they were battling.
Since when the child who not having law does the things in the law it shows that conscience is infused within a human being at birth, only requiring cultivation. Just like the mind, requires training, thus it is natural. Denying the right for children to have right and wrong infused into their being is the same as denying the child from knowledge or denying the child’s limbs from learning to operate.
It is like an antenna of righteousness. So what these revilers of truth are doing is building on sinking sands, because when they think they have destroyed the voice of God, then it will shoot back out of the heart of the child when least expected.
Consider the two witnesses in Revelation 11:3-14
“And I will give power unto my two witnesses, and they shall prophesy a thousand two hundred and threescore days, clothed in sackcloth. 4 These are the two olive trees, and the two candlesticks standing before the God of the earth. 5 And if any man will hurt them, fire proceedeth out of their mouth, and devoureth their enemies: and if any man will hurt them, he must in this manner be killed. 6 These have power to shut heaven, that it rain not in the days of their prophecy: and have power over waters to turn them to blood, and to smite the earth with all plagues, as often as they will. 7 And when they shall have finished their testimony, the beast that ascendeth out of the bottomless pit shall make war against them, and shall overcome them, and kill them. 8 And their dead bodies shall lie in the street of the great city, which spiritually is called Sodom and Egypt, where also our Lord was crucified. 9 And they of the people and kindreds and tongues and nations shall see their dead bodies three days and an half, and shall not suffer their dead bodies to be put in graves. 10 And they that dwell upon the earth shall rejoice over them, and make merry, and shall send gifts one to another; because these two prophets tormented them that dwelt on the earth. 11 And after three days and an half the Spirit of life from God entered into them, and they stood upon their feet; and great fear fell upon them which saw them. 12 And they heard a great voice from heaven saying unto them, Come up hither. And they ascended up to heaven in a cloud; and their enemies beheld them. 13 And the same hour was there a great earthquake, and the tenth part of the city fell, and in the earthquake were slain of men seven thousand: and the remnant were affrighted, and gave glory to the God of heaven. 14 The second woe is past; and, behold, the third woe cometh quickly.”
It is seriously of great import that Reformation Eschatology considers vs13 in reference to the French Revolution (socialism, the killing of the father, guillotine, and the three frogs of Revelations 16:13-14). Sir Issac Newton predicted the French Revolution 100 years prior to it’s occurrence through examining the scriptures.5
(This in no way implies the interpretation of this passage is about children who have no conscience, it is merely an example that when man tends to think he has the upper hand he looses it. Pride cometh before a fall.)
It is most interesting what Hegel wrote regarding the child
“The child, contrary to appearance, is the absolute, the rationality of the relationship; he is what is enduring and everlasting, the totality which produces itself once again as such.” (George Hegel, System of Ethical Life)
Thus the desire is to bring out the inner law of man (chaos), the desires of the heart, the lusts of the flesh, lusts of the eyes and the pride of life the law of chaos.
1 John 2:16
“For all that is in the world, the lust of the flesh, and the lust of the eyes, and the pride of life, is not of the Father, but is of the world.”
This is all that Eve saw in the tree of the knowledge of Good and evil in Genesis 3:6 was that
“… the tree was good for food, and that it was pleasant to the eyes, and a tree to be desired to make one wise, she took of the fruit thereof, and did eat, and gave also unto her husband with her; and he did eat.”
Understand God was not against pleasant things for in Genesis 2:9 we are told
“And out of the ground made the LORD God to grow every tree that is pleasant to the sight, and good for food; the tree of life also in the midst of the garden, and the tree of knowledge of good and evil.”
Notice that 2 of the 3 issues are covered by ALL the TREES being pleasant to sight and good for food. The only thing the denied tree had that is different was “knowledge of good and evil”.
Notice the requirement has not changed Luke 9:23-24
“And he said to them all, If any man will come after me, let him deny himself, and take up his cross daily, and follow me. For whosoever will save his life shall lose it: but whosoever will lose his life for my sake, the same shall save it.”
It is possible that this tree was not to be denied forever just as things denied your children today are only denied to the right age or maturity or the right time, though there are some things that are clearly off limits in life for all time and all places, thus it is also possible that this may have been a perpetually denied tree.
The nature of man is to lack the patience, and endurance in anticipation of God’s moving and action and jumping the gun. Thus with early prophecy regarding the coming of a redeemer from mans fall, mankind developed pagan substitutes based upon their limited understanding of the coming redeemer, thus any similarities to the actual redeemer Jesus Christ and pagan man made deities are pre-emptive, which show to us the seriousness of second guessing God and “helping” Him out.
This is why the social engineers want your children, they want to get them as early as possible to indoctrinate them into obeying their own thoughts(opinions) and feelings(heart desperately wicked Jeremiah 17:9) and convert them to a “New” Religion (an old religion as J. L. Moreno made clear). Since once they have been changed to a dialectical mindset of “Thinking” and “Feeling” they will be incapable of understanding the “commandments” of God or of Parents, like one radio tuned to Channel 6 and the broadcaster broadcasting on Channel 8, not only is the issue of not understanding, they don’t even hear you. (Dwell on that point for some time.)
Let’s consider more from Benjamin Bloom’s Taxonomies which has schooled generations of children since the 1950’s and discover great insight for the causes of the Generation Gap.
“The affective domain [feelings domain] is, in retrospect, a virtual ‘Pandora’s Box.’ It is in this ‘box’ that the most influential controls are to be found. The affective domain contains the forces that determine the nature of an individual’s life and ultimately the life of an entire people.” David Krathwohl, Benjamin Bloom, et al., Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: Book 2, Affective Domain pg 91
Notice it is about finding the controls. What Bloom is speaking of here is the mythology of Pandora’s box. That it is a gift you are not allowed to open and once opened cannot be closed again and once opened only evil comes out of it. (This sounds like the Garden in Genesis again)
Bloom is speaking of the heart of the child (this includes adults “in touch with their inner child”) as this self same “pandora’s box” because as we have seen they understand the Bible and are involved in active warfare against the Bible and the God of the Bible and the people of the Bible and any person who applies and holds to any Biblical principles (which they classify as a mental illness). Thus their primary target is Western culture where even atheists and humanists have “Christian” values and principles.
John Dewey also seeks “control” stating
“It is not the will or desire of any one person which establish order but the moving spirit of the whole group. Control is social.” (John Dewey, Experience and Education)
They clearly understand Jeremiah 17:9 which states about the heart of man
“The heart is deceitful above all things, and desperately wicked: who can know it?”
It is this “affective [heart] domain” that is this self same Pandora’s Box.
Carl Rogers in his “On becoming a person: A Therapist View of Psychotherapy” writes
“In psychology Freud and his followers presented convincing arguments that the id of mans basic and unconscious natures primarily made up of instincts, if permitted would result in incest, murder and crimes.”
They clearly understand what is being proposed here but there is good reason why they want our children.
This sounds distinctly similar to one of Karl Marx’s partners (a Russian anarchist) Mikhail Bakunin in the First International who states
“In this revolution we will have to awaken the Devil in the people, stir up the basest passions. Our mission is to destroy, not edify. The passion of destruction is a creative passion.”
This what is meant by Hegel when he says “Lawfulness without law.”
This is called Law of the flesh, Human nature. Law of sin.
Consider Romans 7:8-9
“But sin, taking occasion by the commandment, wrought in me all manner of concupiscence. For without the law sin was dead. For I was alive without the law once: but when the commandment came, sin revived, and I died.”
Without the law we obey the base desires of human nature but without guilt. Yet without guilt and conviction there is no need of a saviour. No need of a saviour then I’m OK and Your OK, to turn a phrase from a self help book. Thus the claim is one of self righteousness, and self perfection since there is no higher being that oneself.
This may seem workable for as long as one lives but if the theory is wrong, there is a vast sea of souls plummeting into Warren Bennis’ eternally burning “experiential chasm”.
One which Carl Rogers, if he could speak, would tell us of having said
“Experience is, for me, the highest authority.” “Neither the Bible nor the prophets, neither the revelations of God can take precedence over my own direct experience.” One Becoming a Person by Carl Rogers
So when we hear about education focusing on “creativity” think not they are speaking of the same thing that is in your mind? In fact it is quite diabolical.
This is the same spirit and words of Theosophist H.P Blavatsky who wrote
“To live is to die and to die is to live,” has been too little understood in the West. Siva, the destroyer, is the creator and the Saviour of Spiritual man, as he is the good gardener of nature. He weeds out the plants, human and cosmic, and kills the passions of the physical, to call to life the perceptions of the spiritual, man.” The Secret Doctrine Volume 1 pg 459 by Madam H P Blavatsky.
Writing in 1962 Alice Bailey speaks in Esoteric Psychology Volume 1 about this destroyer
“The will of Deity coloured the stream of energy units which we call by the name of the Ray of Will or Power, the first ray, and the impact of that stream on the
matter of space insured that the hidden purpose of Deity would inevitably and eventually be revealed. It is a ray of such dynamic intensity that we call it the ray of the Destroyer. It is not as yet functioning actively. It will come into full play only when the time comes for the purpose1 to be safely revealed.” pg 27
The First Ray is called by Alice Bailey
“the ray of the destroyer” pg 27 Esoteric Psychology Volume 1,
which she explains is
“the work of antichrist” pg 44 Esoteric Psychology Volume 1.
Now Antichrist to Alice Bailey and Occultists is not a bad thing. They consider it is merely the flip side of building. Like Yin and Yang not good and evil.6
We find this self same message of the destroyer, coming through in my blog on “The Meaning of Sticking out the Tongue”.
Reading again from Alice Bailey.
“The work of the Antichrist is to destroy forms, and this is essentially the work of the first expression of divinity. But the work of the destroyer is not the work of black magic, and when ignorant humanity regards Antichrist as working on the black side, their error is great. His work is as beneficent as that of the building aspect, and it is but man’s hatred of the death of forms which makes him regard the work of the destroyer as “black,” as being against the divine will, and as subversive of the divine programme.” pg 44 Esoteric Psychology Volume 1 by Alice Bailey
“Destroy forms” is another way of saying to kill the body, the external and J. L. Moreno has no problem with this. The guy whose work was mentioned in “Human Relations and Curriculum Change”.
Considering Carl Rogers further on this subject and remembering what he said regarding incest, murder and crime,
“The whole problem with therapy is seen by this group (also including Carl Rogers) on how to hold these untamed forces in check in a wholesome and constructive manner rather than the costly fashion of the neurotic”
There’s that Neurotic again. Those who have an authoritarian voice inside them, the conscience (Thou shalt, thou shalt not).
What is most curious is how can incest, murder and crime be kept in check in a “wholesome manner”. Those things are not wholesome full stop. You cannot keep them anywhere.
There is a clear cut reason why they want to rid conscience. Conscience holds you back from change or innovation (another word used to disguise “change”)
Seeking out new innovations in education and population control through “democracies” (the group) we find Kenneth Benne who recognised John Dewey’s input in “democratising modern life” in “Adult Education Bulletin” in 1948. Benne in the work “Human Relations in Curriculum Change” (a Marxist work) states that
“How can we be sure, then, that the democratic values which the school serves will be recognized and honored in the functioning of the group process [again go back and see Pope Francis’ “Evangelii Gaudium] and the changes which it produces? This question points to a third dimension of the necessary discipline for educators and others in the role of change
agents. What they must have is a method of social engineering whose operating procedures incorporate both democratic ideas and values and
the knowledge and skills relevant to initiating and controlling the change process. Part IV of the book identifies five basic democratic norms and translates them into operational elements of a social engineering methodology.“ (Kenneth Benne, Human Relations in Curriculum Change)
The five basic democratic norms as described by Kenneth Benne are,
“Democratic Norm 1. The engineering of change and the meeting of pressures on a group or organization toward change must be collaborative.
Democratic Norm 2. The engineering of change must be educational for the participants.
Democratic Norm 3. The engineering of change must be experimental.
Democratic Norm 4. The engineering of change must be task-oriented, that is, controlled by the requirements of the problem confronted and its effective solution, rather than oriented to the maintenance or extension of the prestige or power of those who originate contributions.
Democratic Norm 5. The engineering of change must be anti-individualistic, yet provide for the establishment of appropriate areas of privacy and for the development of persons as creative units of influence in our society.”
Notice how Norm 1 is about pressures, as it has been said “change can happen without conflict” If the facilitator of the meeting knows there is an antagonism between one person and another, they can and will utilise that in the room to cause discomfort for everyone and reinforce the method of solution through dialogue and compromise, but it can occur without this.
Norm 2 helps us understand why the Government keeps coming up with slogans for the country like “education nation” and so on, why they keep pushing reforms and increased funding like in the Gronski proposal here in Australia. How much will it cost to make children believe snow is black? It isn’t cheap, but real learning is.
Norm 3 shows us that the whole process of change takes place on the fly and everyone is participating in a grand, live experiment including our children in the school system.
Norm 4 shows us that the basis of change is pragmatism not morality, ethics (contrary to claims). It assumes falsely that there is a solution to every problem, rather than just allow sleeping dogs lie, they get them to fight till they abandon or change their beliefs. Again this is a process we are all expected to participate in if you have not noticed by the word “Democratic”. Democracy is the abandonment of all beliefs except for one dominant universal belief.
Norm 5 shows that they are socialist. In their own words “anti-individualistic”. It also shows us they are double tongued in claiming “privacy” (as Governments keeps harping on about yet rarely demonstrate) knowing that in the very words we have already read of Theodor Adorno whose work greatly influenced Bloom “To gain access [to privacy] is particularly important”
It was “Human relations in Curriculum Change” that was reworked to become the two Books by Bloom et al “Taxonomy on Educational Objectives”.
These statements are the acknowledgement for the need for a Taxonomy like manual to show teachers how to perform the process without knowing the whys and wherefores, thus maintaining a barrier between doing the process and understanding the process to avoid potential leaks, resistance and warning of the public.
Many people have asked me over the years how is it that so many people can be involved in so large a conspiracy (not just in education but all matters of life?
They use this as an argument against there being one, but as you have seen thus far, it is not that difficult to “educate” the masses to perform “tasks”, and yet never comprehend what you are doing.
Recently in Australia the federal Government has plans to run education in partnership with corporations to have
“… children educated to work specifically for those companies or others in the same field.” Financial Review, 12 June 2014. http://www.afr.com/p/national/education/tony_abbott_backs_us_style_corporate_esnG60ZXK0h8BtMr2Ip2TO
This is pure socialism where education is only geared towards employment and no other purpose.
That there is an example of the criterion. The only purpose for education in that setting would be to perform the functions and tasks of ones employment nothing more. Thus the individual will be easily dumbed down whilst appearing “competent” and in gainful employment.
That is another avenue to achieve the outcomes desired by these powerful wicked elites.
Remember Karl Marx saw clearly the road to procure this change stating
“Concerning the changing of circumstances by men, the educator must himself be educated.” (Karl Marx, Thesis on Feuerbach: # 3)
Thus by educating the teacher or educator in a new innovative form of education whose ideology is occluded by the “scientific” language of social psychology, those educators or teachers would then be able to pass on that same system to the entire next generation, and in turn procure change gradually even without their knowing that they were involved in anything but “education” a supposed knowledge industry yet an actual psychotherapy industry.
“Liberating education consists in acts of cognition, not transferals of information.” pg 67 Pedagogy of the Oppressed by Paulo Freire.
Ever wonder why kids can’t spell, read, do maths, have to have their parents do their homework. Wonder no longer.
Again numerous “wise” persons use the imperceptibility of any social change taking place as a convenient excuse to deny this very fact. (My kid can’t read, but that’s ok that’s normal.)
This key underestimation of the situation by many is a matter well understood by those privy to this scientific understanding as follows
“During the period of innovation, an environment is invisible. The present is always invisible because the whole field of attention is so saturated with it. It becomes visible only when it has been superseded by a new environment.” pg 237 US Federal Education Grant December 1969 Behaviour science in teacher education program.
An earlier influence upon the change in education came from the founder of experimental psychology
“To [Wilhelm] Wundt, a thing made sense and was worth pursuing if it could be measured, quantified, and scientifically demonstrated. Seeing no way to do this with the human soul, he proposed that psychology concern itself solely with experience. As Wundt put it… Karl Marx injected Hegel’s theories with economics and sociology, developing a “philosophy of dialectical materialism.”… From Wundt’s work it was only a short step to the later redefinition of education… To the experimental psychologist, however, education became the process of exposing the student to “meaningful” experiences so as to ensure desired reactions.” pg 8 The Leipzig Connection: The Systematic Destruction of American Education by Paolo Lionni and Lance J. Klass
So Wundt ditched the idea of soul, making humans mere material. It is no wonder then that the definition of education was changed from
“The drawing out of a person’s innate talents and abilities by imparting the knowledge of languages, scientific reasoning, history, literature, rhetoric, etc.—the channels through which those abilities would flourish and serve.” The New Century Dictionary of the English Language (Appleton, Century, Crofts: New York, 1927) from “The Deliberate Dumbing Down of America by Charlotte Thomson Iserbyt pg 1.
to a more technical and intellectualised language to confuse most people such as
“… learning is the result of modifiability in the paths of neural conduction. Explanations of even such forms of learning as abstraction and generalization demand of the neurones only growth, excitability, conductivity, and modifiability. The mind is the connection-system of man; and learning is the process of connecting.6 The situation-response formula is adequate to cover learning of
any sort, and the really influential factors in learning are readiness of the neurones, sequence in time, belongingness, and satisfying consequences [notice Pavlov there].” An Outline of Educational Psychology (Barnes & Noble: New York, 1934, rev. ed.) by Rudolph Pintner from “The Deliberate Dumbing Down of America by Charlotte Thomson Iserbyt pg 1.
Thus it was simplified in the US National Institute of Mental Health
“Education does not mean teaching people to know what they do not know – it means teaching them to behave as they do not behave.”
National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) sponsored report: The Role of Schools in Mental Health
But here’s why they want you to “change” aka loose your conscience, and in continuing in Rogers we hear that very reason as he quotes B. F. Skinner.
“We can achieve a sort of control although the controlled are following a code much more scrupulously [burdensome laws and regulations] than was the case in the old system [conscience] never the less feel free [passions can run rife]… That is the tremendous power of reinforcement. There is no restraint, but by careful design we control, not the final behaviour, but the motives, desires and the wishes. The curious thing in that case is the question of freedom never arises.”
We can see now more clearly that the game played at the beginning by Lucifer / Satan in the garden was one of control. Control through sin. Somehow Satan knew that through addiction to the flesh man would come under his rule and sway and thus would be predictable and thus he too could prophecy regarding our behaviour, in a way and be like God knowing the beginning from the end.
As Rogers again states
“We can choose to use our growing knowledge to enslave people in ways never dreamed of before, depersonalise them [human resources], control them by means so carefully selected they may perhaps never be aware of their loss of personhood” [That there is such a huge issue, which I will look at at some time regarding the definitions in law so what you mean is not what they mean.]
My note in brackets.
Winner of numerous Teacher of the Year Awards and such, John Gatto issues a well overdue warning
“As schooling encroaches further and further into family and personal life, monopolizing the development of mind and character, children become human resources at the disposal of whatever form of governance is dominant at the moment. That confers a huge advantage on the leadership of the moment, allowing it to successfully reproduce itself, foreclosing the strength of its competitors.” pg 407 The Underground History of American Education by John Gatto
We are at war, a silent war, and the target are unknowing children (and parents) in the classrooms, in front of TV’s, and Electronic devices, comics and books. The pressure is only going to keep increasing as workplaces, Educational institutions, places of Religion and Government, who structure and enforce these ideals for change. (The involvement of the Frankfurt School on Hollywood and Music and technology is quite amazing when you look into it, though these alone are not the only ones involved in this grand scheme.)
Consider the Rockerfeller Education Board who wrote in 1903 in the US and through the Carnigie Foundation has funded the development of the Australian Curriculum
“In our dreams…people yield themselves with perfect docility to our molding hands. The present educational conventions [intellectual and character education] fade from our minds, and unhampered by tradition we work our own good will upon a grateful and responsive folk. We shall not try to make these people or any of their children into philosophers or men of learning or men of science. We have not to raise up from among them authors, educators, poets or men of letters. We shall not search for embryo great artists, painters, musicians, nor lawyers, doctors, preachers, politicians, statesmen, of whom we have ample supply. The task we set before ourselves is very simple…we will organize children…and teach them to do in a perfect way the things their fathers and mothers are doing in an imperfect way.” Occasional Letter No.1, The General Education Board, 1903, organized by J.D. Rockefeller, with Fred T. Gates, and Andrew Carnegie as a trustee. Letter written by Fred T. Gates
A most curious thing that an Education Board wants to “organise children” in their own words “to do”. This is very critical language. This is the same as Pope Francis I calling for “action” and this is about organising children for social action.
What we do now in our own lives determines which side we will fall on when the crunch comes. Will we capitulate and surrender Christ, His Word and our freedom, or will we find ourselves outcasts of the whole system, whatever that might entail, for it is rapidly coming to that.
What this letter from Fred T Gates proposes in 1903 is precisely what the article from the Financial Review, 12 June 2014 speaks about regarding the Federal Government plan for education “partnership” (aka private public, Government Corporate education.)
Bloom continues to be explicit in his objectives in education stating
“What we call good teaching is a teachers ability to attain affective [feeling / emotional] objectives through challenging her students fixed beliefs.” pg 54 Taxonomy of Educational Objectives Book 2 Effective Domain 1964
Is that the role of a teacher, to challenge the beliefs parents have instilled in their children, (or at the very least are still in the process of instilling)?
It does appear that as we move closer to a completely debauched, relativistic society that the difference between parents and children are closing in some respects. That is because the values of the parents have been shifted so far away from listening to Authority to listening to their own heart (feelings), that both Parent and Child are educated in the same ignoble milieu. (There are statistical results that are claiming the opposite, ie: that the gap is widening. This discrepancy is easily explained in that the narrowing is the fact that both parents and children have children’s minds (immature aka inability to deny self) though the “parent” has seen the consequences of some decisions (only on another immature level that pleasure now may impinge on future pleasure because of disease or interpersonal conflict for example) so impose minimal restrictions yet do so ever so pathetically and weakly. Yet the gap is actually increasing due to technology which is a means for more rapid indoctrination and desensitization and thus intensified rebellion, disrespect and more so dismissal of the parent as irrelevant. The well indoctrinated “parent” (with a child’s mind) struggles with great difficulty saying no to it all.
This is very dangerous because it means we have moved passed the tipping point. That morality, ethics, goodness and godliness is rapidly on the decline and almost demonised and mocked at, bordering upon criminal.
Like Christian and Faithful in John Bunyan’s Pilgrims Progress who come to the city of Vanity.
Many people have said in times passed that things were on the up and up. Many in the church in the late 1800’s were expecting Jesus to come back at any moment and even some felt that Jesus would only come back when the Church had established the Kingdom on earth.
Well what they saw and experienced was a pivot point.
Like a plank on a pivot namely a seesaw. As Christians and moral people sat on the godly side of the seesaw and the wicked and careless began weighing down their side with evils like, 19th Century spiritism and occultism, the blood sacrifices of World War 1 and 2
(killing the fathers who could not pass on their old world values and traditions to their children8), we see the wicked side of the seesaw weighed down as the godly side rose up
(incurring the perception of the ascension of righteousness), till eventually now the gradient is now shifting at first gradually, now rapidly, that which was godly, yet not sure and made fastened and rooted, slides into the camp of wickedness and now finds itself there.
But we can only expect a few more to fall before they start to shake the plank, and bang it to loosen that which is slightly attached if not even cut one half of it loose.
(It is our unenviable job to heave against gravity, the nature of man, sin, desires of the flesh, and worst of all, guiltlessness that the process of mass psychotherapy creates, to entice others to reach out and get pulled back into the camp of righteousness. God Help Us.)
Then comes the forcible removal of any left.
It is the many elites in our world system that has endeavoured to specifically ensure there is division and no family love thus the closeness of family cannot trap any there from falling.
And he shall go before him in the spirit and power of Elias, to turn the hearts of the fathers to the children, and the disobedient to the wisdom of the just; to make ready a people prepared for the Lord.
This was the situation at the beginning of the 1st Century, and looking at the Pharisees we can understand why they were amazed that Jesus spoke with authority, everyone else debated opinions.
As a common saying goes “two Jews three opinions”.
Romans 1:21-32 21
Because that, when they knew God, they glorified him not as God, neither were thankful; but became vain in their imaginations, and their foolish heart was darkened. 22 Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools, 23 And changed the glory of the uncorruptible God into an image made like to corruptible man, and to birds, and fourfooted beasts, and creeping things. 24 Wherefore God also gave them up to uncleanness through the lusts of their own hearts, to dishonour their own bodies between themselves: 25 Who changed the truth of God into a lie, and worshipped and served the creature more than the Creator, who is blessed for ever. Amen. 26 For this cause God gave them up unto vile affections: for even their women did change the natural use into that which is against nature: 27 And likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust one toward another; men with men working that which is unseemly, and receiving in themselves that recompence of their error which was meet. 28 And even as they did not like to retain God in their knowledge, God gave them over to a reprobate mind, to do those things which are not convenient; 29 Being filled with all unrighteousness, fornication, wickedness, covetousness, maliciousness; full of envy, murder, debate, deceit, malignity; whisperers, 30 Backbiters, haters of God, despiteful, proud, boasters, inventors of evil things, disobedient to parents, 31 Without understanding, covenantbreakers, without natural affection, implacable, unmerciful: 32 Who knowing the judgment of God, that they which commit such things are worthy of death, not only do the same, but have pleasure in them that do them.
The Greek a;storgoj astorgos “without natural affection” means without familial love. Lacking love of family.
Karl Marx knew God. He wrote many things about his love for God in his younger years when he studied Theology. He wrote a book called “The union of the Faithful with Christ” in which he says
“Through the love of Christ we turn our hearts at the same time toward our brethren who are inwardly bound to us and for whom He gave Himself in sacrifice… Union with Christ could give an inner elevation, comfort in sorrow, calm trust, and a heart susceptible to human love, to everything noble and great, not for the sake of ambition and glory, but only for the sake of Christ”
He also wrote in a thesis of his called “Considerations of a Young man on Choosing His Career” where he says
“Religion itself teaches us that the ideal toward which all strive sacrificed Himself for humanity, and who shall dare contradict such claims? if we have chosen the position in which we can accomplish the most for Him, then we can never be crushed by burdens, because they are only sacrifices made for the sake of all.”
In the last quote of Marx we can see maybe a hint of what was to become his Social Economic Theory in the line “… for the sake of all.”
How he lost his faith, or if he really had any is a question that cannot be answered. Was this just a pretence to become a false leader in the church and was given a new mission by his handlers (if he had any at that time). None the less at the very least he became “vain in his imaginations” and his “foolish heart was darkened” deciding to uncover how Satan deceived in the garden.
As we read Romans 1 we see that everything that is becoming acceptable in our society is what the scripture speaks about.
What is most saddening is that “without natural affection” meaning in the Greek, without family love. The Fathers hearts are not towards their children, and the children are “disobedient to parents”.
Is this not what is “unnatural”. It is not natural for there to be a “generation gap”. It is an artificial construct we have blindly accepted and unwisely allowed “fools” lacking “understanding” to educate and entertain our children and our parents have allowed the same for us.
The prime example of it’s artificiality is where you find parents who are “into” movies or music. It is in these situations that the generation gap can evaporates. It evaporates even further when the parents hold the values that the movies and music teaches.
It is in such settings that we can see what the Generation Gap is.
In effect the parents are children in their minds and hearts just as much as their own actual children. In fact some children may have a clearer understanding of what is acceptable and not acceptable than even their parents in some instances.
I am sure you can recall examples through life where you have seen this is the case.
Yet what even these “hip”, “cool”, “friends” of their kids don’t realise is that even they are being undermined by the education system.
One example is “Values Clarification” as implemented in the Australian Education Systems curriculum.
“Under the ‘Values Clarification’ method, the dynamics of the situation exerts immense pressure on the child to abandon previous values, wherever derived, and replace them with new ones. The system coaxes the child to lay bare his heart, mind and soul before his teacher and peers. In the discussion that follows, his personal convictions and feelings are subject to comment and ridicule. If he is challenged, he must defend his values and the way he arrived at them. If his choice of value can be traced to parents, church, or any other source, it is automatically disqualified under the ‘rules of the game’, which say the only valid values are self chosen. This exposes the child who has been taught obedience and respect for parents to a cruel brand of intimidation. Skillful Humanist teachers can manipulate discussions so as to make peer pressure so intense that a few children are strong enough to adhere to their parent-taught values at all. Those who do can hardly escape feelings of shame and ostracism.” pg 46 The Disaster Road by Jean M Wallis quoting Attack on the Family by James Robinson.
Such an attack on Values is clearly on the agenda as this is a key issue as we can see from the New Religion proponents of the New Age.
Remember some of these statements and a few new ones,
“The first step for us as a society as we evolve is to abandon our values. The people who have their feet in the mud, who are ‘stuck’, are railing against this. They say that we are building a society without values, that we are abandoning our values. Well, we are abandoning our values. We ought to abandon our values. We ought to have only one value. What is it that’s working? What works? And that assessment is dependent on what your trying to do.” Neale Donald Walsch and Dr Brad Blanton – Honest to God: A Change of Heart That Can Change the World pg 88- 89.
“People ask me if I’m interested in evangelism. I’m not. I think the next big evangelism movement will be driven by behaving differently.” Article Ken Blanchard: Serving to Lead like Jesus,” 20th May 2004 Rebecca Barnes ChurchCentral.com (leader of Rick Warrens PEACE plan.)
“There is evidence in our data that once a change in behavior has occurred, a change in beliefs is likely to follow.” “It is usually easier to change individuals formed into a group than to change any one of them separately.” “The individual accepts the new system of values and beliefs by accepting belongingness to the group.” (Kurt Lewin in Kenneth Benne, Human Relations in Curriculum Change)
Yet it isn’t from just the fringe elements of the New Age Movement. This is a complete systemic agenda to abduct children’s hearts and minds and place them into the service of the Government or god of the day.
Our kids are under direct attack by the very foundations of our education system. As we have previously seen Bloom’s Taxonomy is about undermining the family home
“The major impact of the new program is to develop attitudes and values toward learning which are not shared by the parents.” (David Krathwohl, Benjamin Bloom, et al., Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: Book 2, Affective Domain)
What we are seeing described here is a wide spread “stolen generations” where parents cannot raise their God given children because there is an serpent whispering in the ears of children whom we have foolishly trusted. A Pied Piper who steals children and hides them away in a cave and only come out changed after the process has been completed.
That “new program” spoken of was and is called Blooms Taxonomies. Volume 1 (Educational Objectives) and 2 (Affective Domain). (It is also any other variant tool used by the system, since if Bloom’s raises enough eyebrows, they may ditch it for another method that achieves the same outcome anyhow.)
“In fact, a large part of what we call ‘good teaching’ is the teacher’s ability to attain affective objectives through challenging the student’s fixed beliefs and getting them to discuss issues.” (David Krathwohl, Benjamin Bloom, et al., Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: Book 2, Affective Domain)
At what age do you think children have formulated the mature ability to challenge their beliefs. Is not this something that some adults do and very few older teenagers do?
Even ”Discussing issues” when you examine what is discussed is always “social issues”, and as we have seen social issues are used to change values and beliefs.
Evidence, in fact, is both my children in year 4 and 5 both received a sheet for a speaking competition, outlining topics they could choose from.
The topics were:
Year 3 and 4
Racism is Bullying
Multiculturalism at the FIFA World Cup
Empathising with other people
How kids can make a difference
Every family has a story
My overseas connections
When does a migrant become an Australian?
What makes a Community?
Year 5 and 6
The meaning of Australia Day
Getting a multicultural education
Learning different languages
Multiculturalism in the Media
The same but different
Living between cultures
What is most ironic is that at the very end of the requirements for producing the speech it states
“Finally, just a reminder that the prepared speech must have multicultural content to be successful.”
No matter what the topic is about, the topic is about Multiculturalism another words.
Thus via peer pressure and the “prison pressure” what child is going to produce a speech that would criticise Multiculturalism, what child would even know one single negative about Multiculturalism?, would they have been taught it in the classroom? hardly, and what child would win no matter how good the speech, that criticises Multiculturalism?
These topics are well beyond the mental and reasoning capacity of 8 – 11 year olds, many of which cannot write, spell, or read properly. What is most notable is the fact they are SOCIAL-ISED topics just as is required to create a socialist state and socialist comrades.
Why are there no speeches dealing with facts, history, science, literature, topics that involve a definite objective that excludes the basis of opinion, and a non social, political one at that.
As is frequently the problem, the “homework” is done by most of the parents, to prop up this expensive failing system, and in turn makes the children who actually do their own homework feel dumb. stupid and useless because their work cannot come up to the standard of the parents who did it for their kids.
So what else can this “good teaching” produce in children but rebellion and demotivation! It fulfils this loss of “natural affection” as spoken of in Romans 1:31.
So let’s revisit what is the Affective Domain?
Remember Benjamin Bloom answers that stating that
“The affective domain is, in retrospect, a virtual ‘Pandora’s Box.’” “We are not entirely sure that opening our ‘box’ is necessarily a good thing; we are certain that it is not likely to be a source of peace and harmony among the members of a school staff.” “It is in this ‘box’ that the most influential controls are to be found.” “The affective domain contains the forces that determine the nature of an individual’s life and ultimately the life of an entire people” David Krathwohl, Benjamin Bloom, et al., Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: Book 2, Affective Domain
Pandora’s box is a box that once it is open cannot be shut, but once it is open, only evil comes out of it. So by their own admission they understand what they are doing. They are going to get educators to open up evil in their classrooms. The evil that lies in the heart of all human beings.
Just as we have seen by other Social Psychologists, the suppression and destruction of the conscience and parental values and beliefs, and the teasing out of the desires, passions and lusts of the heart as a means of control, is the objective.
See http://www.australiancurriculum.edu.au/GeneralCapabilities/Critical-and-creative-thinking/Introduction to see that this is central to the Australian curriculum, and if you examine this more you find that it influences all education systems world wide. Note: See how the web address uses “Critical and creative thinking”. Mikhail Bakunin said
“The passion of destruction is a creative passion.”
and Karl Marx in “The Holy Family said
“Critical Criticism is a spiritualistic lord, pure spontaneity, actus purus, intolerant of any influence from without”
Notice the only thing “toleration” will not tolerate is intolerance. That’s not very tolerant.
Alice Miel in “Human Relations in Curriculum Change” Part 2 Utilization of Dissatisfaction states that criticism should be
“… utilized at all stages of the process to keep crystallization from setting in.”
Another words keep the kids changing, do not let the process come to a standstill.
Pope Francis stated the same in what I consider to be a landmark speech that initiated the launch of the Doing, Action phase we will soon discuss stating,
“One of the faults which we occasionally observe in sociopolitical activity is that spaces and power are preferred to time and processes. Giving priority to space means madly attempting to keep everything together in the present, trying to possess all the spaces of power and of self-assertion; it is to crystallize processes and presume to hold them back.”
What he is stating here is that all the time in the world can be utilised to being about gradual imperceptible change, and that to try to seize it will “crystallize” enshrine the system as it stands now as people wake up, and jeopardise every gain that has been made.
Roman Catholic Professor Plino Correra De Olivera calls it “Unperceived Ideological Transhipment and Dialogue.” (which is transition) in a paper he wrote regarding his distaste for Vatican II.
He as a Roman Catholic was opposed to this process as he saw it as the introduction of Communism into the Church and Culture through gradualism.
He explains the methods and pragmatic outworking of taking someone from one viewpoint and bringing them across to one they originally would consider abhorrent.
This process is usually one that cannot be achieved in totality with one generation, it takes two or three generations, though those of the first generation on the whole can be brought across.
So what they are saying here is that by using dissatisfaction9 like advertising, you can
maintain students and a people in the mode of Move, which is within the Unfreeze Move Refreeze method. Thus they are always able to be changed. Persistent relativism or as George Hegel called it “flux”.
This means though that all students must come to believe as previously quoted where Blooms Taxonomy and Karl Marx state
We recognize the point of view that truth and knowledge are only relative and that there are no hard and fast truths which exist for all time and all places.” (Benjamin Bloom, Taxonomy of Educational Objectives Book 1: Cognitive Domain, pg. 32
Again the Word of God has an answer for anyone who does not want to be manipulated by these master manipulators.
The Bible says in 1 Timothy 6:5-7
“Perverse disputing’s of men of corrupt minds, and destitute of the truth, supposing that gain is godliness: from such withdraw thyself. But godliness with contentment is great gain. For we brought nothing into this world, and it is certain we can carry nothing out.”
Philippians 4:11 11
Not that I speak in respect of want: for I have learned, in whatsoever state I am, therewith to be content.
Not dissatisfied. It is only through generating discontent that advertisers get your attention upon their product which they engineer to fill the need they just created in you. The same applies in all facets of controlling people.
“Let your conversation be without covetousness; and be content with such things as ye have: for he hath said, I will never leave thee, nor forsake thee. So that we may boldly say, The Lord is my helper, and I will not fear what man shall do unto me.”
What we must learn from these passages of scripture is that the method of control being used by these Psychological Satanists is they want you to be out of control, and full of yourself. To hear only “covetousness”, “lust”, your “desires” (Pandora’s box).
Thus if you have possessions, they threaten to take them away, if you have become so perverted you cheat on your wife, have declined to liking the same sex even declined to children, this too will be used as a means of control over you.
That control is a four letter word
Fear of loss
Fear of being found out
Fear of loosing your life, love (eros) and happiness.
Righteousness is mocked and defaced by these types because they know it is the one thing that blows them out of the water.
Turn from sin now. The call of a true trumpet of God always sounds clear “Repent and Believe”.
Mark 1:15 5
“And saying, The time is fulfilled, and the kingdom of God is at hand: repent ye, and believe the gospel.”
This is the only way to find freedom and break the control of the powers of this world, but you have to give in to the will of God for your life.
Dean Gotcher says concerning the control of society writing about “Human relations in Curriculum Change”
“Published in 1951 as the result of the first Marxist training Laboratory in Bethel Maine it is THE BOOK on controlling the citizens through group meeting procedures. Based on the Directorate and Soviet systems of the French and Russian revolutions…” http://www.authorityresearch.com/2006-01%20Human%20Relations%20in%20Curriculum%20Change.htm
Criticism is the method of undermining everything. Higher Criticism was the German method of destroying faith in the Bible which coalesced in the 1881 Revised Version and now hundreds of English translations.
Remember that Bethel Maine Labs require the signing of a waiver.
Beverley K Eakman in the New American conveys in her article “Psychiatry goes back to the future” Friday, 21 August 2009 16:37
“New York Times article reveals that the “new” $117 million psychological program, similarly aimed at “preventative psychology” for soldiers, will “be introduced at two bases in October and phased in gradually throughout the service, starting in basic training.” Then in a telling statement, the article states that the program “is modeled on techniques that have been tested mainly in middle schools.”
In the early 1990s, I exposed one of those programs in Pennsylvania schools under the banner of “assessment testing.” I pointed also to an infamous psychological training ground for teachers called the National Training Laboratory in Bethel, Maine. It was eventually run under the auspices of the nation’s largest teacher union, National Education Association, which lured teachers to undergo (and emulate) encounter-style, high-stress tactics, and take them back into in their classrooms. Teachers taking the course still have to sign a disclaimer prior to enrolment, absolving the NEA of all liability in the event that they experience an emotional breakdown while pursuing their studies at the NTL!” http://www.thenewamerican.com/culture/family/item/495-psychiatry-goes-back-to-the-future
This is backed up by numerous testimonies to the intensity of the process.
“For some the T-group was very stressful. That stress manifested itself in different ways for different people. A New York City school principal who had been criticized in the morning group tried to commit suicide by jumping off a bridge into a lobster pond.” pg 89 Planet Paradise and the law of the Law of the Jungle, by Morris Haimowitz.
Are kids today stressed at school? Is that a good environment to learn or break a person down to form an new personality?
One informant of the problems with what was going on in these training labs and such was Dr William Coulson. Earned his bachelors degree in 1955 from Arizona State University, doing graduate work at Loyola between 1957 and 1964. Obtained a Masters then PhD in philosophy from Notre Dame, and attended Berkley for his Ed.D studying psychology, and becoming a graduate under Carl Rogers.
Coulson worked under Rogers at the Western Behaviorial Sciences Institute learning over 15 years how to perform Rogers nondirective psychotherapy.
This is what he wrote about an experiment in Los Angeles with a Collage, 2 High Schools and 60 elementary schools all part of the California Institute of the Sisters of the Most Holy and Immaculate Heart of the Blessed Virgin Mary.
“The entire school system began to crumble under the weight of too much feeling expression. [We] put the administrators, teaching nuns and students through truth labs. The sisters began to speak out long-buried emotions and to allow themselves to experience thoughts long submerged in prayer. Soon they were appearing at labs in civvies and Cardinal McIntyre pronounced he never wanted to see a nun in a miniskirt again. They went back to habits, then returned to civvies. By spring 1968, the transformation was in full swing. Today there is no more Immaculate Heart religious order, just as there is no more Immaculate Heart College. The nuns had become ‘continually aware of their feelings,’ eager to express them and eager to hear the feelings of others. The institution didn’t survive.”
Rogers and I…called it Therapy for Normals, TFN. The IHMs had some 60 schools when we started; at the end, they had one. There were some 615 nuns when we began. Within a year after our first interventions, 300 of them were petitioning Rome to get out of their vows. They did not want to be under anyone’s authority, except the authority of their imperial inner selves.
“…it destroyed Catholic religious profession, just as it would destroy the practice of medicine if medicine took seriously the idea that all the answers are within the students; so, too, did it destroy the vows of the nuns. There were many priests who didn’t even bother to get laicized. They just left, saying, “My vows don’t count for anything, because they came from somewhere else; they didn’t come from within.” Blumenfeld Education Letter May 1990 “An interview with Dr William Coulson on the origins and dangers of “Affective Education”. and Vol. 3, No. 1, January-February 1994 issue of
“The Latin Mass.”
These nuns became a varied array of characters including radical feminists and lesbians.
If this is what can happen to adults, and adults with strong convictions, what about
children with unformed values and beliefs?
Reading Dr Joseph Bean M.D in his “Public Education – A River of Pollution” he discusses the method of changing values in people stating
“Third Force principles have not improved education: they have replaced education… UNFREEZING the child’s values and standards, CHANGING the child by giving him different standards and a different conception of who he is, and thirdly, REFREEZING, to lock the child into the new self. He then is supposed to be a self-actualising person. After the re-freezing is accomplished, it is impossible for the child to communicate with the conventional person, including his parents. He operates on a different wave length, and though in conversation he will use the same words he formally used, the meaning of those words to him will be entirely different from their meaning as understood by his parents.” pg 3 Disaster Road by Jean M Wallis.
Chapter 7 of “Human relations in Curriculum Change” is called “Force Field Analysis Applied to a School Situation”.
No wonder why teenagers go into a “cocoon” and hibernate in their bedrooms, behind their headphones, and their technology. Is this normal behaviour, or are we seeing the new “normal” in the socialisation of children who can no longer “…communicate with the conventional person, including his parents…”
Proverbs state to “flee youthful lusts” so there is a natural tendency to have a strong urge toward the flaming desires of younger years, but the wisdom is not about “biding your time” till you come out of these lusts. These lust remain with you for life. Instead Proverbs is establishing a pattern of behaviour that is required for a lifetime to continually be fleeing youthful lusts.
All that is being done in our culture by dupes and wicked knowledgeable persons is to encourage the loss of self control, and as we have seen, not without purpose.
Kurt Lewin states
“‘Catharsis’ seems to be necessary… to bring about deliberately an emotional stir-up”
We have heard Kurt Lewin speak about force field analysis and we’ve heard about Third Force.
What are “Third Force” principles? And where do they originate?
We are told in a paper called “The Failure of the Human Potential Movement: From self-actualization to experientialism” by Geoffrey Hill (c) 1998 he states
“Third Force Psychology has created its own technology, it’s own mechanism of operation, found largely in gestalt, encounter, experientialism and body work. In fact, one of the founding fathers, Abraham Maslow, suggested that the movement is a science”
Third Force Psychology is Human Potential Philosophy and even though the philosophy is failed, as a movement it moves impetuously defying it’s lifeless soul like an undead ghoul.
Consider these words of Feminist Gloria Steinem, editor of Ms Magazine (funded by the CIA) and her take on the task of education
“By the year 2000, we will, I hope raise our children to believe in human potential, not God.”
This movement is deeply rooted inside the Church, and social doctrine driven by the pseudo science of psychology (the study of the soul / psyche).
If we examine Abraham Maslow on Third Force Psychology we find he claims a form of Marxism into his theory in that it is dialectic.
Bloom talks about Maslow’s work in his Taxonomies. Would you want your child’s education based on a man whose work is as follows?
“So it looks as if nudism is the first step toward ultimate free-animality-humanness. It’s the easiest to take. Must encourage it.” “… nakedness is absolutely right. So is the attack on antieroticism, the Christian & Jewish foundations. Must move in the direction of the Reichian orgasm.” “This movement can be dignified and Apollonian …. I must put as much of this as is possible & usable in my education book, & more & more in succeeding writings.” (Abraham Maslow, Maslow’s Journals)
Maslow is anti Jewish and anti Christian. He is opposed to what he sees as “antieroticism”. Like all people who lack any form of self control or restraint, any denial of self or self restraint is painted as completely opposed to a position. Yet it appears Maslow and those in association are the extremists wanting no restraint.
Bloom’s taxonomies were dedicated to Wilheim Reich as Maslow mentions in his previous quote.(May I advise you examine the work of Reich to see what madness we are talking about.)
Wilheim Reich and Kurt Lewin both edited the Journal of the Institute for Social Research (Zeitschrift für Sozialforschung)
Abraham Maslow acknowledged that the dialectical, Dionysian structure of the “Taxonomy” resulted in an “Esalen-type, orgiastic, Dionysian-type education.” (Abraham Maslow The Journals of Abraham Maslow) http://www.authorityresearch.com/2010-01%20A%20precis%20of%20Blooms%20Taxonomy.htm
It is nice to know what the bare bones of our education system look like. It is also nice to know what the future of our society will look like (our children and grandchildren and so on, remember Pope Francis I’s “space and power vs time and process yet little can they admit that the eternal and constant rule over all).
Consider the language used by psychologist Abraham Maslow
“Third-Force psychology is also epi-Marxian in these senses, i.e., including the most basic scheme as true-good social conditions are necessary for personal growth, bad social conditions stunt human nature, material conditions are prepotent over spiritual ones, & SA [Self-Actualized] potentials, religious, laws philosophy, ideology, are in fact all by-products of basic social & economic conditions, while cutting out the dogmatic Marxian a priori crap. This is to say, one could reinterpret Marx into a self-actualization-fostering Third- and Fourth-Force psychology-philosophy. The Journals of A.H. Maslow, Volumes I and II. Lowry R.J. (1979) (ed) Monterey: Brooks/Cole Publishing Company
The creation of self-actualized individuals is the objective / outcome for children in the education system.
Notice at the end of Maslow’s statement he mentions both Third Force and a Fourth Force Psychology.
This is critical that you see this because we have been speaking about Third Force Psychology in education. This is veritably equitable to dialogue (thinking and feeling) which is what psycho therapy is about.
What is important in establishing further insights into what they have for our children we must understand what Fourth Force entails. I mention this because we have just embarked upon this Fourth Force.
Notice that this is all religious in tone and nature,
“Salvation is a byproduct of Self-Actualization Duty.” Abraham Maslow Maslow on Management 1998
And again quoting Maslow,
“Seeking for personal salvation is anyway the wrong road to salvation. The only path was the Ikiru path―salvation via hard work & total commitment to doing well the job, fate or personal task destiny called you to―an important job that ‘called for ‘ doing.” The Journals of A.H. Maslow, Volumes I and II. Lowry R.J. (1979) (ed)
Importantly Karl Marx was not totally void of religious sentiment and we hear his echo in Abraham Maslow for in his Thesis on Feuerbach #8 he writes
“All social life is essentially practical. All mysteries which lead theory to mysticism find their rational solution in human practice and in the comprehension of this practice.”
Thus liberation theology or the social gospel fall into this self same field.
Recently at a Christmas work training session (a very lame United Nations Life long learning indoctrination session) we were given a diagram showing us a box with the top as Think, the right side as Feel, the bottom as Do. (Notice though the left side of the box is blank. I’ll deal with this shortly as this is critical is showing we are being led into a new spirituality. )
Quoting from Zero Incident Process Factsheet 6 put out by Sentis
“… the brain is an incredible machine that can only work with the
information you give it [or given to it by the authorities]. In the human brain, it is our conscious mind (or 7 Units) that programs our subconscious via the Framing (Think-Feel-Do) process.”
This process is in violation of Section 116 of the Australian Constitution which reads)
116 Commonwealth not to legislate in respect of religion
The Commonwealth shall not make any law for establishing any religion,
or for imposing any religious observance, or for prohibiting the free
exercise of any religion, and no religious test shall be required as a
qualification for any office or public trust under the Commonwealth.
It may at first appear as a small thing but the way this “religious test” is being implemented is but reframing the terms. In this instance this was structured around workplace “Safety” a key give away word that found the guillotine implemented in the French Revolution and the Gulags implemented in the USSR.
It violates the Constitution because as it is stated, it is a process, and processes lead to an end result. They say the result is SAFTEY, but I will show you the actual result.
What is uncanny is that we have the same language coming out from religious circles.
Consider Rick Warren and David Paul Yonggi Cho. Both support and endorse each other and it is not surprising.
Rick Warren harps on a lot about “Paradigm Shift”.
He also states that when you speak of repentance speak of paradigm shift.
“I preach on repentance every single Sunday without using the word because the word is misused today, it is misunderstood. So I talk about changing your mind and I talk about paradigm shift.” Purpose Driven Preaching and Interview with Rick Warren by Michael Duduit Preaching Magazine September – October 2001.
David Paul Yonggi Cho of the Korean Full Gospel Church who wrote the book “The Fourth Dimension”. Now let me show you that they are both speaking the same language.
Consider this from Marilyn Ferguson’s “The Aquarian Conspiracy” who knitted these together back in 1980 prior to Warren and Cho
“That is paradigm change—transformation. It is the fourth dimension of change.” pg 72
The Fourth Dimension of Yonggi Cho is experiential and experience can only be had through doing. (Cho has synthesised Christianity and Buddhism together)
Thus it is apt that Rick Warren uses scripture to sure up Maslow’s philosophy and in turn disarming Christian objection (though insightful people may experience confusion: con-fusion is the transition point through which you move people from con-science to con-sensus.) when he stated
“The purpose of the Bible is Life Change. It is not doctrine, it is not reproof, it is not correction, it is not training in righteousness, the purpose of the Bible is Life Change. Specifically it wants to change 2 things. Our character… and to change our conduct… to do every kind of good deed.” Preaching for Life Change 2001
Thus Rick Warren claims the purpose of the the Bible is good works. This is the Third and Forth Force.
Change (Dialogue) and Action (Praxis).
Purpose is used as an existential term.
So not only are our kids copping this indoctrination from school, the whole family cops it from church, entertainment and the parents cop it in the workplace.
It is then not surprising that the current Pope Francis I considers social outreach rather than doctrinal battles, to be the essential business of the church as stated in his first speech as Pope.
(Both these options though are false since Jesus told us to take the gospel of Jesus Christ into all the world which is different from social action.)
This is no different to Marilyn Ferguson’s “The Aquarian Conspiracy who says
“A new world—a new perspective on reality— is indispensable to a new politics. “A turning of the mind,” Huxley called it. … Eventually, anyone concerned with the transformation of the individual must engage in social action.” pg 190 – 191 The Aquarian Conspiracy by Marilyn Ferguson.
One excellent source who was trained in this thinking as a teacher, has spoken at the United Nations about how to do this process and has since truly repented and come to Christ and stands against the “change”. Dean Gotcher states
“Diaprax is “equality of opportunity,” where everybody can participate in that which he has in common with all of mankind, i.e. his earthy nature. Diaprax is sensuousness and spontaneity no longer restrained by un-natural, anti-carnal (spiritual) laws. Diaprax is sensuousness and spontaneity emancipated within an “open-ended,” “non-directed” environment which is “tolerant of ambiguity.” Diaprax is patricide, i.e. the annihilation of the patriarchal paradigm of ‘fixity’ by the emancipation of the heresiarchal paradigm of a process of ‘change.’ Diaprax is incest, i.e. the praxis of consensus, i.e. man worshipping the common-collective sensuous ‘moment’ of oneness, man united upon an orgiastic, “Dionysian ego which does not negate any more.” (Norman O. Brown, Life Against Death.)”
In short he is saying the only acceptable belief system is no belief system, instead Nikes or more Herbart Marcuse’s “Just Do it” applies.
(Advertising getting in on the act of indoctrinating). The one below on the right is more appropriate to the situation.
Alister Crowley’s “Do what thou Wilt” or Anton La Veys “To thine own self be true”. That all authority must be negated, neutralised, Bible, Church, leaders, Fathers, Parents, etc. Thus there is no more conscience, no more little voice saying NO, don’t do that.
Regarding the social agenda of “good works” which all the churches are getting into today under the banner of “missions” I quote a Polish Jesuit Piotz Garagah regarding the retaking of Poland by the Catholic Church
“The country would be reconquered for Rome, not by force or with steel, but by virtuous example, teaching, discussion, gentle intercourse, and persuasion” from Richard Bennett’s talk on Poland.
Providing a virtuous example is no different to Occultist H P Blavatsky
“ …even in the absence of… great gifts one may do good in a smaller and humbler way by taking note and exposing the crying vices and evils of the day, by word and deed, by publications and practical example. Let the force of that example impress others to follow it; and then instead of deriding our doctrines and aspirations the men of the XXth, if not the XIXth century will see…” Theosophy or Jesuitism by H P Blavatsky Published in Lucifer June 1888.
At the 2009 ISNA Islamic Convention Rick Warren stated
“I’m not interested in Interfaith dialogue. I am interested in Interfaith Projects. There’s a big difference. Talk is very cheap… Love is something you do. It’s something that we do together. Love is a verb.”
This means we have gone from Vatican II (Dialogue) to a new phase of CHANGE (humanistic repentance) through pracis (works, doing) bringing in the Age of Aquarius.
Love is not what we think it means though, all words have different meaning depending on what level of the Plan you are on. remember children can no longer communicate because they are on a different wave length.
I will allow Jesuit Teilhard De Chardin to spell out the meaning of love for us.
“Love, in fact, is the agent of universal synthesis.”
This love is the Greek word “eros”, a Greek word not used in the New Testament. This work is where we get the word erotic. It is sexual passion, coined in the popular phrase by Herbert Marcuse in his “Eros and Civilisation “make love, not war.”
This brings me to the side of the box that was empty. I believe it was empty for a reason, because sometimes what is not spoken is just as significant as what is spoken. Since it is a process, it was not left out because it was not applicable, but rather that step in the process we are not ready for.
The whole purpose of the process is “Change” as declared by Marx’s Feuerbach Thesis 11. Such a change is also endorsed by Rick Warren who says to call “repentance” which is a change of heart and mind (but more than that in reality) “paradigm shift” a term first coined by Thomas Kuhn who wrote “The Structure of Scientific Revolutions”.
(A scientific revolution is the first step to Communism and is called Scientific Socialism.)
This change eventually will answer the dryness of materialistic evolution and dialectical materialism which will migrate the whole world into a new spirituality.
Thus the unnamed side of the box should naturally flow from think, feel, do and finally be. (Be, being, or become).
As Teilhard De Chardin wrote in his book The Phenomenon of Man Book 4 Survival
“Accordingly, the march of humanity, as a prolongation of that of all other animate forms, develops indubitably in the direction of a conquest of matter put to the service of the mind. Increased power for increased action. But finally, and above all, increased action for increased being.” pg 149
As Mahatma Gandhi is quoted of saying “Be the change you want to see”, though it is conjecture whether he said that at all or at least that it might be a popularised adjusted statement of his, I think the point is made. We can see what spirit is speaking through him.
This would be consistent since Gandhi was a Theosophist who was supportive of Annie Besant, successor to Madam Blavatsky.(See my post on Yoga Part 1 .)
It is in this piece on Yoga that I found this folded into this
“The Divine Word is HU. The scriptures of the East and West are referring to HU when they mention the Divine Word. Hazrat Inayat Khan also describes it as the “abstract sound” or the “sound of the abstract plane” and provides this inspiring information: “It was the ‘saut-e sarmad’, the sound of the abstract plane that Muhammad heard in the cave of Ghar-e Hira when he became lost in his divine ideal. The Qur’an refers to this sound in the words ‘be! And all became’. Hazrat Inayat Khan, The Music of Life, Omega Publications (1983) ISBN 0-930872-38-X
Rumi’s poetry nicely complements the inspiring thoughts of Hazrat Inayat Khan: “When one is united to the core of another, to speak of that is to breathe the name HU, empty of self, filled with love. -Rumi” http://sureshemre.wordpress.com/2010/09/04/sound-archetype-hu/
Thus we are very close upon the final destination of all this shifting, changing. To that of “becoming” once this phase of “doing” is through.
This becoming is the deification of Mankind which naturally they call Humanity, utilising the Hu from Sanskrit meaning to “invoke the gods or the authority” thus humans in it’s very word word means God-man. This is why Human rights is antithetical to inalienable rights.
(Yes Human is also claimed to be from the Latin, but as with all things there is the surface meaning which everyday people take at face value, then there is the substrata of meanings which is everywhere in our society. Just walk into a court room or listen to a politician.)
The last (endless: because there is no “fixity” since all is in flux always) stage is when people children and adults loose all restraint and come to the final position on what is called the spectrum. A 7 phased movement of transition through value and behaviour change depicting where you are within the process. This is detailed by Carl Rogers.
7 PHASES of Carl Rogers
Stage One : The client is very defensive, and extremely resistant to change.
Stage Two : Client becomes slightly less rigid, and will talk about external events or other people.
Stage Three : Client talks about her/himself, but as an object. Avoids discussion of present events.
Stage Four : Client begins to talk about deep feelings and develops a relationship with the therapist.
The next three stages represent substantial growth in the person’s journey of self-actualization
Stage Five : Client can express present emotions, and are beginning to rely more on their own decision making abilities and increasingly accept more responsibility for their actions.
Stage Six : The client shows rapid growth toward congruence, and begin to develop unconditional positive regard for others. This stage signals the end for the need for formal therapy
Stage Seven : The client is a fully functioning, self actualized individual who is empathic and shows unconditional positive regard for others. This individual can relate their previous therapy to present day real-life situations.
He continues explaining the end goal of “becoming”
“At one end of the continuum the individual avoids close relationships, which are perceived as being dangerous. At the other end he lives openly and freely in relation to the therapist and to others, guiding his behavior on the basis of his immediate experiencing – he has become an integrated process of changingness.” Carl Rogers On Becoming a Person
Thus all is relative, no absolutes. “Perpetual revolution” endless change. These people he called the “People of Tomorrow”.
This is what is also called Self-Actualisation or Self-Realisation, which is the end goal, to produce children who are self-actualised.
Notice specifically Stage 7. This shows us unconditional positive regard for others. Seriously consider what outcomes would eventuate for an individual who has that attitude and applies it in a world of fallen sinful self centred men? Whose going to be taken for all they’ve got? This is not wisdom, this is foolishness.
Let me show in correlation to this statement by Rogers in the definition of a Mantra
“The translation from Sanskrit is man, meaning to think and tra, meaning to be liberated.” from.”http://www.lighthousetrailsresearch.com/newsletters/2014/newsletter20140127.htm#6
It is this liberation that is the objective through this 7 phased movement which uncannily mirrors the 7 chakras as taught in Hinduism (or the Western take on Hinduism.)
As one passes through to eventual “liberation” or “emancipation” (and the psychological and social use behind those terms), one in both respects “becomes” and all things are transcendent, there is no right or wrong!
As Dean Gotcher puts it
“The classroom experience provided not only the realization and the actualization of the rebellious mind it provided the collective approval and support of its expression (against the patriarchal parent) as the common cause―emancipation.” Concerning Bloom’s Taxonomies, http://www.authorityresearch.com/2008-09-06%20Concerning%20Bloom’s%20Taxonomies.htm
It is not surprising that both Psychology and Hinduism find affinity within Communism and Marxism. Since Transformational Marxism is Mystical Marxism which is what Blooms Taxonomy is geared towards generating.
“The use of ‘critical theory’ as a code word, which already becomes evident in Horkheimer’s early writings, enabled a certain interpretation of Marxism to enter academic discourse. Horkheimer’s purpose in critical theory was to militate against: all attempts to construct a fixed system, every attempt to identify the subject with the object.” “Humanistic potential (3rd Force psychology) is what critical inquiry must clarify. Grounding itself within the tradition of emancipation, in theory and practice . . . emancipation lies in fantasy and the language of experience irreducible to linguistic rules: mimesis.” Stephen Eric Bronner Critical Theory and its Theorists.
Seriously, could there be any more poignant terms used to make clear the connections than in Bronner’s above quote.
The symmetry with all human systems of thought or rather anti Christ thought, which is all there is outside of Christ, is seen clearly in the following from Founder of the Church of Satan, Anton La Vey who finds agreement with Bronner who states
“Fantasy is a “magic weapon” in Satanism. Fantasy plays an important role in any religious curriculum for the subjective mind is less discriminating about the quality of it’s food than it is about the taste, thus fantasy is utilized as a magic weapon. The Satanist maintains a storehouse of fantasy gathered from all cultures and from all ages.”
If emancipation lies in fantasy, as they say then humanistic potential is a religious curriculum!
Our secular schools are not only teaching kids how to think satanically but to behave satanically. When you remove religion and true spirituality from the system you are left with flesh. This is the fundamental tenant of Satanism. If this is how you think feel and act then you are a practising Satanist.
Norman O’Brown states also makes this clear.
“Psychoanalysis is the heir to a mystical tradition which it must affirm (the ‘magical’ body of occidental mysticism, and the ‘diamond’ body of oriental mysticisms, and, in psychoanalysis, the polymorphously perverse body of childhood.”
Marx tried to clean Hegel from mythology and Hegel tried to clean up Gnosticism from it’s mythology. Thus we have modern day Gnosticism using scientific, academic language.
This is practise not gone by the wayside. Far from it.
As author Marilyn Ferguson of The Aquarian Conspiracy writes regarding a program called “Human Goals” which was knocked back in 1975, where a virtually similar program was resold as “Leadership and Management Training”
“Matteson knew that he could never get away with teaching meditation to the navy. He knew that he was also unlikely to get approval for teaching the relaxation-response technique adapted by Herbert Benson of Harvard from Transcendental Meditation. .. they also brought in a Florida swim coach who had used the technique to train a university team. The meditative technique, cleansed of ideology, was a smash.” pg 236 – 237 The Aquarian Conspiracy by Marilyn Ferguson.
The Underground History of American Education by John Gatto also informs us on pgs 37 – 40 how the modern concept of education was adopted from Hinduism by Andrew Bell and his rival Joseph Landcaster and it’s ability to keep it’s caste system in place and knowledge specific to those entitled to it.
“What few knew then or realize now is that they were also a Hindu invention, designed with the express purpose of retarding intellectual development.” pg 37 The Underground History of American Education by John Gatto
So again a system forged in foreign ideology is disassembled, the ideological baggage discarded and reassembled in a new land to make a new people.
Maslow also explains where this is going and shows us by his use of terms, that it is all a word game. The terms which appear to possess scientific form are clearly religious and spiritual in reality.
“We must ultimately assume at the highest theoretical levels of enlightenment … a preference or a tendency … to identify with more and more of the world, moving toward the ultimate of mysticism, a fusion with the world, or peak experience, cosmic consciousness, etc.” (Abraham Maslow, Maslow on Management)
Maslow is speaking about the general tendency within the fleshly nature of man to gravitate towards becoming ONE with the environment, ONE with creation, ONE in relationship with ALL people and ALL things. This is the penultimate incestuous act that Freud talks about. The children becoming One with the Mother, Mother Earth.
These are the men whose work has laid the foundation for not just what our children are taught, but HOW they are taught, how the environment is shaped around our children and us as parents to impose psychological and even psychic pressure upon young impressionable souls.
Upon parents, how? Theodor Adorno states it simply by
“Using social environmental forces to change the parent’s behavior toward the child.” T. W. Adorno, The Authoritarian Personality
They are using our behaviour (which has been manipulated to conform through social pressures) towards the child as furtherance of their indoctrination.
As we have seen before from a number of sources, change in behaviour naturally leads to the tendency to a change in beliefs.
Your first reaction, is “Oh, not me. I’m an independent thinker.”
No you are not, even the writing of this had me see serious shortcomings within myself.
One example was in reading the following
“A Dialogue is essentially a conversation between equals.” “A key difference between a dialogue and an ordinary discussion is that, within the latter [in a discussion] people usually hold relatively fixed positions and argue in favour of their views as they try to convince others to change. At best this may produce agreement or compromise, but it does not give rise to anything creative.” “The purpose of dialogue is to reveal the incoherence in our thought … genuine and creative collective consciousness.” “What is essential here [in the consensus process] is the presence of the spirit of dialogue, which is in short, the ability to hold many points of view in suspension, along with a primary interest in the creation of common meaning.” (Bohm and Peat, Science, Order, and Creativity)
The two emphasised points described me perfectly, though they are contradictory. This means nothing short of double mindedness and double heartedness as per James 4:8-9 which reads
“Draw nigh to God, and he will draw nigh to you. Cleanse your hands, ye sinners; and purify your hearts, ye double minded. Be afflicted, and mourn, and weep: let your laughter be turned to mourning, and your joy to heaviness.”
and 1 Chronicles 12:33
“Of Zebulun, such as went forth to battle, expert in war, with all instruments of war, fifty thousand, which could keep rank: they were not of double heart.”
It is simply impossible to go to war if you are of two opinions, you become stuck in I think and I feel and are incapable of doing. Instead it works the other direction, God tells you, you become first. That is being redeemed from the world unto God. Now you know the truth and are free to move towards doing, thinking from the Word of God and Feeling as God would have you feel over and above the physical senses.
“They speak vanity every one with his neighbour: with flattering lips and with a double heart do they speak. The LORD shall cut off all flattering lips, and the tongue that speaketh proud things:”
The direction of the social psychologists is inversed like all things opposed to God. You think and feel first, this redeems you from the Father in Heaven and on earth, and Reconciles you to the world (this is committing, as Marcuse says, the original sin for which there is no more forgiveness – if you remain there), you then move to doing, then you become… god.
Let me explain this further from a Biblical perspective vs a unbiblical (relativistic) perspective (since that is all you are left with when you are removed from a position of truth and authority).
If the system we are now based on is one of sense and what makes sense, like in Karl Marx’s Dialectical Materialism or Socratic Critical Theory when we examine scripture on this idea of, “if you do not see it then it does not exist”, we find God turns the tables on all our wisdom.
In examining Romans 8:28-31 we find a diametrically opposed way of thinking as Isaiah 55:7-9 says
“ Let the wicked forsake his way, and the unrighteous man his thoughts: and let him return unto the LORD, and he will have mercy upon him; and to our God, for he will abundantly pardon. For my thoughts are not your thoughts, neither are your ways my ways, saith the LORD. For as the heavens are higher than the earth, so are my ways higher than your ways, and my thoughts than your thoughts.”
So let us examine Romans 8:28-31
“And we know that all things work together for good to them that love God, to them who are the called according to his purpose. 29 For whom he did foreknow, he also did predestinate to be conformed to the image of his Son, that he might be the firstborn among many brethren. 30 Moreover whom he did predestinate, them he also called: and whom he called, them he also justified: and whom he justified, them he also glorified. 31 What shall we then say to these things? If God be for us, who can be against us?
When you come to get even an inkling of the dizzying heights of the heavens and heights of the thoughts of God you will come to one clear understanding of how all the things we see or sense as bad is all for our good for those of us in Christ.
So let’s look at the detail that lies here in one of the great mysteries of God. His predestination of the Saints as a complete trouncing of the materialistic worldview.
I will hopefully approach this from a direction unanticipated from the usual, for the Lord opened these things today after years of pigeon holing information but not understanding what I had holed up until now.
The Greek for “predestinate” proori,zw pro’orizo. Pro’orizo made up of two Greek words pros meaning before or pre, and ‘orizo where we derive our word horizon.
Thus to be predestinated is to be fore – horizoned.
A designation of a given area of which you will not depart.
Now you may ask how does that overthrow the material worldview?
This is God’s forehorizioning of His saints. This means we are in His sights if we are within this realm of the horizon.
As David spoke in 1 Samuel 26:22-24
“22 And David answered and said, Behold the king’s spear! and let one of the young men come over and fetch it. 23 The LORD render to every man his righteousness and his faithfulness: for the LORD delivered thee into my hand to day, but I would not stretch forth mine hand against the LORD’S anointed. 24 And, behold, as thy life was much set by this day in mine eyes, so let my life be much set by in the eyes of the LORD, and let him deliver me out of all tribulation.”
Abrijam ruled in Jerusalem for 3 years because of the eyes of the Lord upon David even in his passing 1 Kings 15:5
“Because David did that which was right in the eyes of the LORD, and turned not aside from any thing that he commanded him all the days of his life, save only in the matter of Uriah the Hittite.”
Thus the Lord can call that which is not as though it was. See
If the Lord see you even in death, they you are and be, for your being is in Him.
Another example is in 1 Kings 15:11-12
“And Asa did that which was right in the eyes of the LORD, as did David his father. 12 And he took away the sodomites out of the land, and removed all the idols that his fathers had made.”
The Psalmist writes in Psalm 119:130-135
“130 The entrance of thy words giveth light; it giveth understanding unto the simple. 131 I opened my mouth, and panted: for I longed for thy commandments. 132 Look thou upon me, and be merciful unto me, as thou usest to do unto those that love thy name. 133 Order my steps in thy word: and let not any iniquity have dominion over me. 134 Deliver me from the oppression of man: so will I keep thy precepts. 135 Make thy face to shine upon thy servant; and teach me thy statutes.”
Again the matter is reinforced in Psalm 34:15
“The eyes of the LORD are upon the righteous, and his ears are open unto their cry.
Isaiah speaks of Messiah as one predestined in Isaiah 49:5
“5 And now, saith the LORD that formed me from the womb to be his servant, to bring Jacob again to him, Though Israel be not gathered, yet shall I be glorious in the eyes of the LORD, and my God shall be my strength.”
Noah was in the eyes of the Lord in Genesis 6:8
“But Noah found grace in the eyes of the LORD.
Here is the key as to why people cannot see God Romans 3:18
8 There is no fear of God before their eyes.
That is why Psalm 111:10 states
“The fear of the LORD is the beginning of wisdom: a good understanding have all they that do his commandments: his praise endureth for ever.”
If you fear God you begin to come into His horizon and can begin to see God and begin in walking in His ways.
Whilst man claims that if they cannot see God then He does not exist. The reality is displayed that if God does not see you, then you do not exist. God will not see your troubles, He will not hear your prayers and cries, for you placed yourself out of His sight, in fact you were place out of His sight.
Notice how the wisdom of God fulfils His word in Psalm 64:8
“So they shall make their own tongue to fall upon themselves: all that see them shall flee away.”
Finally but certainly not exhaustively, I refer to 2 Chronicles 16:9
“For the eyes of the LORD run to and fro throughout the whole earth, to shew himself strong in the behalf of them whose heart is perfect toward him.”
Though the eyes of the Lord run throughout the Earth He only sees those whose hearts are perfect towards Him showing himself. Perfect no meaning sinless but mature.
Thus it is essential to remain within eyeshot of God. Those who want to be out of His sight are those who want to behave naughtily, not that He is unaware of their disobedience. When His eye turns to those ones, it is in judgement and vengeance.
It is thus good to be the “apple of His eye” that is in the horizon of His Iris. Of which there is too much to detail and wisdom to explain here now.
“Keep me as the apple of the eye, hide me under the shadow of thy wings…”
“For the LORD’S portion is his people; Jacob is the lot of his inheritance. 10 He found him in a desert land, and in the waste howling wilderness; he led him about, he instructed him, he kept him as the apple of his eye. 11 As an eagle stirreth up her nest, fluttereth over her young, spreadeth abroad her wings, taketh them, beareth them on her wings: 12 So the LORD alone did lead him, and there was no strange god with him.
If we are the apple of His eye, if we are in the sight of God, if we start in fear and grow into love, if we are pre-horizoned (predestined) do not seek to go out of His presence for if you are seen of God then you have BEING, you BE, and have BECOME or at the very least are BECOMING.
“For in him we live, and move, and have our being”
If His eyes are not upon you then you are “dead” in your trespasses and sins. You cease to BE.
Thus to be is to be seen by God!
Make yourself seen by God by confessing your sin and repenting and no hiding as Adam and Eve did in the garden from His sight. Be seen and be humble for you are nothing, let Him bring you into being by restoring you to His image. You cannot become His image and likeness unless you also have Him in your horizon
It has been noted that people acquire the likeness of each other the longer they are together. Over decades husbands and wives take on similar features as do owners of animals.
“Mine eyes are ever toward the LORD; for he shall pluck my feet out of the net.”
“Behold, as the eyes of servants look unto the hand of their masters, and as the eyes of a maiden unto the hand of her mistress; so our eyes wait upon the LORD our God, until that he have mercy upon us.”
“Open thou mine eyes, that I may behold wondrous things out of thy law.”
Is your being in the eyes of the Lord?
So this now brings me to dealing with the fourth side of the box which after what we have seen is an inevitable consequence and would be called 5th Force Psychology, which is also called “spiritual psychology” as explained further
“Although notions such as the collective unconscious refer to states of mind that are deeper than or beyond our normal ego consciousness, “transcendent” refers to a completely sovereign or soul awareness without the slightest inclination to define itself as anything outside itself including contents of the mind, either conscious or unconscious, personal or collective (i.e., awareness that is not only transegoic but transmind). This distinction between transpersonal and transcendent awareness may lead to the emergence of a fifth force or more purely spiritual psychology.” http://www.awakeningonline.com/htms/Transpersonal.htm
This is virtually no different from the outcomes of (TM) Transcendental meditation. (See my post on Yoga)
“… an emerging transpersonal-phenomenological psychology (Valle, 1995)”
Also called Existential phenomenology or Existential psychology.
“Then what is left? What is left is this, “I am.” Thus act of contact and acceptance with “I am,” once gotten hold of, gave me (what I think was for me the first time) the experience since I am, I have the right to be. What is this experience like?… It is the experience of my own aliveness… It is my saying to Descartes, “I AM, therefore, I think, I feel, I do.” pg 43 Existence by Rollo May.
Notice there lies the think, feel and do.
As it appeared in a 1982 novel Deadeye Dick by Kurt Vonnegut a mention of this graffiti states:
“To be is to do”—Socrates.
“To do is to be”—Jean-Paul Sartre.
“Do be do be do”—Frank Sinatra.
As it is said “Don’t study Marx, Be Marx.”
The key thought here is to note the use of “I AM” in capital letters.
I AM is equitable to I be or becoming as Paul C. Vitz states in his excellent work
“This “I am” experience is the basic experience of being…” pg 12 Psychology as Religion by Paul C. Vitz.
This is clear reference to once again the consistent obsession with inverting the Bible.
In Exodus 3:13-14
“And Moses said unto God, Behold, when I come unto the children of Israel, and shall say unto them, The God of your fathers hath sent me unto you; and they shall say to me, What is his name? what shall I say unto them? 14 And God said unto Moses, I AM THAT I AM: and he said, Thus shalt thou say unto the children of Israel, I AM hath sent me unto you.”
God declares to Moses that his name is I AM.
Jesus did the very same in John 8:57-59
“Then said the Jews unto him, Thou art not yet fifty years old, and hast thou seen Abraham? Jesus said unto them, Verily, verily, I say unto you, Before Abraham was, I am. Then took they up stones to cast at him: but Jesus hid himself, and went out of the temple, going through the midst of them, and so passed by.”
Here, Jesus makes himself to be the one who was speaking to Moses (and predating even Abraham), thus claiming he was God. This is consistent with the Jews then going to stone him to death. The basis of which would have been blasphemy.
This is frequently shown right before our eyes. here are some examples that have probably slipped right past you though when you see them you will say “Oh yeah I knew that”.
If that is what you say, this should show you clearly that you are being brainwashed without you being aware.
We also have pop stars using it creatively in their name like rapper will.i.am
and OTO member Beyonce in her I AM tour. With Baphomet costume.
Yet do not think this is a Western phenomenon, this is a Global indoctrination right now in preparation for the next phase. Consider this ad from Asia
A 2014 event in Queensland Australia stating on it’s website
IATCM is a complete framework and road map to creating an abundance of health and wealth, through mind, body, money and soul.
To Guide and support 1000 generation x families or individuals, who are retiring sooner, teaching their kids to follow their heart and creating a financial contribution to their retiring parents.
What is I AM looking for.
“I AM the Change Movement” is looking for 1000 individuals or families who wish to become teachers, to undergo a complete lifestyle makeover and transformation. Physically, emotionally spiritually and financially.
These sort of “social experiments” are the coming global mindset.
A new free documentary has come out called I AM and and again this is further indoctrination for “truthers” who are in the words of 2 Timothy 3:7
“Ever learning, and never able to come to the knowledge of the truth.”
“I AM is an utterly engaging and entertaining non-fiction film that poses two practical and provocative questions: what’s wrong with our world, and what can we do to make it better? [my note: aka Social Action] The filmmaker behind the inquiry is Tom Shadyac, one of Hollywood’s leading comedy practitioners and the creative force behind such blockbusters as “Ace Ventura,” “Liar Liar,” “The Nutty Professor,” and “Bruce Almighty.” However, in I AM, Shadyac steps in front of the camera to recount what happened to him after a cycling accident left him incapacitated, possibly for good. Though he ultimately recovered, he emerged with a new sense of purpose, determined to share his own awakening to his prior life of excess and greed, and to investigate how he as an individual, and we as a race, could improve the way we live and walk in the world… The pursuit of truth has been a lifelong passion for Shadyac. “As early as I can remember I simply wanted to know what was true,” he recalls…” http://www.iamthedoc.com/thefilm/
This is sad, Shadyac is asking the same old question as Pontus Pilate did in John 18:37-38
“Pilate therefore said unto him, Art thou a king then? Jesus answered, Thou sayest that I am a king. To this end was I born, and for this cause came I into the world, that I should bear witness unto the truth. Every one that is of the truth heareth my voice. Pilate saith unto him, What is truth?
Not only did he not hear Jesus, he asked the wrong question.
Plato was right when he taught that the answer is in the question. If you ask the wrong question you get the wrong answer, ask the right question you get the right answer.
Jesus made it very clear that “Everyone that is of the truth heareth my voice”. how much clearer does Jesus need to be?
Jesus did not say Everything that is of the truth, but everyone. He also did not say heareth me tell them truth, but said heareth “MY VOICE.”
Pilate and Shadvac have both asked the wrong question “What is truth” and thus find the wrong answer, if only they asked “Who is truth” since they all seem to be about “being” and “becoming” this should not be hard to understand, that truth is being not a doing, a thinking or a feeling.
Descartes “I think therefore I AM” is blown out of the water by this and instead should be “I AM (God is, not me or you, God’s self generation, self existence) therefore I think, I feel and do.” for all things exist and consist in Him. Notice there is no difference in the words used but the meaning and spirit behind it is as far as the East is from the West. Without discernment you cannot notice the differences.
“For by him were all things created, that are in heaven, and that are in earth, visible and invisible, whether they be thrones, or dominions, or principalities, or powers: all things were created by him, and for him: 17 And he is before all things, and by him all things consist. 18 And he is the head of the body, the church: who is the beginning, the firstborn from the dead; that in all things he might have the preeminence.”
Again look at the repeating pattern of indoctrination coming through
“Armed with nothing but his innate curiosity and a small crew to film his adventures, Shadyac set out on a twenty-first century quest for enlightenment. Meeting with a variety of thinkers and doers…” http://www.iamthedoc.com/thefilm/
Doers is another interesting concept I will not expand on here but you will find in a future blog I am working on called “Bill Gates, Windows and Mysticism”.
Out on a Limb, an old 1980’s movie staring Shirley McLaine also parrots the same diatribe. You can view a portion of this on the below link. i did try to edit the clip but currently have issues with uploading. The conversation about Christianity is quite misleading but the point I wish to make is found at 2’40” till the end of video.
Even in my workplace new software was installed called IAM’s (Information Asset Management System) for record keeping. Coincidence? Maybe, maybe not?
The use of I AM by Rollo May is a clear indication of the purpose for the deification of man.
“I AM, therefore, I think, I feel, I do.” pg 43 Existence by Rollo May.
The meaning of Rollo May’s statement is completely different to mine even though they use exactly the same words.
This is why after years of looking at these things it has become clear that Atheism is merely a pit stop on the road to pantheism. The process is to take from One to the Many. This mirrors the Group Dynamic methods that take people through the “suicide zone” from one authority (Father, parents etc) to the many of the group.
Quoting again from Psychology as Religion
“An important existential concept is “becoming,” the process of self-development or fulfilling one’s potential. This process unfolds by way of the self’s choosing its own course of self-fulfilment. Acts of choice bring the self from initial existence in an actualised self… Transcendence is the name of the important capacity of the existential self… to climb beyond the prior level of self development. Thus as self-potential is developed, each new stage… often is called becoming.” pg 13 Psychology as Religion by Paul C. Vitz.
As we can see this is an “unfold[ing]” a “process” that leads you through to “each new stage”. Thus the blank side of the square was intentionally left out so as to not alert disagreeable persons.
The process has to be gradual and slow else you may wake people up, and then the magic is dispelled.
As website http://www.awakeningonline.com/htms/Transpersonal.htm states
“Phenomenological psychology invites us, as researchers, not just to an awareness of another perspective with a previously unrecognized body of knowledge but to a radically different way of being-in-the-world.” http://www.awakeningonline.com/htms/Transpersonal.htm
This of course is nothing less than the scientification of demonology. (Note how Socialism like a jigsaw piece fits perfectly well with Eastern Philosophy and Mysticism.)
In the words of Karl Marx
“The criticism of religion ends with the teaching that man
is the supreme being for man.”
I found all the markers of this language also in Moses Hess Marx and Engles primary influence initiating them into socialist thinking) and his 1893 Philosophy of the Act (ie: action, doing)
“Only the first word of the Cartesian philosophy is true; it was not really possible for Descartes to say cogito ergo sum, but only cogito. The first (and last) thing that I perceive is my own act of spirit, myself perceiving… I am active, but I do not know that I am. Not being, but the act, is the first and last.
The simple “I,” the thinking in distinction from the thought-about, is empty… What the “I”-sayer believes, the “I,” the identity, here becomes the imminent content of the act – against which the mathematical point, the black nothingness that calls itself Being, manifests itself in the middle of the activity as the fixed and frozen act of self-consciousness…
Living Becoming is turned into dead Being, and self-consciousness into theological consciousness, which now must lie its way out of black nothingness into pallid Being.
The reign of shadows begins. All of the thought-about remains a mere shadow, which shrivels up into a dark point beyond the realm of the thinking…..
The self-conscious “I,” from which all philosophy must proceed, because the “I think,” which has been elevated above all proof and is impossible to prove…”
Notice the use of “cogito” Latin” for “I think”. He is saying the only thing we can say is true is “I think” not “ergo sum”, “therefore I am”.
Here of course is the first premise of Blooms Taxonomy on Educational Objectives book 1 COGNITIVE DOMAIN!
Thinking is all we have and does not mean we have become or have being, but the process has begun.
Hess even is mirrored by Bloom in the statement “elevated above all proof and is impossible to prove”.
Remember Benjamin Bloom admits this fact about his Taxonomy.
Their basis is socialist philosophy and action.
It is also of great significance to note that his language is the same of those of the Mystics and Gurus speaking about the “black nothingness” and “dark point beyond the realm of thinking…”.
This is exactly the description given by Eastern Religion and Mystical Traditions. That in meditation you come to a darkness but which many have described as inhabited by unseen entities that wish to devour and destroy.
This is the Pandora’s Box that is really being opened in the classroom and as you will see took a firm hold of the 19th Century Revolutionary thinkers.
Let us consider the following mythology.
In Gnosticism we are told that Sophia fell out of the pleroma. Being the unity of male and female she gave birth to a son called Demierge.
Demierge created the universe and mankind and reached into the essence of the pleroma and put it in man. (Popularly called the “divine spark” also called “divine essence”.)
Thus we find the idea and expression of this when people speak of “the divine spark.” or “divine essence”.
This is expressed in virtually all religions to which the grand purpose is to bring all mankind into Oneness, a unity so all the essence of the divine can be gathered back together.
The conscience is from One to the Many.
The SuperEgo is Many into the One. (See my previous post on Avicci which initially discusses The One pictorially.)
Why did I seem to digress onto that topic? You will see as much as it is touted that Socialism is irreligious, it was inevitable that at some point the religious nature of man had to reinject spirituality back into the picture. Thus socialisms real completion is the rejection of Jesus Christ and His payment for sin so man can be redeemed from the world unto the Father. That we must recommit the original sin to which I perceive there will be no more forgiveness of sin, for Christ is not coming again to redeem the world but to judge it.
This of course is diabolical for the second fall almost appears to be a second death from which there is no redemption possible. Revelation 2:11; 20:6,14.
Thus it is no surprise that Moses Hess whose primary influence convinced Marx and Engels of the Socialist idea.
Moses Hess was Jewish as was Karl Marx (though what Jewish means here is confusion10for no other purpose that I can see but for the elimination of the few real Jews
that are left.)
I do not wish to get into the issues related to this as it is far too off track and too many have too many varied OPINIONS about what they think are the facts. The only thing I have not mentioned and will is advise you to examine how many of the names listed in this blog at the very least claim to be Jewish.
There is a game afoot and that game is not what those labelled racists or anti semetic or pro zionists think.
What is interesting is Moses Hess developed a new type of Zionism to which we see the results today in the modern state of Israel.
“Every Jew has within him the potentiality of a Messiah and every Jewess that of a Mater dolorosa.” pg 45 Rome and Jerusalem: A Study in Jewish Nationalism by Moses Hess.
Here again is common ground the 5th Force Psychology of man becoming, but in his mind only certain “men” (when men preach peace then there is war, when men preach equality, some are more equal than others).
But what is most significant is that he said the purpose of the Jews must be the creation of “a Messianic state” so that mankind could be ready
“… for the revelation of the divine essence” Red Catechism by Moses Hess.11
Divine essence is the same as the divine spark which all religions claim somewhere in their teachings.The truth does not!
This is the planed and coming World Religion where those who refuse to be initiated into “godhood” will be exterminated.
How this “Messianic State” was to be achieved was through racial and then class struggle
Hess saying in 1862
“The race struggle is the primal one, and the class struggle secondary. The last dominating race is the German. But, thanks to the French people, which succeeded not only in reconciling race antagonism in its own land, but also uprooted every form of race domination within the borders of France, the race struggle is nearing its end. And along with the cessation of race antagonism, the class struggle will also come to a standstill. The equalization of all classes of Society will necessarily follow the emancipation of the races, for it will ultimately become only a scientific question of social economics.” pg 226 Rome and Jerusalem: A Study in Jewish Nationalism by Moses Hess
What Hess meant by that though was not to eliminate racism. Not by a longshot, only to make one race supreme above others as you have read from Hess. Moses Hess was the founder of two movements.
If though you have read my foot note regarding what constitutes a Jew, you will understand that we are talking about Talmudic / Kabbalist / Mystic / Hasidic Jewry. These are most often than not, not even blood linked to the race of the tribe of Judah. These are occultists and worshippers of Lucifer and the Serpent. My personal examination of the rules of the Inquisition has come to my attention to also be synonymous with the Teachings of the Talmud.
There is a distinct hatred for God in their writings. We find the same from Karl Marx
“That art God neither wants nor wists, It leaps to the brain from Hell’s black mists. Till heart’s bewitched, till senses reel: With Satan I have struck my deal.” Der Spiel-mann, poem by Karl Marx.
Sounds distinctly like the social and educational psychologists who desire to partake of the fruit of the garden once more and fall once more.
Showing the love for destruction that comes from the darkness that they tapped into Karl Marx continues to write
“The diabolic steam is rising and fills my brain,
Until I become insane and my heart’s foundation is changed.
Do you see this sword?
The prince of darkness sold it to me.” Der Spiel-mann, poem by Karl Marx
It then is not surprising that we are in the state we are in Nationally, with crime, divorce, delinquency, for “the love of many wax cold.”
It appears the wishes of many wicked men are being fulfilled.
As we have seen before with Marx and Feuerbach we read in Rome and Jerusalem: A Study in Jewish Nationalism by Moses Hess
“… when the old religious ideals were being dethroned, something had to be put in its place to satisfy the craving of men for worship. It was then that Feuerbach stepped forth with his idea of Man. The salvation and elevation of Man is, according to him, to become the religious ideal. Humanity should take the place of Divinity. These ideas gave rise, in the [1840’s] forties, to the Humanitarian movement…” pg 14 Rome and Jerusalem: A Study in Jewish Nationalism by Moses Hess Translators Introduction 1918 edition.
So when you hear the term “Humanitarian Aid” or “a good humanitarian” you now know what is inferred.
The reason I bring up these matters in relation to the education system is this, if you knew the History of the Russian people over the last 100 years, you would be staggered at the slaughter they have undergone.
Amazingly they make Adolf Hitler look like an amateur Satanist.
Stalin himself killed more Jews than Hitler, but why do we not hear about this? Himself having a Jewish Mother like Hitler10.
Let’s look at some statistics.
KGB records were made available after 1991 revealing
10,180,000 persons were slaughter by the Checka between 1918 – 1920.
15,000,000 people died during the civil war.
5,053,000 people died of starvation during collectivisation between 1921-1922
In 1929-31 Communist gangs under Lev Trotsky deliberately caused untold starvation killing 17.7 million horses, 29.8 million cattle (10 million were for milking), 14.4 million pigs, 93.9 million sheep.
Thus 15,000,000 people died of forced starvation between 1932-33 to reduce population and claim no unemployment to the West. (In 1934 Ukrainian children without parents were taken to slaughter houses and cannibalised and sold on the market.
3000 Gulags (prison camps) were set up holding 40-50 million people according to Alexander Solzehenitsyn between 1928-53. Don’t think humane treatment was in order either.
In 1937 it was decided that further population reduction was required. The NKVD was ordered to eliminate 268,950 people. But they increased it to 316,950.
Between 1937-38 the NKVD imprisoned 7,000,000 political prisoners. Killing prisoners at a rate of 40,000 people per month. They also were the first to use gassing of prisoners on trucks on their way to prison.
2,000,000 children were randomly kidnaped by the NKVD and put into death labour camps during 1940-42.
Between 1939 and 1945 (WWII) 20,000,000 Russians had been liquidated by the NKVD according to records released after 1991.
Russian POW’s sent back to Russia after the war were shot or put in labour camps.
All up it has been estimated that 90-100 million people in the USSR were liquidated.
(It is interesting to note that US is now considering it’s war veterans as a “threat” to national security.)
Why do I bring this up?
We find such vile beasts walking upon two legs in our very midst now in Western society.
Take for example dumbed down, conscienceless violent 13 – 16 year olds who crash peoples parties in groups of 20 or more and beat, stab, shoot, impale, etc the guests or even security that are hired (cause there is a need for protection now at family gatherings.)
In each succeeding generation the values and morals are being eroded.
Having examined the Russian Revolution (and we could examine the French too) we can continue a look at education.
One example of the divisionary practices utilised in Education systems with our children I refer to the United States The Protection of Pupil Rights Amendment (Hatch Amendment) made in 1978.
In Phyllis Schlafly’s book Child abuse in the classroom she excerpted much from the transcripts of the the proceedings before the US Department of Education stating in her Foreword
“More than 1,300 pages of testimony were recorded by court reporters as parents, public school teachers, and interested citizens spelled out their eye-witness accounts of the psychological abuse of children in the public schools. They related how classroom courses have confused school children about life, about standards of behaviour, about moral choices, about religious loyalties, and about relationships between parents and peers.” Child Abuse in the Classroom by Phyllis Schlafly.
That is precisely the purpose of the curriculum today. As we have seen Bloom’s Taxonomy state.
As we have seen before they were about creating a chasm, a gap between parents and children, society and children etc.
We are fighting against an obstinate group of rebels who have no desire to abide by “law” In Australia. That law is the Constitution and the Word of God. We are completely encamped by them today like serpents in the grass.
The Constitution is broken daily in this country of Australia. The act of treason is viewed as an act of benevolence or even duty towards the people.
We are led today by people who believe we must be told what to do, and they pursue to structure and educate future generations in a way to prove people cannot moderate themselves correctly by creating crises (aka political correctness thus self censorship).
Kenneth Benee makes this attitude clear.
“If the school does not claim the authority to distinguish between science and religion, it loses control of the curriculum and surrenders it to the will of the electorate.” Society as Educator in an Age of Transition by Kenneth Benee
The parents of children attending school are the electorate. They / We do not send our kids to school to have them turned against us by Government and be used as pawns in a political game of global chess, even universal (spiritual) chess (for him who understands).
What he is saying is that the power should (and today it is) be in the hands of Government Departments who determine what religion it will classify as science (eg: Hinduism and New Age), and what science it will classify as religion (eg: evidence from geology, astronomy, biology, information theory, zoology etc that might prove God or at least biblical events or refute evolution). (You need to sit and seriously think about that for some time.)
This is all about, in the words of Abraham Maslow who sought the liberation of the “ought”, a “system of oughtiness”.
Pied Pipers of the Technological Age leading the whole world into it’s perceived “liberty” only to find out in the end, it being so that they can impose their own rules and crushing burdens on all men, women and children, be it in the binds that are created by immorality, financial incompetence. intellectual disability, and the debilitating list of childish qualities than govern the adults of today all implemented educationally through at least the last 2 to 3 generations so even the parents raising their kids cannot think outside of the process themselves.
2 Peter 2:19
“While they promise them liberty, they themselves are the servants of corruption: for of whom a man is overcome, of the same is he brought in bondage.”
It is the catch cry of the French Revolution which we shall all hear again echoed around the world “Liberté, égalité, fraternité / Brotherhood” as the answer to the oppression being allowed on us all now by corrupt Governments, the New World Order and the rise of Fascism in the West. These are the 3 spirits like frogs that come from the mouth of the dragon, beast and false prophet are leading the world to war. (It appears 3 wars not 1 since we have had 2 already.)
Let us not forget, the flag of the French Revolution was an all Red Flag and adopted as it’s banner and struggled under revived paganism. This was the same copyrighted Solid Red flag of the Communist International coming from it’s use by the Paris Commune in 1871 (see http://revcom.us/a/045/story-red-flag.html), the Phrygian cap of the mystery religions, the bare chested prostitute “lady liberty”. (Lady Liberty in the US is no other than Minerva, or the Roman Catholic Mary, also convoluted within paganism as Apollo etc See my blog on AVICCI.)
As Moses Hess writes in The Red Catechism
“The Red flag symbolizes the permanent revolution until the completed victory of the working classes in all civilized countries: the Red republic.”
Karl Marx also wrote understanding the same saying
“… the old world writhed in convulsions of rage at the sight of the Red Flag.” The Civil War in France by Karl Marx
Just to hammer the point home if you think the two above sources may have bias,
“In July 1791, King Louis XVI and the Royal family attempted to flee France, dressed as ordinary people. They were arrested in Varennes, on their way to Germany. It is often said that the son of the post house’s owner recognized the king after a coin. Other said that the royal princesses were recognized because they were not able to walk correctly without a servant to assist them. Betrayal might be a more rational explanation.
The king was brought back to Paris. A “Republican petition” requiring the overthrowing the king was deposed on Champ-de-Mars, where the Fête de la Fédération had been celebrated on 14 July 1790.
A lot of people gathered to sign the petition. On 17 July, when the meeting turned into a riot, the Mayor of Paris, Bailly, ordered to hoist the red flag, which meant at that time that the mob should disperse. The National Guards shot without warning. More than 50 rioters were killed and immediately considered as the first martyrs of the Revolution. The red flag, “shed with the martyrs’ blood” became the symbol of the Revolution by a weird inversion of its initial symbolism.” Les emblèmes de la France by M. Pastoureau
The French Revolution was the precursor to Socialism, do not think that when you are told by the revolutionary leaders to rise up and take back what is yours that it will end in freedom. You will only believe it is freedom because you had a hand in it.
This is why there has to be a “Generation Gap” so that the educators can forcibly “change” your children from your image (they see you and you see them) and your attempts to hand them on to God to change them into the image of Christ, instead into the image of the beast, the state. In the end the penultimate outcome of what the fall of man entails. The image of Satan himself.
We are speaking of complete and total treason. Complete and total war upon law and order to enshrine lawlessness and chaos only to later impose new damnable laws and a New World Order.
“Bypassing the traditional channels of top-down decision making, our objective centers upon …. transform[ing] public opinion into an effective instrument of global politics.” “Individual values must be measured by their contribution to common interests and ultimately to world interests…. transforming public consensus into one favorable to the emergence of a stable and humanistic world order.” “Consensus is both a personal and a political step. It is a precondition of all future steps…” (Ervin Laszlo A Strategy for the Future: The Systems Approach to World Order)
That is why in future posts I will show you definite examples of side stepping the Constitution in Australia and other nations around the world. (It is actually treason but the law makers have created a contrary system of law within the established law, and it is upheld by Government, Bureaucracy, Courts and Judges, the Media and an ignorant public.)
Humanism is religious as the US Supreme court detailed.
Do not think the leaders of this coming revolution are on your side. They are already prepared to do as they are told by the same people and institutions that run the corrupt Governments today.
Expendable morons like Robespierre and the Department of Safety who implemented the Guillotine.
We may yet find it is our health departments that institute death penalties in the future to those who do not comply with what is coming (euthanasia, vaccination, sterilisation etc).
“The Generation Gap” creates a dualistic, us and them mentality parent vs child.
This is Hegelianism: Thesis vs Antithesis. Synthesis. A process taking you from Conscience through Confusion to a Consensus. When you have one you have lost the other.
What does a parent child conflict produce. Immature teenagers in both parties.
Not quite old enough to understand reasoning to break away from government, not to young enough to not be useful to perform menial labour tasks for the elite yet unable to “work it all out” instead crying “they’re all corrupt” and stamping feet. Not realising that the first matter of importance is that they are the one, who has been corrupted.
Always the first port of call for the immature, to point the finger but not towards themselves.
The dislocation of social coherence was perceived but not understood very early on in 1961, to which we have a far clearer picture today since we have almost reach our destination.
“It seems to me that we are living through a long revolution, which our best descriptions only in part interpret. It is a genuine revolution, transforming men and institutions; continually extended and deepened by the actions of millions, continually and variously opposed by explicit reaction and by the pressure of habitual forms and ideas. Yet it is a difficult revolution to define, and its uneven action is taking place over so long a period that it is almost impossible not to get lost in its exceptionally complicated process.” pg 10 The Long Revolution by Raymond Williams.
This revolution though since that book has been defined, described, the targets have been made clear and the methods upon how this is done is complex yet not original.
These Marxist, Pantheistic, Humanistic, Social Philosopher / Psychologists have an illogical hatred for something they claim does not exist.
Occultist, Madam Blavatsky taught in her book “The Secret Doctrine” that Lucifer was the good god and Jesus was the evil god. So does social psychologist Kurt Lewin who made it clear when he wrote
“An outright enforcement of the new set of values and beliefs is simply the introduction of a new god who has to fight with the old god, now regarded as a devil.” (Kurt Lewin and Paul Grabbe, “Conduct, Knowledge, and Acceptance of New Values” The Journal of Social Issues, 1:3:56-65 August, 1945) http://www.authorityresearch.com/File%20Index%20page%20Speakers/IAR%20Articles%20on%20Diaprax.htm#Diaprax_Articles
These are the values and beliefs that Bloom wanted in our children. We are there, look at the 1960’s. They achieved their goal of revolution, we just didn’t understand the revolution they were seeking. It was thought to be external things like something political, physical and violent, they were aiming for the heart (affective) and mind (cognitive).
They once again have taken from the scriptures to find out how to defeat an enemy they cannot curse. Numbers 22:5-6, Num 23:8, Num 25, 2 Peter 2:13-15, Jude 1:10-11, Rev 2:13. You get them to curse themselves through lowering their morals and offending God.
If we look at Walter Lippman’s take on controlling men and society he saw that literacy
“… did not release the masses from ignorance and superstition but altered
the nature of both and compelled the development of a whole new technique
of control, largely through propaganda. … [A propagandist’s] regard
for men rests on no democratic dogmatisms about men being the
best judges of their own interests. The modern propagandist, like the
modern psychologist, recognizes that men are often poor judges of their
own interests. . . . [Those with power must cultivate] sensitiveness to
those concentrations of motive which are implicit and available for rapid
mobilization when the appropriate symbol is offered.. . . [The propagandist
is] no phrasemonger but a promoter of overt acts. pgs 9-10. Intellectuals and the State, Noam Chomsky
Education is not the answer to the problem. Increasing literacy is not the problem, the issue is the foundation from which a people obtain their values and morals.
This itself will determine how people read and why people read. Reading of itself is an empty vehicle fill with whatever drives the desire to read.
Never before has there been the need for the liberty that the gospel can bring than there is today. For without it men can never be but poor judges of their own interests.
Christ was emphatic that to whom one yields themselves is it’s servant. Romans 6:16.
Sin, contrary to the wisdom of this worlds psychologists and philosophers, is still the key issue dividing man from God and ever the more a shackling of the soul to master manipulators.
The man who refuses to correctly assess his own sin nature and standing with God is a man who has willingly shackled himself to the whim of the world as it’s subject and slave.
If you do not want to be part of the New World Order or the coming Revolution look at history and ask why Britain did not also have a Revolution in 1793, because they almost did. What held the people back from chopping off heads and their head of state?
The Word Of God, the love for God and fear of God.
Do we have that to hold the people back today?
Jesus said Luke 14:34-35
“Salt is good: but if the salt have lost his savour, wherewith shall it be seasoned? It is neither fit for the land, nor yet for the dunghill; but men cast it out. He that hath ears to hear, let him hear.”
Britain had enough salt that it prevented the decaying of the whole, it preserved the peace. Unfortunately I cannot say that I believe there is enough salt today to do the same in our nations.
The Apostle Paul also continued in this vein stating in Colossians 4:5-6
“Walk in wisdom toward them that are without, redeeming the time. Let your speech be alway with grace, seasoned with salt, that ye may know how ye ought to answer every man.”
There was enough godly people to ensure the Revolution could not get off the ground.
It bound the nation together. It dispersed the infection of insurrection.
If we wish to have any chance of heading off this revolution and New Word Order on the beachhead before they disembark for their conflict. There is only one hope. That hope is the same hope that has been for hundreds of Generations.
Hope in Jesus Christ. The Gospel of Jesus Christ.
This is why we are commanded in scripture to “Take up our cross daily”and that an individual “deny himself” Luke 9:23, “kill the fleshly desires”, to “not let carnal lust reign in our mortal bodies” why?
Even modern Psychology knows this. That is why they hate the Bible. It has the only answer to overthrow their means to control the populace. That is why it is mocked, derided, mistranslated with hundreds of new English Versions and ignored.
It is called “approach pleasure, avoid pain”.
Pleasure has been used as the enticing carrot that has led us by our nose to where we are now. The easy road of a life of ease at ease.
It will also be the removal of pleasure that will show mankind as vicious murderous animals when they remove the pleasure stimulus which everything is geared towards feeding us.
When the pleasure is taken away, the pleasure addicts (virtually all people in Western nations) will turn violent like addicts coming off their drug.
The Generation Gap does exist but this is artificially created, children and parents have a loving relationship and it is against nature for the opposite to occur without outside manipulation.
What is more astute is that there is a gap opening up that is far wider than that between generations and it is between the righteous and the unrighteous.
I would call it a Holy Gap.
The times we are in are like a sieve separating the wheat from the chaff.
It is only that love (agape, not eros) for God that will avert disrespect for the office of Authority (God, Parents, Government) whilst empowering the people to rebel (different to revolt and enshrined in our lawful document Magna Carta) and thus disarm the coming blood thirsty revolution from mindless blood lust.
The only thing that can diffuse this coming New World Order and Revolution is the Son who died on the cross to restore us back to the Father.
The world we are in now is the world Jesus came into, that is why there is a popular saying “2 Jews, 3 opinions”. The Pharisees did not stand upon the Word of God as “Authority” but traded in the opinions of men. That is why it is stated regarding Jesus in Matthew 7:28-29
“And it came to pass, when Jesus had ended these sayings, the people were astonished at his doctrine: For he taught them as one having authority, and not as the scribes.”
Let us once again reclaim authority, redeem the souls of the children and restore them to their fathers authority so they are sure where they stand.
2 Thessalonians 2:7-12 shows us how clear and easy we can be manipulated and pushed into these godless actions ending with the key point
“And for this cause God shall send them strong delusion, that they should believe a lie: That they all might be damned who believed not the truth, but had pleasure in unrighteousness.”
The answer the the entrapment of this world and it lusts is found in the Apostle Paul’s words in 2 Corinthians 12:10
“Therefore I take pleasure in infirmities, in reproaches, in necessities, in persecutions, in distresses for Christ’s sake: for when I am weak, then am I strong.”
Utter madness and foolishness in the world eyes, but there is no other answer.
Whilst wicked men have engineered a Generation Gap God through their wicked hands had generated His own cultural gap of separation between His children and the children of this world.
If you don’t know where to start ask for the Old Paths
Thus saith the LORD, Stand ye in the ways, and see, and ask for the old paths, where is the good way, and walk therein, and ye shall find rest for your souls.
Unfortunately the people of Israel of that time replied
“We will not walk therein”.
What will you reply?
No wonder there is a Manufactured and abnormal Generation Gap!!
The 3 frogs are croaking. Be careful what voice are you listening to.
In the Glorious Name of Salvation
This explains why Australia has an identity crisis, we have no culture and cannot explain what it means to be Australian, and thus when Warren Bennis speaks about liability to the child, he is speaking about the child not fitting in with it’s peers, school environment and the social system per se and the social and personal cost to the parent and child if it’s peers and change are resisted (an unusually rare violation of the “approach pleasure, avoid pain” dichotomy.
Al Gores running partner for president. Al Gore wrote Earth in the Balance in 1995 where 3 chapters are dedicated to the goddess Gaia.
I pose the possibility that she may know more about this than first thought. Is it possible that the righteous prior to Noah’s flood only interbred with the righteous (well obviously) and thus these were slaughtered and found hiding and living in caves as the Bible say still happens to the righteous today throughout history. 1 Samuel 13:6, Hebrews 11:36. Is it possible the Neanderthal were those righteous hiding out becoming “extinct”, though it has been found Neanderthal genetics is found in Eastern European peoples.
I wonder then if a recent speech by French President Nicolas Sarkozy is pushing us to the next level of “multiculturalism” where no culture is allowed to exist, and the next stage is no race is allowed to exist. I think it is inevitable that no religion is allowed to exist either in time except for ONE for all.
Sarkozy said at
Palsiseau 17th December 2008 Egalite des chances et diversite
“What is the goal. It is going to be controversial. The goal is to meet the challenge of racial interbreeding (métissage).
The challenge of racial interbreeding (métissage) that faces us in the 21st Century. That challenge of interracial breeding that France has always known. And in meeting the challenge of racial interbreeding France is faithful to it’s history. It is not a choice, it’s an obligation. It’s imperative. We cannot do otherwise. We risk finding ourselves confronted with major problems. We Must Change; therefore we will change all at the same time. In business, in administration, in education, in the political parties. And we will obligate ourselves as to results. If this volunteerism does not work for the Republic, then the State will move to still more coercive measures.”
Métissage is a difficult word to pin down and so I quote a French speaker who writes about it
“I have retained the French word “métissage” (crossbreeding), and it’s various verbal and adjectival forms, since “crossbreeding”, “racial mixing” and other similar terms don’t always convey the right meaning. “Crossbreeding” sounds too scientific, as when farmers crossbreed crops. “Miscegenation” is too technical and refers to marriage. “Mongrelization” and “bastardization” are too graphic. It looks as if “métissage” will join “laïcité” and “communautarisme” as French words that are so troublesome, it’s better to just leave them. http://galliawatch.blogspot.com.au/2008/12/mtissage-now-its-obligation.html
This is not without precedent.
The British in conjunction with Hindu priests when in India kidnapped children left at home in villages during religious festivals.These were shipped over to Fiji. Muslim, Christian and Hindu. When you were lined up for the boat you were told to hold hands. Boys with girls.
The person you held hands with became your breeding partner for life. Regardless of religion.
To let the cat out of the bag as to who is driving this whole thing one needs to examine the Pre-eminent Roman Catholic Theologian St Thomas Aquinas who fits in well with Karl Marx as he said a just law was one that served the common good. Thus common ism is not alien as an ideology from Roman Catholicism.
Roman Catholic theologians have built upon the base of Aquinas and his legal justice, and expanded that base during the past century into a well developed concept of social or productive justice that has the following major characteristics. First, the philosophical basis of productive justice is the view that the individual is essentially a social being. It is through our interaction with other individuals in society that we actualize our true being. Second, labour defined in the broadest sense of productive participation in an economic system is the most important means that we have of realizing productive justice. Third, productive justice is determined in the institutionalized process of integrating the individual into the economic system. As a socio-economic process of integration, productive justice differs significantly from commutative justice and distributive justice winch are primarily concerned with the nature of individual economic relationships.
When most people think of justice, they are referring to distributive justice. In the most general terms distributive justice concerns the issue of allocating the benefits of a society or an economic system among all the members of that economic system. But how to define those benefits and how to determine a just criterion for allocation are highly debatable issues. A survey of the vast literature on distributive justice suggests that there are four primary criteria that contend with each other in these regards: (1) to each according to merit; (2) to each according to rank; (3) to each according to essential needs; and (4) to each the same (Perchnim 1963: 1-29).
This also explains why there is a considerable angst specifically towards Protestantism or the Reformation almost as though they were combating for the Counter Reformation.
As Horkheimer declared as the strongest fortress against their aims
“Protestantism was the strongest force in the extension of cold rational individualism.” Horkheimer Vernunft and Selbsterhaltung, p. 33
Of course they are utterly against “individualism” and completely for the “collective”, but as I respond, there might be no I in TEAM but there is also no U in ME!
Madam Blavatsky also saw Protestantism as an opponent stating
“One out of the three great churches of Christendom is split into atomic sects,
whose number increases yearly; and a house divided against itself, as is the
Protestant Church–MUST FALL.” Theosophy Or Jesuits by H P Blavatsky
published in Lucifer, June 1888.
We though are clearly practising collectivisation and operating a soviet. For example the B20 is a collective of corporations and businesses that produce policy for general acceptance and implementation by the G20. It is a circle within a circle. In fact we have a operative fascist system as well.
Note the following quote by Alice Bailey in relation to the above:
“Group initiation means that the bulk of the members are correctly oriented; that they are proposing to accept the discipline which will prepare them for the next great expansion of consciousness, and that none of them can possibly be deviated from their purpose (note that word with its first ray or Shamballic implications), no matter what is happening in their environment or their personal life. You need to reflect on this if you desire to make the needed progress.” pg 20 Rays and Initiations: A Treatise on the seven rays Volume 5 by Alice Bailey
(NB: I have only emboldened the text here this is in the original!)
“Purpose” is a Word of Power like “Community”, “Innovation”, “Sustainability” etc and has Shamballic implications so next time you hear about Rick Warren playing round with that word, now you know of what spirit he is operating under.
”The rise and growth of associations and movements mostly made up of
young people can be seen as the work of the Holy Spirit, who blazes new trails to meet their expectations and their search for a deep spirituality and a more real sense of belonging.” 105 Evangelii Guadium Pope Francis I. (aka time and process)
65 million men were mobilised in WWI and 57% died. This means 37 050 000 men died in WW1. This does not include civilians and women who also could pass on their traditions and values.
60 – 85 million individuals died in WW2.
Thus in less than 50 years 125 – 150 million plus people died thus prevented from passing on family traditions and habits and the old world.
This was especially significant in European circles
Take for example the Rolling Stones – I can’t get no satisfaction. Satisfaction is a religious term which is in reference to making peace with God. Satisfaction was made by the sacrifice of the Son of God on the cross as hundreds of facts testify. Yet we believe by faith, for faith is evidence of things not seen, which is diametrically opposed to Dialectical Materialism, where something only exists if you see it. Thus satisfaction in Materialistic terms is no guilt and do what you wilt as per Alister Crowley’s “Book of the Law” – this is unbelievably spiritual and religious at every turn.
The whole usage of the term Jew is confusion.
You can have a:
1. Jew of the heart, aka a spiritual Jew aka a believer in Jesus Christ as used by the Apostle Paul in the New Testament
2. Jew referencing those from the tribe of Judah.
3. Jew misappropriated for those from the whole of ancient Israel.
4. Jew misused in reference to the Modern state of Israel.
5. Jew as per an Edomite aka King Herod was an Edomite “Jew” which was considered imposters by the Tribes of the Judahites and Benjaminites.
6. Jew as per the Kingdom of the Khazars because they converted to Judaism.
7. Jew as per one who is a believer in Judaism. (Which is not a follower of the Torah.)
8. Those who claim to have “Jewish” blood in them from their mothers side, even though the Bible states it inherited from the Father.
Followers of the Talmud love to be disagreeable with Moses and Christ thus they are “antichrist” as the scriptures state in 1 John 2:22
“Who is a liar but he that denieth that Jesus is the Christ? He is antichrist, that denieth the Father and the Son.”
The Greek word deny is avrne,omai arneomai meaning to contradict. Thus if your word is not the same word as the Son and the Father you are antichrist.
That is what it means to confess the son. To be of the same word.
Could the real Jew please stand up, assuming Jew is a useful description of anything?
Karl Marx originally claimed Moses Hess wrote The Red Catechism but claimed in 1875 that it was not Hess but Levy who wrote it. Either this was intentional subterfuge or he was unaware of a letter from Hess to Weydemeyer dated July 21, 1850.